Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

What will we do when the oil runs out?

Options
2

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,379 ✭✭✭donegaLroad


    Drumpot wrote: »
    Anybody else read that like it was a Yorkshire man trying to say silent Fuel?

    or Somerset even


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,515 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    I don’t worry about stuff like this.

    There’s really smart people somewhere working on this, they don’t come round worrying about my work so I’m not going to start worrying about theirs.

    I could spend my whole time worrying about the “big picture”, but honestly I’d rather spend time with my kids, safe in the knowledge that a boffin somewhere will solve “peak oil” and all that stuff.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭Nettle Soup



    Anyone have any ideas?

    Can we still eat cake?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,379 ✭✭✭donegaLroad


    _Brian wrote: »
    I don’t worry about stuff like this.

    There’s really smart people somewhere working on this, they don’t come round worrying about my work so I’m not going to start worrying about theirs.

    I could spend my whole time worrying about the “big picture”, but honestly I’d rather spend time with my kids, safe in the knowledge that a boffin somewhere will solve “peak oil” and all that stuff.

    me too, but its nice to know that some young fella in Holland is being proactive about the plastic pollution problem, and although I know I will never reach his levels of innovation, I will teach my kids to dispose of their litter in an appropriate way in the hope that they will influence others to do the same. Its a start I suppose :o


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Sweetemotion


    Use synthetic oil?

    All this, what will happen when the oil runs out. Is a big fat nothing burger.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,564 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Was that the utter claptrap that emerged from UCD a few years ago? Breathless endorsements from those involved, while the rest of the academic world cast a jaundiced eye at a University looking for a ranking point?

    I have no idea. You didn't exactly flood us with detail.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,201 ✭✭✭Doltanian


    Every minute, a truck load of plastic is dumped into the sea. By 2050, the weight of plastic in the sea will exceed the weight of fish in the sea.


    Unsurprising, all rivers invariably lead to the sea.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 353 ✭✭Creative83


    Doltanian wrote: »
    Unsurprising, all rivers invariably lead to the sea.


    Holy sh** :mad:


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,239 ✭✭✭Elessar


    Like another poster said, we can synthesise oil from coal. I read somewhere that there's enough coal reserves in the US alone (including untapped or currently economically unreachable reserves) to last us a thousand years. Not to mention the current proven reserves of oil of an estimated 1.69 trillion barrels, and then theres shale oil reserves about 3.5 times that. And then there's the unproven reserves, and all the other coal and gas reserves worldwide that can be liquified.

    Oil is not running out, pretty much ever.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,710 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    How about using Organic oil. Sure should be healthier for us anyway and the world too hopefully. s for the oil in the Antarctic I don,t think that should ever be extracted as there is no much at stake and the same for oil in the North Pole. Some things are best left alone.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Fanny Wank


    I find "have a jimmy floyd" to be an appropriate response to most questions along the lines of the OP


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,908 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    steddyeddy wrote: »
    This is an area I'm involved in. In short biologically generated fuel is the future IMHO. The hydrogen engine's another option, but a long way off.
    Francois Isaac de Rivaz made the first hydrogen powered car back in 1807. It even had electric ignition.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,908 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Oil won't run out in the sense that most oil is to too expensive to recover from wells.

    We can make oil from hydrogen from renewable energy for about four times the cost of extracting it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,984 ✭✭✭jojofizzio


    mark_jmc wrote: »
    Tell Saudi Arabia what we really think of them

    By a country mile-the best response so far-take a bow..:)


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,500 ✭✭✭BrokenArrows


    https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/06/28/the-world-was-533-years-of-oil-left/11528999/

    Granted, the article is 3 years old but it raises an important question. What the hell are we going to do when oil runs out :O Pretty much everything you own, eat, wear etc is a byproduct of oil.

    Nuclear & renewable energy power may provide our electric power but it won't create things like plastics the way oil does.

    It's actually a very scary scenario if the worlds oil supply dwindles. Wars will start over it. Bio-fuel might do a bit to offer some hope but at the moment it's not advanced enough to satisfy any kind of demand... and it may never be.

    Anyone have any ideas? Seems hopeless :O Modern life destroyed without oil.

    With current technology the world could go oil free in a fairly short period of time. Its just the current infrastructure which is preventing a fast transition.

    If the oil were to disappear tomorrow and the world was pushed to renewable then I doubt it would take more than a few years to get back to a semi normal situation.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,908 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Generating energy isn't actually the problem.

    Hydrocarbons are easy to store and transport. Electricity isn't.

    We could power the world from solar. It would cost a bit more though, the main cost would be in storing and transporting the energy.

    In theory we could expose bedrock. This would absorb C02 so we could go on burning oil.

    Or we could expose olivtine (sp.) to water to produce hydrogen, but it would be a mega-project.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,613 ✭✭✭server down


    To get back to the peak oil. The time left (now 50 years up from 30 years 30 years ago) is present day proven reserves divided by present day yearly usage.

    However proven reserves are a fraction of the total known reserves. It’s oil fields now in production. In decreasing reserve sizes the categories are:

    Remaining oil and gas in-place (original oil and gas in-place minus cumulative production at a specific date)
    Technically recoverable resources
    Economically recoverable resources
    Proved reserves

    Proved reserves are from existing oil fields.

    Economically recoverable resources are oil fields we could now technically and economically tap, but don’t yet do it. So those fields are not proven.

    Technical resources are not economically viable yet but technological changes or market price changes can affect that. The rest are known resources we can’t technically tap but new technologies - like fracking - change that.

    All together there’s hundreds of years of all reserves left if you believe that we can technically and economically tap most known reseves. And that assumes present day demand continues at its modern pace. However most of they oil will stay in the ground if you believe that demand will peak soon because of renewables.

    https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=17151


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,613 ✭✭✭server down


    That’s nonsense too. Solar is getting cheaper year on year and the technology is getting cheaper and more efficient every year.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,908 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    NB. it's peak cheap oil.

    we will still have oil or an equivalent but it will cost a bit more


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,613 ✭✭✭server down


    NB. it's peak cheap oil.

    we will still have oil or an equivalent but it will cost a bit more

    The cheap oil ran out before they started drilling the North Sea.

    Anyway demand will likely stop rising at the rate it is now and then reverse as EVs and renewable power generators become common.

    There was a day this year when 70% of the UKs energy was low carbon.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,613 ✭✭✭server down


    What science though? Show us your workings.

    Heres a link you would may want to critique.

    http://uk.businessinsider.com/map-shows-solar-panels-to-power-the-earth-2015-9?r=US&IR=T


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,008 ✭✭✭uch


    If they don't have Yorkshire Relish for the Beef on sunday, then I couldn't be one of them

    21/25



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,613 ✭✭✭server down


    No I wouldn’t believe you. For many reasons. Firstly you are a random guy on the internet. Secondly your statement is factually incorrect. You said we couldn’t with present and future technology replace oil with solar - that is technically. Not economically. That it wasn’t theoretically possible.

    Yet that article says that with 20% efficient solar panels we would need an area the size of Spain ( but that could be solar panels on rooftops or in deserts equal to the size of Spain etc not just all of Spain). That’s a small fraction of the Earth. And in fact lab panels are more efficient now at 45%. That article is from 2017.

    It could be wrong so show us your workings. Scientists can do that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,605 ✭✭✭gctest50


    What science though? Show us your workings.

    ....


    15,264,000,000 is a lot of litres per day to be using

    Oil is so useful for so many things, bit of a waste using it for energy


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,613 ✭✭✭server down


    gctest50 wrote: »
    15,264,000,000 is a lot of litres per day to be using

    Oil is so useful for so many things, bit of a waste using it for energy

    Yes but not really answering the question :-).

    The problem of renewables isn’t technical, it’s economic (although that is changing as solar gets cheaper without subsidies), and political.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,564 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    The question is a misnomer. It's not about when the oil "runs out".

    It's about when peak supply is reached and supply starts to fall.

    As soon as that happens the price of oil will explode and the world will be in crisis.

    Not likely to happen for some time though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,268 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    In that event, everyone should move to India. 20C in winter. It's currently 34C and its only 8 am:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    What will we do when the oil runs out?

    Rapeseed oil.

    How about farmers turning to fields of rape seed oil?

    Like on a massive worldwide scale, as a harvested fuel with government backing & multinational incentives to grow the stuff?


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,908 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    The cheap oil ran out before they started drilling the North Sea.

    Anyway demand will likely stop rising at the rate it is now and then reverse as EVs and renewable power generators become common.

    There was a day this year when 70% of the UKs energy was low carbon.
    LOL I don't really consider Nuclear to be low carbon , when you consider the front loading, decommissioning and displacement of real renewables. Wind can be carbon neutral after a few months, a lot of nuclear plants won't ever be.

    Meanwhile our national grid , first in the word, can take up to 65% synchronous, which is mostly renewables. And that's not including Turlough Hill

    Oil is still cheap. It's not as cheap so our power plants don't use it anymore and we don't use it for heating as much. So there's more to go around.


    Oh yeah all those announcements about companies making only electric cars. Mostly they are hybrids, as in ordinary cars except that when you brake some of the energy gets stored in a battery.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,729 Mod ✭✭✭✭smacl


    Yes but not really answering the question :-).

    The problem of renewables isn’t technical, it’s economic (although that is changing as solar gets cheaper without subsidies), and political.

    Its a bit more complex than that though. The principal issue involving intermittent renewables, whether wind, solar or wave is storage. Not so much of an issue for solar panels in a desert perhaps, but anywhere else you have to consider weather and seasonal variation in terms of consistent supply. Next big problem is transmission, which for electricity over long distances is both lossy and expensive to maintain. Third is time to construction, in that we'd be long past peak cheap oil before a project of this scale would be completed, but cheap oil could actually be required for construction. Even on a more local and considerably more modest level, if you look at Hinkley Point C for example, it got the go ahead in 2008 but won't be supplying power to the grid until 2025 earliest. My feeling is that in this country at least, the bulk of our renewable energy will continue to come from wind, possibly with pumped hydro as storage.


Advertisement