Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Werewolf XXVIII - Eastenders

15556586061115

Comments

  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Ewan WW wrote: »
    Readying the first letter of Katie's posts I get

    I See What You Done

    Yes, see my mail below yours with details

    Again I’d be cautious, Katie was calling out wolves early on with lots of WIFOM references


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 2,733 ✭✭✭Ewan WW


    We have an hour and fifteen minutes to sort something out here. I don't agree with the view that Willard is just flavor as he's been mentioned specifically in flavor. He's robbies dog but if Babs is Robbie, babz says he's not controlling him. SO do we still have a BG out there? If so can you protect Eva please.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    Can I point something else out that I think a lot of us know anyway?

    Yes please


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    I can't even keep up with this game any more.
    In the last few hours we've had Babs and her box and she promised us a wolf, cause a bandwagon onto Fiona (saving her own skin in the process might I add) and then reveal she actually has nothing.

    We've had Jake reveal a gun and start waving it about

    We've had Riona crawl out just as she's in danger of being shot, claim seer and gives us two names that are definitely wolves

    And now we have an app priest whos claiming someone else as seer and has proof.


    I can't even follow this game anymore...

    I get happier and happier I didn't choose the damn gun, lol

    Nigel, you're wrong. My plan didn't save my skin. I doubt anyone who was going to vote for me would have trusted me and jumped ship then. By the looks of it, I saved Dorris, who came second and loooked to be closer the chopping block.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Morning folks. Riona can LOL away, but for any villagers who care...

    Riona WW wrote: »
    I feel i have to post this now or we lose if i die. I am Pauline Fowler the nosey parker seer.

    I have had 2 peeks and i have 2 wolfs, unfortunately for me they were both in my ffa1 and they both showed negative interest in me yesterday which leads me to believe that they are threatened by me and I have them badly spooked. They have tried to get me into the lynch race twice unsuccessfully and I fear they will take the easier option this morning. And that is why i am posting this now

    2 wolves in your first 2 picks in a game of 24/25 other players. 2 who you admit had suspected you on some level. That's just remarkably good fortune on your part. Well done.

    You're one to talk about "feeling threatened by me" when you've conjured up this claim against, as you admit, the posters who showed negative interest in you. You come across as feeling threatened yourself, and not in a "Oh please hear me before these pesky wolves munch me" way.

    I never tried to get you "into a lynch race", you were never my number 1 in the FFAs and if I pressed with anyone who was in my FFAs, it was Fiona. I simply expressed suspicion about you in an FFA, also at a time when as you said yourself, there was little else to go on in the game. I actually told you that I had cooled on you yesterday, but feel free to rewrite history on that since you're in full creative mode anyway.

    As for Jake's drunken bullet episode last night and you seeing that as me drawing you into the heat, Jake asked about the low posters. Not my fault at all that you were bottom of that list. I gave Jake two names, the 3rd lowest was in-thread (Gabriel) and Jake signified that he wanted to kill a non-active poster ("Not Orla, she's too active"). At the same time of giving those names, I stressed that we be careful. And that's when Jake was suggesting shooting at posters who aren't Eva or in your bad books, i.e. my wolf brethren according to you. Even Doris who has targeted me, I suggested Jake don't shoot her. How wolfy of me.
    Riona wrote:
    Peek 1

    Orla - Max Branning

    I had peaked orla first as her post about catching up was so wolfy to me i had to put her in my ffa1, what sealed her peek was her inclusion of me in hers when i wasn't anywhere on her radar until i gave my ffa

    There has been an abundance of posts from different people talking about getting bogged down with "catching up" and offering little else at the time. I quoted 2 of them yesterday and wrote under them "Eh...RIONA?!" but you chose to ignore it and them. I guess those posters didn't suspect you earlier in the game, or as you'd put it, look wolfy.
    Riona wrote:

    Peek 2

    Eva - Trevor Morgan

    Eva was also in my ffa1 for being so aggressive and trying to stir the pot day0, I peeked her last night as she started to include me in her suspicions along with Orla due to my ffa1

    So, "I peeked Eva cause she was sniffing around me, just like Orla." It really is work of the Gods that we both ended up as wolves on your first and only picks so far. Is there still a mid-week lotto? You should do it if so.

    Riona wrote:
    If i don't survive the munch my next peek was going to be Derry, as he like Orla and Eva also had interest in getting my name out there negatively, and these are they only 3 people that had continues interest in me so they stood out like a sore thumb knowing what i knew about Orla, then Eva.

    I had no interest in getting your name out there negatively. There is a difference to having a mild suspicion and playing the game versus trying to start a bandwagon. At no point did I press with you, and even admitted yesterday that my interest was cooling in you.

    "If I don't survive the next munch" ...You know right well that you're going to survive the next munch (and that it'll be nothing to do with the BG).
    Riona wrote:
    The village is not in a good spot tbh so i am going to name people who i think are not wolfs that need to work together and finish this for the village. I said not wolfs but they could still be the sk, i have been more focused on finding the wolves due to me getting Orla on my first peek so i haven't had as much thought put into my search for the sk, a few i could say in that list are definitely not the sk but i won’t name them as they would be a target for the sk, i will let you work it out, i do think the ones not on the list are more likely to be an sk though


    I know some of you guys have been fighting with each other but you have to work together now i have been playing with the knowledge of two wolves so i have spotted things that you guys simply couldn’t so you need to trust me

    Liam
    Nigel - i know i voted you last night but looking over what i know now with eva and orla you are not a wolf
    Ewan
    Doris
    Barbara - unless something hard comes out against her then i think she is good
    Conor
    Gabriel
    Angus
    Abigial

    Derry and Clodagh would be my next lynches,

    re Clodagh - i thought Clodagh was the bodyguard beforehand but as her reaction to Babs last night tells me she isn't, i believe she could be a wolf, the reason i thought she was the bg was because in her ffanolynch trustee she picked Fiona and when Fiona was protected at the first lynch she said she couldn't understand why anyone would pick Fiona to protect, i thought she was trying to distance herself from her earlier statement and protect her role but now i see she blatantly lied and wolfs are well known for that dirty tactic, she also had me in her ffa1

    re Derry - Derry had Orla in his first ffa which gave me doubt in their wolfniess, but as the game progressed he hasn’t questioned her and he made Eva trustee on the first day, Derry used the same excuse Eva used for having me doggy, my gut tells me he is a wolf he also had me in his ffa1 and 2 and his reason for both inclusions was me asking about 2 teams on my first post, something Eva also used against me (he has a strong assumption that a wolf knew there was more than one team... i wonder how he knows that?)

    Henry and Tegan would be next down my list -

    re Henry - Brendan posted some doubts about henry twice without including him in his ffa, i think henry was spooked but as he wasn't in Brendan's ffa he thought he could get away with killing him (just my thinking on this)

    Given what I know about myself and what I now highly suspect about you Riona, I'd almost take all those people in your bad books as either definite good or an SK you who you want the village to rid for you. And the 'good' people as possible wolves.

    Speaking of SK, I see Derry is on your shít list there. Not surprising as he suggested that you would be his pick for SK. Clodagh in there cause you were in her FFA. This really is the Fake Seer Claim of Vengeance.

    Interesting to see that out of everyone you named up there, you didn't say anything about Jake who was waving a gun when you came in with your claim. Sure why would you when self-preservation was your goal?

    Riona wrote:
    Also very important Fiona was 100% good so the priest does not need to feel the urge to come out to confirm that,
    Fiona ffa1 and voted for Orla day 1 and Orla the wolf voted for Fiona day 1, Fiona was protected by the bg from the sk and then Orla continued to press for Fiona at the next lynch and she was lynched with an unfortunate hand from Babs. I also think everyone that has died so far has been team good but Fiona is 100% certain Good.

    Ah, so I'm starting to see what's going on here. This whole thing is because I contributed to your alpha getting lynched and you remaining wolves are the ones in a bad position. Why on earth would BG have protected low-lying Fiona?!

    By the time that this CFD started with Fiona last night, I had admitted that I might have been wrong about Fiona, because guess what, someone finally answered some of my questions. Had someone actually responded to my concerns earlier than 8pm last night, there might have been a chance to talk things through and not rush on Fiona. I wasn't pressing Fiona at that stage, I was very much backing down. Had Barbara not lit that fuse, Fiona would still be here.

    However, your tale is now making me feel strongly that Fiona was alpha. She survived the Nick hit because she had at least one extra life/protective jacket. Now she's been lynched, maybe there's another wolf gone too. This is the desperate wolf play you came up with last night to send the village away from your direction for at least one more day. You're afraid that you what you think I did to Fiona will happen to you. I'm just surprised that you have Barbara marked as good after her part in your alpha's end, maybe you're just trying to keep her onside for some future purposes.
    Riona wrote:

    Really sorry for the long post but i need to say everything i couldn't say over the last few days without brining heat on myself.

    Best of luck
    PF

    No, don't be sorry. You've achieved exactly what you set out to do here. You've popped up to apparently save your skin when it was in little danger from a bullet or likely even a munch. All in the hope that the village will now do your dirty work for you. I honestly know nothing about Eva, and that is a fault of mine, but she is one on a list of about 15 players I haven't gotten a proper read on yet. However, I do know you wouldn't hang a fellow wolf out to dry when there's no heat on them, so Eva is likely good or SK.

    Do what you will village, but make a decision and move on, don't let this fully consume our day. I really think Riona presented you with at least one wolf in herself with that post, and likely Fiona too who was alpha. Two low-lying wolves to go with that. There are more words in this one claim of Riona's than all of her other posts combined in the game so far. Quite desperate when there was no real apparent reason to be.


  • Advertisement
  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Clodagh WW wrote: »
    Lol have to correct myself now

    I see what you done there wiwi

    Yeah that’s correct. Who’s wiwi?

    Could the wolves have munched her because they misunderstood the message ? :pac:


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,258 ✭✭✭Clodagh WW


    Abigail WW wrote: »
    Yeah that’s correct. Who’s wiwi?

    Could the wolves have munched her because they misunderstood the message ? :pac:

    Is it a reference from the show?


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,936 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    duffman13 wrote: »
    EASTENDERS LATE NIGHT EPISODE PANNED BY FANS

    The shows decision to run an episode post watershed had been seen as a risky move and fans expected fireworks. The episode never really kicked off though as Phil Mitchell was seen menacingly holding a gun. He was bizarrely then seen drinking heavily in the Vic with Peggy laying on the rounds. Phil left the pub not realising he'd dropped his bullet. As he stumbled from the pub he took aim on an unsuspecting target.

    He pulled the trigger, the only sound after that was Phil collapsing in heap, extremely drunk! It is not known if producers will run a late night episode again

    It's not even 9am and my head is spinning. I dunno what to believe at all. Claims, counterclaims, bullets, hidden messages, seers all over the gaff. ****!


    Looks like Jake is legit though. So must be on Team Village then? Said he had a gun, took a shot, shot appears to at least have been attempted so he was telling the truth (though drunk).


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,936 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Orla luv do you sleep at all? Are you a vampire?


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Bejeepers, we might have someone else as Seer with Katie, and a confirmation that Jake is Phil Mitchell (and therefore village we can safely assume).

    Mad aul game.


  • Advertisement
  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,669 ✭✭✭Doris WW


    I will have a statement in 1 hour


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Holly WW wrote: »
    Orla luv do you sleep at all? Are you a vampire?

    Ah come on, I've my hands full as it is with these wolf accusations :pac:

    Thanks for the concern Holly, got a few hours last night yeah. Had a long weekend of working late hours, hence my witching hour posts the first few nights.

    And no, I'm not a witch either!


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 4,830 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Abigail WW wrote: »
    Yes please

    I’m taking away Rionas excuse as to why she wasn’t munched right now. She’s gonna say “well, the wolves must have thought the BG was protecting me so munched elsewhere”

    I believe Fiona was the BG and protected herself. It would have been first protect right and BGs more often than not protect themselves first time round.

    We don’t need the priest to come out if my theory is correct. Let’s see if Riona is munched


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    I guess I'll have one last post pre munch.

    I'm bloody nervous now. Not operating on a spectrum anymore. More confident I've either done brilliantly or done disastrously.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Am I missing something or is the next play simple enough?

    Claim on seer with two wolves named

    One of the names claims app priest and confirms priest is alive

    Therefore lynch the other named wolf who hasn’t claimed and if they’re not a wolf the still alive priest comes out

    Worst case we get 1:1
    We know we have an app priest
    If app priest is really a wolf they can’t be munched


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 4,830 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Holly WW wrote: »
    It's not even 9am and my head is spinning. I dunno what to believe at all. Claims, counterclaims, bullets, hidden messages, seers all over the gaff. ****!


    Looks like Jake is legit though. So must be on Team Village then? Said he had a gun, took a shot, shot appears to at least have been attempted so he was telling the truth (though drunk).

    Jake should get a bafta. He was playing the drunk Phil Mitchell role.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Doris WW wrote: »
    I will have a statement in 1 hour

    Dun dun dun dun du dun....


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,258 ✭✭✭Clodagh WW


    Abigail WW wrote: »
    Am I missing something or is the next play simple enough?

    Claim on seer with two wolves named

    One of the names claims app priest and confirms priest is alive

    Therefore lynch the other named wolf who hasn’t claimed and if they’re not a wolf the still alive priest comes out

    Worst case we get 1:1
    We know we have an app priest
    If app priest is really a wolf they can’t be munched

    Think about the rest of the game.....Without a seer counter claim, thats no seer (unless we have an app seer), the priest out and dead by lynch (SK) and then app priest dead by tomorrow morning......we would most likely be flying blind for the rest of the game.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 4,830 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Babs, you’re not off the hook either if Fiona was the BG.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 2,733 ✭✭✭Ewan WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    Babs, you’re not off the hook either if Fiona was the BG.

    Fiona was protected from the SK, she cant be the BG.


  • Advertisement
  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    Babs, you’re not off the hook either if Fiona was the BG.

    If Babs was the BG, I have misread the game horrifically, and I'd expect to be offed very quickly. And my stomach churns at the idea of the abuse I'll get in the dead room too,,,,


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 4,830 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Ewan WW wrote: »
    Fiona was protected from the SK, she cant be the BG.

    What if she used the protection on herself?


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Clodagh WW wrote: »
    Think about the rest of the game.....Without a seer counter claim, thats no seer (unless we have an app seer), the priest out and dead by lynch (SK) and then app priest dead by tomorrow morning......we would most likely be flying blind for the rest of the game.

    Nope, lynch is the non claiming wolf. At that point, subject to who’s munched, we have a claimed app priest and a claims seer. If priest is silent we lynch the claimed app priest - priest still in play. If priest comes out we lynch claimed app seer. Priest will be munched but we then get app priest. With bodyguard we can stretch the priest to maybe four turns which should be plenty


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,258 ✭✭✭Clodagh WW


    Abigail WW wrote: »
    Nope, lynch is the non claiming wolf. At that point, subject to who’s munched, we have a claimed app priest and a claims seer. If priest is silent we lynch the claimed app priest - priest still in play. If priest comes out we lynch claimed app seer. Priest will be munched but we then get app priest. With bodyguard we can stretch the priest to maybe four turns which should be plenty

    What claimed app seer?


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 4,830 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Orla, what’s the numbers again, is it 17 players?

    It’s wednesday so I’ve got a funny feeling they’ll be deaths a plenty if the schedule is to finish Friday.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭Riona WW


    Eva just pulls I see out of know where, hmmm I wonder who would be looking for seer clues,

    Katie was not the seer, she could have been the apprentice or a witness, I have had no tasks FYI

    I won't be munched as Eva and orla would be hanging themselves in that case, so I might get one more peek


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Clodagh WW wrote: »
    What claimed app seer?

    Should read claimed app priest


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Riona WW wrote: »
    Eva just pulls I see out of know where, hmmm I wonder who would be looking for seer clues,

    Katie was not the seer, she could have been the apprentice or a witness, I have had no tasks FYI

    I won't be munched as Eva and orla would be hanging themselves in that case, so I might get one more peek

    It’s a fair point.....


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 4,830 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Riona WW wrote: »
    Eva just pulls I see out of know where, hmmm I wonder who would be looking for seer clues,

    Katie was not the seer, she could have been the apprentice or a witness, I have had no tasks FYI

    I won't be munched as Eva and orla would be hanging themselves in that case, so I might get one more peek

    Called it!


  • Advertisement
  • Forum Games Player Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭Conor WW


    Clodagh WW wrote: »
    What these posts that you made after I told you that you are way off? I can see what you are doing abi. Building tomorrow's wagon. Go after the highest poster, make claims with no groundwork put in and give any other doubters some fuel to run with. It's a joke.

    Gently tries to steer everything? What are you even talking about. I'm doing the bulk of the heavy lifting in terms of analysis and ALWAYS offer a solid conclusion to my thoughts. The only exception to that, that proves the rule, is one comment amongst 7 others that was about you!

    Heavy lifting my left nut, you've about 5 useful posts, one calling out Babs on Day 1, the other barely, just barely calls out Derry and someone else.

    Loads of speculation on the game, roles and rules and loads of posts asking for the village to band together and asking for a cohenerent village plan, while opening stating you're away from bandwagons.

    Your game so far has been the definition of covering all bases


Advertisement