Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

NAS with no backup?

  • 19-12-2017 08:31PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,103 ✭✭✭


    Hi
    Is it possible to just have a Synology NAS with no RAID (or SHR) options?

    I have two 8TB drives in a NAS and backups are going to be kept on external hard drives.

    When I go into RAID Type I see SHR (Synology Hybrid RAID) and the two drives and it's saying available space is roughly 7TB. I'd like to see 14TB :)

    I click Manage on the Volume and Change RAID Type is greyed out.

    Thanks
    M


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,103 ✭✭✭mathie


    Got it. RAID0.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,977 ✭✭✭minikin


    A striped volume (RAID0) is quite risky!
    If one drive fails that’s all your data gone


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,094 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    16TB RAID0 is kinda fault prone alright.

    I'd go for JBOD and software pool them together.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,804 ✭✭✭degsie


    You can delete the current volume and set up two separate volumes instead. Back up any needed data first.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,103 ✭✭✭mathie


    ED E wrote: »
    16TB RAID0 is kinda fault prone alright.

    I'd go for JBOD and software pool them together.

    What is "fault prone" about RAID0?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭Nate--IRL--


    mathie wrote: »
    What is "fault prone" about RAID0?

    A fault on either drive = 16TB loss

    With 2x 8TB Volumes, A fault on either drive = 8TB loss

    Basically you are increasing your risk of dataloss with RAID 0 for no gain.

    Nate


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,094 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Also if they're SMR drives then the odds are potentially increased again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭Nate--IRL--


    ED E wrote: »
    Also if they're SMR drives then the odds are potentially increased again.

    Thanks for that - I wasn't aware of SMR Drives before. Archive Disk is the best description I could use for them. Write Seldom, Read Often.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shingled_magnetic_recording

    Nate


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 97,116 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    minikin wrote: »
    A striped volume (RAID0) is quite risky!
    If one drive fails that’s all your data gone
    It's called Raid 0 because that's the exact number of files you'll recover if any drive has a fault.

    Note
    since filesystems like NTFS put small files in an $MFT area you probably won't recover files below the stripe size either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,457 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    If you just want to see all the folders from both drives in one listing, you could use Libraries feature in Windows.

    But you probably doing something else entirely.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement