Werewolf XXVIII - Eastenders

Barbara WW wrote: »

Steve when the gun backfired on him

Eva WW wrote: »

I meant their sister Joni earlier,

which led me to pictures of Sam Warnock, which reminded me I saw her in Addams Family in Dublin last year!

Blocked by the mods? they might be fking with us

Nah, would the mods do that?

20 odd,people left and only three or four are posting.

Wolves will win through process of default at this rate.

Night all.

I'd be inclined to think a vote blocker at this point is not a good role.

Simply from a numbers game.

If it is a good role, it has to be a prime target for the wolves to go after tomorrow though. Letting such things go would be suicide for them, long term. Imagine getting towards the end and noT being able to vote. From a goodies PoV, it would be way overpowered by he end of the game.

Riona WW wrote: »

Hello all

So is there 2 teams of wolves in the "The Wrong Uns" and "The East End Wolf Pack"?

The op isn't 100% clear on that

Possible prior knowledge of two wolf packs.

Riona WW wrote: »

Good morning all

I hope we have got innit out of our system by now

all business.

Riona WW wrote: »

Should we have a FFA for the bullet and get that over with and then work on FFA for lynch?

Another idea is we don't use the bullet as it has a higher chance of killing a good person than a wolf so the wolfs will most likely want us to use it, we outnumber them heavily atm and we don't have much evidence for a solid target on day 1

organization, good, holster the bullet as a choice, fair, but when given a chance to kill wolves, dont we take it, better to have a 5% chance of hitting bad that 0%, this is same argument as using a no lynch option, i hate no lynch.

Riona WW wrote: »

Steve will probably shoot me for going against his idea but I don't think naming who we trust is a good idea, its doing the job for the wolfs and if we did pick a wolf in the trust pile it gives them a coast from a few lynches

I think its too risky

Please don't shoot me

i disagree here, but is is not alligment indictitive, just differing opinions on the merits of forming a town to fight the wolves. I think it is good idea, others don't.

Riona WW wrote: »

So steve didn't have the gun?

Or is grant a vigliante

So many questions!!

are we sure that steve was not grant?

Riona WW wrote: »

I wont post much until around this time of the day but i do keep update, i think ffa is a good option, it wont tell us anything now but its all about what it tells us down the line when we are near the end game, so starting early is beneficial to that cause.

I will have mine up before 7pm

ffa is fine, i think myself i prefer just getting reads on everybody and being transparent in what my views are, then when I am dead and people see i am villager, they can come back to my reads lists and know they were done by a villager.

if everybody was to do this, btw, if we find a wolf, we can determine that we don't trust their reads list and can even try to find clear villagers from who they were hot to lynch.

Riona WW wrote: »

#ffa1

Orla - Flying under radar posting fluff - Latest post updating us on how far they have caught up

Eva - Throwing aqualutions around under the guise of rattling cages d0, calls out katie , few posts later katie jokingly says she knows the wolves, eva goes quiet and katie dies the next day (could be done on purpose to cast doubt on eva either)


Ewan - Asking the vig to come out not long after the shooting wasn't very villagery in my eyes

Riona WW wrote: »

We have a lot more ffas to get in before 7 guys

more organization.

Riona WW wrote: »

Why would you give someone a faulty gun that would kill at random and risk rolled villagers dying?

Riona WW wrote: »

Did you know the guns properties before you handed it to steve?

Riona WW wrote: »

Ok, and you had to pass the gun, you didn't have a choice?

these three are grouped together as they ask questions and follow up, decent enought line of questioing too.

Riona WW wrote: »

I think this is them all but someone might want to check over it

Riona WW wrote: »

2 more

Riona WW wrote: »

Im missing you from my list and your missing abigail from yours

more organization.

Riona WW wrote: »

So we have a sk and a bg, really nice work bg

Okay, so that sums up Rhiona posts so far...


The ffa is the only accusations they make, its all mech observations and organization stuff other than that.


the ffa itself is decent enough but why dont you question the people in your ffa and get answers for the behaviour. don't hide behind the ffa mech of having to have reads on three people and then do no other questioning.


I do not see why they would have been Steves target which i was under the impression they were from skimming the day with so little time left in the day, i'll update my notes on riri now.

Mary WW wrote: »

Hello

Mary WW wrote: »

Anyone wanna tl;dr the first 25 pages? I see Katie was killed.

Mary WW wrote: »

Also I'm no lip reading expert, but that does not match up

Mary WW wrote: »

I'm out if there is nothing of note

Mary WW wrote: »

I agree. I think its more likely that whoever really got the gun made a poor decision and shot steve. But maybe it is the case of extraordinary bad luck because why would Gertude make the alphabetical mechanic.

marys first getting inolved post.
is this just a names mix up, i thought it was gabs.

Mary WW wrote: »

Can't help but lol at this. I'm not in the mood to read Steve's 100+ posts and I'm the prime suspect to be lynched.

I'll ask you one thing, do you really think a wolf would act the way I have acted today?

Haven't a breeze who I'm voting for

So, it was a policy lynch, lynch the low posters.
Not something i disagree with tbh.


the counter argument is that we could be lynching power roles.
the counter counter role is that the pwer roles would get out of the chaff at the bottom at least.


nothing wolfy in the posts, but not hard against a policy of lynch those not getting involved peek the high posters.

I'll ask you one thing, do you really think a wolf would act the way I have acted today?

the answer to that is no.

[qoute]Haven't a breeze who I'm voting for[/QUOTE]

the whole idea behind the policy is about ^^^ that.
we dont want somebody who is dodling alone and being a never lynch to have to make a decision to win or lose the game if it comes down to final 3.

Barbara WW wrote: »

Detective Barbara is adding a third column to her list.

"Trusted", "not trusted", "useful idiot".

Wasnt 'Useful Idiot' a term used by the Russian on Homeland to cause problems in the USA, you know the bad wolves....

*twiddles thumbs*

Brendan WW wrote: »

Just want to confirm I put in an FFA yesterday which perhaps intentionally but most likely not was not included by those doing up the ffa tallies. I voted as I ffad but will probably vote differently in day two if given more info (don't know if I had enough then) just guessed who the charlatans were.

Indeed

Barbara WW wrote: »

Also, re blocked votes.

Is there a chance the baddies have a power to block two people's votes a night then?

I've seen a case in the past of powers to block 1 vote, but I don't know about 2.

Munch, SK hit, 2 x votes blocked, while the village get a very uncertain lynch and an even more uncertain bullet episode. It seems like the game would be very stacked against the village if the bads got all of that on Day 1.

However, there's still a chance. Something had to block those votes especially since the posters have said that they definitely registered a vote.

Great game so far, but there's almost too many mechanics at play for me to get my vanilla head around. I'm still trying to work out what exactly happened with that gun Gabriel gave to Steve, how it played out, where Grant fits in, all of that

Seems we have 2 teams of baddies. I'm not going to read too much into flavor but I'm going to be watching for tasks more vigilantly now be it attempts to get conversions or whatever. Obviously be careful highlighting certain tasks things tho as we also don't know how many roles goodies we have who could be doing some. That said I've been catching up on yesterday's work so far this morning and boards has been showing errors so see ya when I see ya ha

I VOTED AND USED THE CODE WORD PROVIDED.

Clodagh WW wrote: »

Yes it has.

And the molly award goes to.....

I humbly accept. :rolleyes: (football really got me wound up last night)

Ok so back to business. 2 wolf teams seems all but confirmed now. Not sure about the SK but it's the most plausible explanation for the Fiona thing yesterday. Still not sure how she survived.
But we have no idea how many wolves are on the second team and why they didn't get a kill on N0. Were they all sleeper wolves who didn't realise they were evil and only got activated yesterday? Was there a task on D0 that one wolf team won over the others? Are we then expecting 2 kills today at 10am?

While I didn't vote for her I see the need for the Mary vote last night. She was not contributing to the village and with so much ambiguity in this game we need all villagers talking and participating in order to get data we can work on.

Hold on, did I miss something, where are we getting the 2 wolf teams from, we had Den (wolf team) and Nick (most likely SK)

So, how do we know there is another wolf team?

Barbara WW wrote: »

When I make a mistake like that, I go back and fix it, if I don't notice after a few words....

Edits are not allowed?