Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Can a Christian vote for unlimited abortion?

1151152154156157174

Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 16,111 Mod ✭✭✭✭smacl


    Human as they define it. You can see the problem.

    I don't suppose that a Christian charity operating worldwide would be viewed as anything but "religious interference" if they chose to campaign for a No vote - their otherwise good works notwithstanding

    If you're talking about the Iona institute there, you might want to list some of those otherwise good works, because from what I can see they're a heavily funded lobby group that have been granted charitable status on the grounds of pushing a religious agenda, but have never actually carried out any charitable works. As for other groups, they seem faceless so we don't know what their agenda is precisely, other than shouting 'No', nor who's paying them. Do we really want to give the bible belt conservatives who voted Donald Trump into power a voice in this country? How about the much loved Westboro Baptists, who declared "God hates Ireland" after our last referendum?
    Amnesty is a global organisation and uses that globally-sourced good egg status to influence a nations referendum

    I'm not sure what the UN has to do with it. Again it's their (majority) view of what constitutes human / human rights which dictates their position.

    Whatever about Amnesty, in case you weren't aware, we're part of the UN, so you're not talking about 'them' you're talking about 'us'. It is written into article 29 of our constitution that "Ireland affirms its devotion to the ideal of peace and friendly co-operation amongst nations founded on international justice and morality". Those UN human rights are the ones that we've collectively signed up to as a member nation,


  • Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I don't see how that's relevant. Everybody commentating holds a view. It doesn't matter where that view comes from - unless your a priori supposing that the materialist\empiricist view is neutral or something.

    People are people with belief systems first and professionals second.

    Actually no as a doctor a person should be professional first and treat the patient as best as they can to the persons wishes. People wouldn't stand for a doctor who is a Jehovah Withness refusing to providing one of their patients a blood transfusion because it goes against their personal religious beliefs or stating on a public format that people should not be provided with transfusions because they believe it's wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Mod:

    Indy I've deleted your post. You cannot post an external link drive by.

    This isn't your own personal promotional soapbox.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,298 ✭✭✭Thinkingaboutit


    There was an opinion article in the Irish Times by long time UK pro-life campaigner and politician, driven from the Lib Dems for his pro-life views, David Alton. He pointed that most UK abortions are on exceptional grounds (category C), and in respect of what has been promised, there is to be no time limit for abortions on exceptional grounds. A yes vote endorses the very gruesome late term abortions. Another piece, some weeks earlier, a pro-abortion piece, said those abortions were rare, but the single figure percentages refer to what is basically infanticide.

    Anyhow no legislation has been agreed. It could be anything if there is a 'yes vote' and even that will change to whatever pleases the political class, the system.

    Returning to the question, If a Christian is the sort who see the Ten Commandments as something to be interpreted in line with modern values, whatever that is, then 'thou shalt not kill,' is just a suggestion to be taken in context, but for me, and all sincere Christians, killing the unborn and nearly born child is grossly wrong, a sin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,550 ✭✭✭antiskeptic


    There was an opinion article in the Irish Times by long time UK pro-life campaigner and politician, driven from the Lib Dems for his pro-life views, David Alton. He pointed that most UK abortions are on exceptional grounds (category C), and in respect of what has been promised, there is to be no time limit for abortions on exceptional grounds. A yes vote endorses the very gruesome late term abortions. Another piece, some weeks earlier, a pro-abortion piece, said those abortions were rare, but the single figure percentages refer to what is basically infanticide.

    Anyhow no legislation has been agreed. It could be anything if there is a 'yes vote' and even that will change to whatever pleases the political class, the system.

    Returning to the question, If a Christian is the sort who see the Ten Commandments as something to be interpreted in line with modern values, whatever that is, then 'thou shalt not kill,' is just a suggestion to be taken in context, but for me, and all sincere Christians, killing the unborn and nearly born child is grossly wrong, a sin.

    In the womb, no one can hear you scream. A silent holocaust.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,252 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    There was an opinion article in the Irish Times by long time UK pro-life campaigner and politician, driven from the Lib Dems for his pro-life views, David Alton. He pointed that most UK abortions are on exceptional grounds (category C), and in respect of what has been promised, there is to be no time limit for abortions on exceptional grounds. A yes vote endorses the very gruesome late term abortions. Another piece, some weeks earlier, a pro-abortion piece, said those abortions were rare, but the single figure percentages refer to what is basically infanticide.

    Anyhow no legislation has been agreed. It could be anything if there is a 'yes vote' and even that will change to whatever pleases the political class, the system.

    Returning to the question, If a Christian is the sort who see the Ten Commandments as something to be interpreted in line with modern values, whatever that is, then 'thou shalt not kill,' is just a suggestion to be taken in context, but for me, and all sincere Christians, killing the unborn and nearly born child is grossly wrong, a sin.

    You see, that's the problem with modern civilization.
    If we do away with God, and being accountable to Him ( forget the Church discussion..it's irrelevant) , we can do whatever we want.
    Just like if we convince ourselves into believing that an unborn child isn't a child, we can do whatever we want with it.
    We've lessened the value of human life. It's only a "foetus" , it's not a child, we can cut it up and suck it out of the " owner of the body". If it's born alive, we can leave it in a table in a room and let it die...it's not a child, only an unwanted lump of cells.

    "And everyone did what was right in their own eyes" has as much relevance today as it did in the days of Noah.
    I honestly don't care what the pro abortionist say on this thread or any other thread.
    God can be written out, a human life can be de- humanised. God is still God and He will judge. A human life is still just that, a human life and if there are those who want to destroy it. Their actions are seen, innocent blood will cry from the black sacks it was disposed in and God will judge.

    You don't believe in God, I don't care! It makes no difference to His existence. The fool has said in His heart, there is no God.
    Don't like being called a fool? Tough!...That's what God says, and His opinion means more to me than the many in here.

    I'm not getting into the debate about groups advocating a position. It's irrelevant to the truth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,550 ✭✭✭antiskeptic


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    Actually no as a doctor a person should be professional first and treat the patient as best as they can to the persons wishes. People wouldn't stand for a doctor who is a Jehovah Withness refusing to providing one of their patients a blood transfusion because it goes against their personal religious beliefs or stating on a public format that people should not be provided with transfusions because they believe it's wrong.

    The point was that all opinions are informed by worldview. The jw doctor, the pro life and pro choice. What doctors should and shouldnt do is informed by the norms of the society around them. In a jw country, werd there such a thing, the jw doctor wouldnt be confined by the same oughts as he is here.

    Youre projecting the oughts of this society as if they were absolute things. They are not.

    If this society decided that a doctor ought not carry out the wishes of a patient then that is what ought to be done - says this society. And if this society decides conscientious objection permissible in the case of assisting in an abortion then that is what ought to be done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,550 ✭✭✭antiskeptic


    You see, that's the problem with modern civilization.
    If we do away with God, and being accountable to Him ( forget the Church discussion..it's irrelevant) , we can do whatever we want.
    Just like if we convince ourselves into believing that an unborn child isn't a child, we can do whatever we want with it.
    We've lessened the value of human life. It's only a "foetus" , it's not a child, we can cut it up and suck it out of the " owner of the body". If it's born alive, we can leave it in a table in a room and let it die...it's not a child, only an unwanted lump of cells.

    "And everyone did what was right in their own eyes" has as much relevance today as it did in the days of Noah.
    I honestly don't care what the pro abortionist say on this thread or any other thread.
    God can be written out, a human life can be de- humanised. God is still God and He will judge. A human life is still just that, a human life and if there are those who want to destroy it. Their actions are seen, innocent blood will cry from the black sacks it was disposed in and God will judge.

    You don't believe in God, I don't care! It makes no difference to His existence. The fool has said in His heart, there is no God.
    Don't like being called a fool? Tough!...That's what God says, and His opinion means more to me than the many in here.

    I'm not getting into the debate about groups advocating a position. It's irrelevant to the truth.

    At risk of the Godwinists I'd reiterate an earlier point. Obtaining Lebensraum requires you to overcome your internal moral compass. Others live in the space you desire. And so you render the occupants sub or non human and exterminate them. Obstacle gone and you move into the desired space.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 395 ✭✭indy_man


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Mod:

    Indy I've deleted your post. You cannot post an external link drive by.

    This isn't your own personal promotional soapbox.


    Turtwig, so if I create a new thread to post that site I am pretty sure it will get stopped straight away. Yet again more censoring of the pro-life side. Even in a supposed Christian forum we can not get our message across, weird.


  • Moderators Posts: 52,151 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    indy_man wrote: »
    Turtwig, so if I create a new thread to post that site I am pretty sure it will get stopped straight away. Yet again more censoring of the pro-life side. Even in a supposed Christian forum we can not get our message across, weird.
    MOD NOTE

    If you have a question about moderation please take it to PM rather than derail the thread.

    Thanks for your attention.

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You see, that's the problem with modern civilization.
    If we do away with God, and being accountable to Him ( forget the Church discussion..it's irrelevant) , we can do whatever we want.
    Just like if we convince ourselves into believing that an unborn child isn't a child, we can do whatever we want with it.
    We've lessened the value of human life. It's only a "foetus" , it's not a child, we can cut it up and suck it out of the " owner of the body". If it's born alive, we can leave it in a table in a room and let it die...it's not a child, only an unwanted lump of cells.

    "And everyone did what was right in their own eyes" has as much relevance today as it did in the days of Noah.
    I honestly don't care what the pro abortionist say on this thread or any other thread.
    God can be written out, a human life can be de- humanised. God is still God and He will judge. A human life is still just that, a human life and if there are those who want to destroy it. Their actions are seen, innocent blood will cry from the black sacks it was disposed in and God will judge.

    You don't believe in God, I don't care! It makes no difference to His existence. The fool has said in His heart, there is no God.
    Don't like being called a fool? Tough!...That's what God says, and His opinion means more to me than the many in here.

    I'm not getting into the debate about groups advocating a position. It's irrelevant to the truth.

    Your truth in your opinion, not the truth of many who share different faiths or none.

    Thinking that you have the one true religion or view of God isn't very Christian in my opinion and is akin to the attitude that has caused religious conflict in the past and present.


  • Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The point was that all opinions are informed by worldview. The jw doctor, the pro life and pro choice. What doctors should and shouldnt do is informed by the norms of the society around them. In a jw country, werd there such a thing, the jw doctor wouldnt be confined by the same oughts as he is here.

    Youre projecting the oughts of this society as if they were absolute things. They are not.

    If this society decided that a doctor ought not carry out the wishes of a patient then that is what ought to be done - says this society. And if this society decides conscientious objection permissible in the case of assisting in an abortion then that is what ought to be done.

    Sure society and it's values change.

    At one time society in general in Ireland believed the RC and to a lesser extent other faiths could do no harm, this sadly has been shown not to be the case and society has grown more distrustful with good reason of the same.
    .
    In the case of a JW country, assuming that every JW without question follows their religions belief regarding transfusions, people would eventually look at the evidence that transfusions have saved lives in other countries and societies and eventually there would be a group that would call for these to be made available in their country, because they save lives. Eventually such a groups influence could grow and either a vote on the subject will eventually be had.

    This is the same case in relation to the 8th, part of society believes that abortion in several scenarios such as FFA, a woman's life being in danger etc should be an option. Fine your religious beliefs make you feel that this shouldn't be the case, I can understand this and respect this, but what I don't believe or respect is your beliefs should personally affect someone else as neither should my beliefs affect them personally. If you don't want an abortion or for one of your loved ones then don't have one or insist/resist them having one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,252 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    Your truth in your opinion, not the truth of many who share different faiths or none.

    Thinking that you have the one true religion or view of God isn't very Christian in my opinion and is akin to the attitude that has caused religious conflict in the past and present.


    Firstly, as this is the Christianity forum, Christianity is the predominant focus of the forum, not other belief systems.
    Secondly,I'm not the one who said Christianity was exclusive. Its founder did. He also said, there was only one Truth and it was Him.
    Finally, your opinion of what is Christian or not is irrelevant to the thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,600 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    I was at mass earlier which the sermon was given to pro life campaigner. While I believer she got her point across *regardless if you believe or not) she also used no stats just her beliefs. I am not a fan of these topics been done in a mass due to having kids around. Same reason why I hate posters. Tv can be after watershed.

    I am more than likely voting yes. In relation for FFA and rape etc I am yes all the way. For 12 weeks I am a no. This is as when I hear someone us pregnant I think baby not a group of cells or as I heard before a parasite.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,252 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    I was at mass earlier which the sermon was given to pro life campaigner. While I believer she got her point across *regardless if you believe or not) she also used no stats just her beliefs. I am not a fan of these topics been done in a mass due to having kids around. Same reason why I hate posters. Tv can be after watershed.

    I am more than likely voting yes. In relation for FFA and rape etc I am yes all the way. For 12 weeks I am a no. This is as when I hear someone us pregnant I think baby not a group of cells or as I heard before a parasite.

    You dont get a choice on this one if its repealed. The Government have clearly said 12 weeks. Where it goes after that is anybodies guess.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,600 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    You dont get a choice on this one if its repealed. The Government have clearly said 12 weeks. Where it goes after that is anybodies guess.

    I realise that so am a bit conflicted but I think the first part is what is making me vote yes especially as I know it is all ready happening be it by a plane ride. Voting no is not going to stop happening it just pushing it out of your eyeline


  • Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Firstly, as this is the Christianity forum, Christianity is the predominant focus of the forum, not other belief systems.
    Secondly,I'm not the one who said Christianity was exclusive. Its founder did. He also said, there was only one Truth and it was Him.
    Finally, your opinion of what is Christian or not is irrelevant to the thread.

    No actually it is I am a Christian, so why are my opinions not important and yours are to the thread, because I disagree with you?

    I find your posts to have an unchristian theme, you believe only you can judge who a Christian is and who should voice their opinion or not, both unchristian values in my mind.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 730 ✭✭✭Achasanai


    Returning to the question, If a Christian is the sort who see the Ten Commandments as something to be interpreted in line with modern values, whatever that is, then 'thou shalt not kill,' is just a suggestion to be taken in context, but for me, and all sincere Christians, killing the unborn and nearly born child is grossly wrong, a sin.

    This would be fine if it were your opinion, but it absolutely doesn't apply to all Christians.

    Throughout history, Christians (and even popes) have had differing opinions on when a fetus is a separate entity, and when it is acceptable to abort. The Church of Ireland had a very different interpretation of the 8th back in 1983 (against it being implemented) to that which it has taken now (save), although some bishops (and some priests) have come out strongly in favour of repeal.

    There is a reason why there are such heated arguments between Christians regarding abortion, and that is because there is no definitive and explicit reference in the Bible to outlawing abortion. The NT doesn't mention it, and - perhaps most importantly in a document that includes incredibly detailed rules & regulations concerning laws & people breaking them - neither does the OT.

    The question whether a Christian can vote for 'unlimited abortion' - despite this not being what we will get if/when we repeal the 8th - is the same for non-Christians: how do you personally balance the rights of the fetus as opposed to those of the pregnant woman.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,252 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    No actually it is I am a Christian, so why are my opinions not important and yours are to the thread, because I disagree with you?

    I find your posts to have an unchristian theme, you believe only you can judge who a Christian is and who should voice their opinion or not, both unchristian values in my mind.

    You were obviously referring to a different thread than the one you qouted !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,395 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    At risk of the Godwinists I'd reiterate an earlier point. Obtaining Lebensraum requires you to overcome your internal moral compass. Others live in the space you desire. And so you render the occupants sub or non human and exterminate them. Obstacle gone and you move into the desired space.

    Lebensraum??

    Come on, OTT doesn't even begin to describe that reaction.

    What on earth has the Nazi invasion of other countries got to do with what is a very private, personal experience? Like this woman:
    ”It’s nearly 2 years to the day since I met him. I remember him asking me out and thinking I wasn’t really interested, but hey what harm would it do. Low and behold we fell head over heels for one another. I was looking for a new job, at the time I was miserable in the part time job I’d taken to provide for my daughter when me and her dad split. I’d been in finance before and wanted a career to provide a better life for my daughter and I. I was applying for new jobs when I met him.
    He had a child not even one, he had split up from the mother, “all her fault of course” and all he wanted to do was be the best dad as his father hasn’t been around when he was growing up.

    Fast forward 3 months, everything was going great. A few differences of opinions but nothing major. I was due my period and it was a day late. He begged me to take the test saying he had a “feeling” I was pregnant. I brushed it off saying don’t be so silly, it’s a day late. I mean I’ve often been 3-4 days late but he went and bought the test anyway. I called down that evening to him, said give me it I’ll do it. Did it and left the stick on the bath and he came in. I didn’t even look at it because in my head I wasn’t. He looked at me, you’re pregnant. I felt a sinking feeling in my stomach. I looked at the test and let a howling scream and cried my eyes out. “I can’t be, what are we gonna do?” I said. His answer was, what can we do, we’re having a baby. I said there’s option. His response was “there are no other options” as he stared down at me with a stern expression on his face. I cried for what seemed hours and went home.

    I told my sister, she said you have options I shook my head. Weirdly he seemed overjoyed. It was like he was getting a second chance at being a parent again in a new relationship. I told him that if he needed to talk to someone to get advice to tell a member of his family, but he in fact told him whole family who in turn told other people. I was only 6 weeks, if even, at that stage. I refused to go to the doctors for weeks, putting it off. Eventually I did but I broke down when I spoke to her. She was so understanding and said to me that I had to do what was right for me.

    Every morning when I woke up I felt this huge weight on me, I would cry for hours. I had been such a good mother up to then with my little girl, doing things with her, playing with her, but now I was this moody and sad mother who sat around and spent her time crying.

    After that the rows started. How I parented my child, what I did wrong, what she should be behaving like. It won’t be that way when the baby comes along. One day we had this blazing row and it was just one comment that made my mind up after debating with myself for weeks. He turned around and said, “you’d want to change your attitude, I mean you hardly want to end up a single mother with two kids from two different fathers.” That was it, my mind was made up for me.
    That day I rang my sister, I booked flights from my savings for us to go to the UK. I called up the clinic and booked my appointment.

    I told my mam, she was very upset and didn’t agree with abortion but my sister explained to her I had to do it, look at her she’s a shadow of herself she doesn’t even lift her head to look at anyone she’s that low.

    I remember waking up and feeling a sense of relief it was over. I had to have a surgical one as I was on the cusp of the cut off point for the tablets. There was another irish woman there on her phone in the recovery room speaking to whoever was minding her kids saying “I’ll collect them this evening.” I had booked to stay the night and I thought to myself if I had to take a flight straight after this I probably would of broke down. I admired that woman’s strength.
    I had turned off my phone knowing I would receive messages and calls as I had told him what I was going to do.

    I woke up to a barrage of messages of how I was a murderer, I had killed a child and it was the same as killing the child I have now. That killed me and I broke down. I sobbed in my sister’s arms. The messages came in one after the other, name calling, telling me how I was unfit to call myself a mother. It went on and on.

    I blamed myself. I look back now and think maybe he wanted to get me pregnant all along, he was so sure I was pregnant before I’d taken that test. I even know the night it may of happened. I’d had one too many drinks and we didn’t use anything. I don’t really remember much about the night, vaguely remember we had had sex but I thought no more of it. When I checked my dates it fell around the same time as then.

    It’s now over a year and a half since I had the abortion and I’ve never felt regret. .... It just stops women risking their lives, like the woman that was in that waiting area with me, rushing home to her kids on a flight.

    I know it was the right choice for me and my daughter and I can now finally give her the life I’ve wanted for her.”

    And there are so many other women, all different, all with their own lives and problems. How anyone can compare that to the Nazis is just ridiculous.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    volchitsa wrote: »
    Lebensraum??

    Come on, OTT doesn't even begin to describe that reaction.

    What on earth has the Nazi invasion of other countries got to do with what is a very private, personal experience? Like this woman:


    And there are so many other women, all different, all with their own lives and problems. How anyone can compare that to the Nazis is just ridiculous.

    While also ignoring that parts of the retain group are linked to neo nazis classic.


  • Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You were obviously referring to a different thread than the one you qouted !

    Nope


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,550 ✭✭✭antiskeptic


    volchitsa wrote: »
    Lebensraum??

    Come on, OTT doesn't even begin to describe that reaction.

    What on earth has the Nazi invasion of other countries got to do with what is a very private, personal experience? Like this woman:


    And there are so many other women, all different, all with their own lives and problems. How anyone can compare that to the Nazis is just ridiculous.

    Its not the nazis / american conquest philosopy / british colonianist philosophy in Africa I'm considering. Its the people who bought into the message and acted to obtain lebensraum. All acting personally for what they thought they would obtain for themselves. A better life, the pursuit of health,wealth and happiness.

    The parallels are clear: something desired for self, soneone standing in the way, that someone rendered non human and then eradicated.

    Financial difficulty, for example, is awful. But it not awful enough to take a life.

    Reduce the value of the life though and action to avoid financial difficulty is warranted.

    Reduction of the value of life is essential. For lebensraum, whether on a national or personal scale.

    Abortion macht frei?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,395 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Its not the nazis Im considering. Its the people who bought into that message and acted to obtain lebensraum. All acting personally for what they thought they would obtain for themselves

    Maybe you don't know what Lebensraum was then.
    The parallels are clear: something desired for self, soneone standing in the way, that someone rendered non human and then eradicated.

    Financial difficulty, for example, is awful. But it not awful enough to take a life.

    Reduce the value of the life though and action to avoid financial difficulty is warranted.

    Reduction of the value of life is essential. For lebensraum, whether on a national or personal scale.
    There are literally no parallels here with the ideology of Lebensraum.

    You might as well compare abortion to any sort of colonialism, the Spanish colonizing the New World for example. But of course that wouldn't allow you to get your Godwin point, would it? :rolleyes:

    So why don't you say how the woman whose account I linked is taking over other people's personal space for selfish reasons? She has a child and can't take of another, and especially not one that will connect her to a controlling man for the rest of her life.

    Nothing like Colonizers taking over another country. :rolleyes:

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,550 ✭✭✭antiskeptic


    volchitsa wrote: »
    Maybe you don't know what Lebensraum was then.


    There are literally no parallels here with the ideology of Lebensraum.

    You might as well compare abortion to any sort of colonialism, the Spanish colonizing the New World for example. But of course that wouldn't allow you to get your Godwin point, would it? :rolleyes:

    So why don't you say how the woman whose account I linked is taking over other people's personal space for selfish reasons? She has a child and can't take of another, and especially not one that will connect her to a controlling man for the rest of her life.

    Nothing like Colonizers taking over another country. :rolleyes:

    Im not attempting to deal with extreme cases. Im dealing with the commoner garden. And that wont countenance putting the life up for adoption. Not even 9 months worth of lebensraum and the danger of how one might feel once the baby is born can be sacrificed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,550 ✭✭✭antiskeptic


    volchitsa wrote: »
    Maybe you don't know what Lebensraum was then.


    There are literally no parallels here with the ideology of Lebensraum.

    You might as well compare abortion to any sort of colonialism, the Spanish colonizing the New World for example. But of course that wouldn't allow you to get your Godwin point, would it? :rolleyes:

    So why don't you say how the woman whose account I linked is taking over other people's personal space for selfish reasons? She has a child and can't take of another, and especially not one that will connect her to a controlling man for the rest of her life.

    Nothing like Colonizers taking over another country. :rolleyes:

    The parallels are clear: I want. Another is getting in the way of what I want. Sub humanize the other. Eradicate the other. Obtain what I want.

    Please point out which sentence is flawed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,395 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Im not attempting to deal with extreme cases. Im dealing with the commoner garden. And that wont countenance putting the life up for adoption. Not even 9 months worth of lebensraum and the danger of how one might feel once the baby is born can be sacrificed.

    I deliberately did post up a "common or garden" case. Not one about FFA or the woman being seriously ill or any of those. A sadly ordinary case.

    And can you stop with the Lebensraum nonsense, it's really offensive.
    It's a political ideology belonging to Nazism, not a pregnancy.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,550 ✭✭✭antiskeptic


    volchitsa wrote: »
    I deliberately did post up a "common or garden" case. Not one about FFA or the woman being seriously ill or any of those. A sadly ordinary case.

    And can you stop with the Lebensraum nonsense, it's really offensive.
    It's a political ideology belonging to Nazism, not a pregnancy.

    I awaiting a deconstruction of the essence of the argument.

    Tough if you find it offensive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,395 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    The parallels are clear: I want. Another is getting in the way of what I want. Sub humanize the other. Eradicate the other. Obtain what I want.

    Please point out which sentence is flawed

    Several flaws.

    A 12 week foetus is not a person.

    If people really thought it was, we would have investigations into miscarriages as a matter of course.
    We also wouldn't have voted to allow people to travel abroad to kill them.
    And we wouldn't tell women who order and use abortion pills in the country that they have nothing to fear from the police or justice system if they need medical treatment as a result.
    Among other problems with your assumptions.


    Another problem is that Lebensraum was not about individuals "wanting" anything, it was about increasing the size of the country to prove that Germany was the most powerful country in Europe. It was also "nationalism-as-national-security", ie getting rid of populations that might betray you in the area you've just taken over.

    Lebensraum was not, as you seem to think, about stealing works of arts or getting a nicer flat - that is just the spoils of war and has happened the world over. Including Israel, when Palestinians had to flee, and in England during the wars of religion.

    You obviously didn't read the link I gave, in fact I suspect you are just blindly parroting the latest talking points from McGuirk or someone like him without understanding what you are actually saying.

    How exactly was the woman who was already bringing up one child and was afraid of the effect of bringing this man into her daughter's life anything like the Nazis invading the Sudetenland?

    It's offensive and stupid.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,395 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    I awaiting a deconstruction of the essence of the argument.

    Tough if you find it offensive.

    Gimme a chance, I just did. And I'm doing other stuff as well as reading your silly claims.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



Advertisement