WRC - detail of adjudication

swanie29 · 09-09-2018 10:55AM #1

Guys have a question for anyone here got a verdict that went against me in wrc but in the report it's totally one sided and yet the questions the adjudicator put to to the other side are not mentioned in his report which proved that there actions of the employer were of a discrimation matter. One question the other side was asked was about mistakes and they tried to play it down but it then put by the adjudicator that I disagree and should of being given the chance to see the mistakes as to learn from them. There a was other questions he asked but his own report has no mention of these. What people views or advice

swanie29 · 09-09-2018 11:15AM

Any advice would help

nuac · 09-09-2018 11:51AM

Mod
( Sorry, I made a mistake. Thanks GM228 for correction )

Grab All Association · 09-09-2018 11:58AM

You can appeal it to the Labour Court within 42 days.

swanie29 · 09-09-2018 12:01PM

A

Grab All Association wrote: »

You can appeal it to the Labour Court within 42 days.

I know that but really what I want to know if left this information out am I bunched also how many cases get overturned by Labour court I would think not a lot

swanie29 · 09-09-2018 12:09PM

swanie29 wrote: »

A

I know that but really what I want to know if left this information out am I bunched also how many cases get overturned by Labour court I would think not a lot

Also I confused as why that his questions are not part of his own report and there was no note taker

GM228 · 09-09-2018 12:24PM

swanie29 wrote: »

Guys have a question for anyone here got a verdict that went against me in wrc but in the report it's totally one sided and yet the questions the adjudicator put to to the other side are not mentioned in his report which proved that there actions of the employer were of a discrimation matter. One question the other side was asked was about mistakes and they tried to play it down but it then put by the adjudicator that I disagree and should of being given the chance to see the mistakes as to learn from them. There a was other questions he asked but his own report has no mention of these. What people views or advice

When you say report I think you mean decision, there is no need for the adjudication officer to detail every question/statement/opinion etc, just to give his/her decision. How they format that decision is entirely up to them and each officer has their own style.

GM228 · 09-09-2018 12:25PM

nuac wrote: »

Mo

You may need to re-amend nuac, the LRC was disbanded several years ago and is now the WRC.

Mod

Ooops thanks, GM 228.
Forgot the memo

GM228 · 09-09-2018 12:27PM

swanie29 wrote: »

A

I know that but really what I want to know if left this information out am I bunched also how many cases get overturned by Labour court I would think not a lot

Some do, some don't, most decisions are upheld though.

swanie29 · 09-09-2018 12:59PM

GM228 wrote: »

When you say report I think you mean decision, there is no need for the adjudication officer to detail every question/statement/opinion etc, just to give his/her decision. How they format that decision is entirely up to them and each officer has their own style.

Well they admitted that basically they wear not set up with my disability which the adjudicator asked them and they admitted I have not see my mistakes sure enough even this is an enough to have a balance descion like it makes out i could of killed someone which was or never would be the case

swanie29 · 10-09-2018 06:48PM

swanie29 wrote: »

Well they admitted that basically they wear not set up with my disability which the adjudicator asked them and they admitted I have not see my mistakes sure enough even this is an enough to have a balance descion like it makes out i could of killed someone which was or never would be the case

Any one with any other thoughts

WRC - detail of adjudication

Comments