Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Jobstown 6 Not Guilty

1…2930323435

Comments

  • #932
    WinnyThePoo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    Of course you did.



    So you were to much of a coward yourself to call him a thug. Thought so.

    Yea I know. All Hail Paul.


  • #933
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,692 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    WinnyThePoo wrote: »
    Yea I know. All Hail Paul.

    Your posting can easily be discounted from now on. It is clear your issue with all this is politically motivated.
    You'd have been happy to see these men in jail because you disagree politically with them.
    Pathetic really and deadly dangerous to democracy.


  • #934
    Hitman3000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    WinnyThePoo wrote:
    Yea I know. All Hail Paul.


    Not at all, just love keyboard warriors such as yourself. The attitude of some at the result of the court case is an absolute disgrace and is worrying for our democracy that such a blind eye would be turned the actions of the state just because Murphy and people like him are not part a certain grouping in our society.


  • #935
    WinnyThePoo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    FrancieBrady wrote: »
    Your posting can easily be discounted from now on. It is clear your issue with all this is politically motivated.
    You'd have been happy to see these men in jail because you disagree politically with them.
    Pathetic really and deadly dangerous to democracy.


    We have already had this talk about assumption francie.


  • #936
    Hitman3000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    FrancieBrady wrote:
    Your posting can easily be discounted from now on. It is clear your issue with all this is politically motivated. You'd have been happy to see these men in jail because you disagree politically with them. Pathetic really and deadly dangerous to democracy.


    Its actually sickening to think people like that poster have no issue with how the state dealt with the Jobstown protest. Dawn arrests, grossly over the top charges and questionable evidence form an Garda. Ideology and party loyalty can be such a dangerous mix.


  • Advertisement
  • #937
    Hitman3000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    WinnyThePoo wrote:
    No need to get so personal Francie.


    Is he wrong? is your commentary not politically motivated?


  • #938
    WinnyThePoo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    Not at all, just love keyboard warriors such as yourself. The attitude of some at the result of the court case is an absolute disgrace and is worrying for our democracy that such a blind eye would be turned the actions of the state just because Murphy and people like him are not part a certain grouping in our society.

    Paul Is the hero . I get it.


  • #939
    VinLieger
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,332 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    Not at all, just love keyboard warriors such as yourself. The attitude of some at the result of the court case is an absolute disgrace and is worrying for our democracy that such a blind eye would be turned the actions of the state just because Murphy and people like him are not part a certain grouping in our society.

    What attitude to the result? Everyone has agreed with the verdict, I don't think one person has disputed it? Your simply unable to distinguish murphy's behaviour on the day from the verdict... hes been found not guilty fair enough but his behaviour was still thuggish and his behaviour since the trial has been that of a spoiled child whose not getting the attention he's used to

    I also find it funny your trying to separate yourself from the prejorative of being a "keyboard warrior"


  • #940
    VinLieger
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,332 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    Is he wrong? is your commentary not politically motivated?

    Is yours?


  • #941
    McMurphy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    WinnyThePoo wrote: »
    Of course. I have already haha. I walked past him in town recently with my friend. Pointed to him for my friend.

    ' Look there's a real life coward'

    He just walked on sheepishly. No doubt not having a mob

    He isn't a hero. He isn't working for the betterment of the working class. He Is working for the betterment of his FARFARFARFAR left political ideology. It trumps everything and everyone.


    ^^^^



    FatherTedDreamsreality_large.jpg?width=648&s=ie-325079


  • Advertisement
  • #942
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,692 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    WinnyThePoo wrote: »
    We have already had this talk about assumption francie.

    No assuming on my part. I responded to your 'political' diatribe.

    My issue with this matter has nothing to do with the politics of those involved.
    It has to do with the separtion or not of power.


  • #943
    Hitman3000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    WinnyThePoo wrote:
    Paul Is the hero . I get it.

    Your words, not mine. I don't agree with a lot of what Murphy stands for, water charges is perhaps the only common ground I have with hom. But I certainly don't agree with the attempted stitch up either .


  • #944
    WinnyThePoo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    FrancieBrady wrote: »
    No assuming on my part. I responded to your 'political' diatribe.

    My issue with this matter has nothing to do with the politics of those involved.
    It has to do with the separtion or not of power.

    You argue your assumptions. You keep doing it. I keep calling it out.


  • #945
    WinnyThePoo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    Rick Shaw wrote: »
    ^^^^



    FatherTedDreamsreality_large.jpg?width=648&s=ie-325079

    Random Paul Murphy Quote.



  • #946
    Hitman3000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    VinLieger wrote:
    What attitude to the result? Everyone has agreed with the verdict, I don't think one person has disputed it? Your simply unable to distinguish murphy's behaviour on the day from the verdict... hes been found not guilty fair enough but his behaviour was still thuggish and his behaviour since the trial has been that of a spoiled child whose not getting the attention he's used to

    What behaviour was thuggish, certain elements keep making this claim but as of yet have not described what this behaviour is that fits the defination of 'thuggish' maybe you'll give it a go.


  • #947
    Hitman3000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    VinLieger wrote:
    Is yours?


    No, not a member of any party or loyal to any political ideal. I've answered your question whether you accept that or not is your prerogative.


  • #948
    WinnyThePoo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    What behaviour was thuggish, certain elements keep making this claim but as of yet have not described what this behaviour is that fits the defination of 'thuggish' maybe you'll give it a go.

    We have already heard this line . Ignorance isn't an excuse .


  • #949
    VinLieger
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,332 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    No, not a member of any party or loyal to any political ideal. I've answered your question whether you accept that or not is your prerogative.

    Never accused you of anything but you're very defensive regardless.......


  • #950
    McMurphy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    WinnyThePoo wrote: »
    Random Paul Murphy Quote.


    Been covered already.

    Murphy can shout for a land of unicorns and fairies for all I care. It's not his political ideology that should be under the microscope here.
    Rick Shaw wrote: »
    This thread isn't about Murphy's politics, it's about him almost being framed by the state, on a charge that had a possibility of life imprisonment attached to it. A charge that almost stuck, only video evidence contradicted garda testimony, resulting in a judge having to resort to (I imagine it's unprecedented) ordering the jury to concentrate on video evidence, as opposed to the gards testimonies, as what was on video contradicted what was presented as being the truth under oath. (I would have to wonder if this is why the guards are wanting to make filming their actions illegal?)

    Only video evidence was there, Murphy and five of his cohorts could have been jailed, due to garda misrepresentation of the facts.

    That's a pretty big deal


    Murphy and his party are currently languishing somewhere around the 3/4% mark in current polls, and in Dail numbers.

    Pretty irrelevant tbh.

    But you go ahead and discuss Murphy, and Murphy's flavour of politics. It most probably is easier to swallow than discussing what looks like political and police corruption.


    Anyway, Murphy sidelines rabble rabble rabble, go on.


  • #951
    WinnyThePoo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    Rick Shaw wrote: »
    Been covered already.

    Murphy can shout for a land of unicorns and fairies for all I care. It's not his political ideology that should be under the microscope here.

    You havent answered the question.

    Should we let her go?


  • Advertisement
  • #952
    Hitman3000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    WinnyThePoo wrote:
    We have already heard this line . Ignorance isn't an excuse .


    So you can't describe what behaviour was thuggish either. Maybe you should Google what it means and then see if it legally could be used to describe the actions of Murphy. Thanks in advance.
    Btw who's 'We' do you not just speak for yourself?


  • #953
    WinnyThePoo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    [QUOTE=Hitman3000;104110026]So you can't describe what behaviour was thuggish either. Maybe you should Google what it means and then see if it legally could be used to describe the actions of Murphy. Thanks in advance.
    Btw who's 'We' do you not just speak for yourself?[/QUOTE]


    eh ..I wasn't asked ?

    We as in Public.

    Paul is still a thug and coward. He's just too damn transparent.


  • #954
    Hitman3000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    VinLieger wrote:
    Never accused you of anything but you're very defensive regardless.......


    Not defensive at all , just suggested you can either accept my answer to a question you asked or not. No need to feel you have to try and psychoanalise the response.


  • #955
    RustyNut
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,427 ✭✭✭RustyNut


    VinLieger wrote: »
    What attitude to the result? Everyone has agreed with the verdict, I don't think one person has disputed it? Your simply unable to distinguish murphy's behaviour on the day from the verdict... hes been found not guilty fair enough but his behaviour was still thuggish and his behaviour since the trial has been that of a spoiled child whose not getting the attention he's used to

    I also find it funny your trying to separate yourself from the prejorative of being a "keyboard warrior"



    What do you think about the actions of the other parties involved in the trial? Ie DPP, Gardai.


  • #956
    Hitman3000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    VinLieger wrote:
    Never accused you of anything but you're very defensive regardless.......

    Hitman3000 wrote:
    What behaviour was thuggish, certain elements keep making this claim but as of yet have not described what this behaviour is that fits the defination of 'thuggish' maybe you'll give it a go.


    I answered a question you asked of me, any chance you'd answer mine?


  • #957
    McMurphy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    WinnyThePoo wrote: »
    You havent answered the question.

    Should we let her go?

    What question?

    You're letting your apparent hatred of someone, who's political leanings you presumably disagree with fill you with so much venom that you're coming across as being incoherent now.


  • #958
    WinnyThePoo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    Rick Shaw wrote: »
    What question?

    You're letting your apparent hatred of someone, who's political leanings you presumably disagree with fill you with so much venom that you're coming across as being incoherent now.

    Are you talking about Paul here?


  • #959
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,692 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    WinnyThePoo wrote: »
    You argue your assumptions. You keep doing it. I keep calling it out.

    I am assuming nothing, your issue is with Murphy.
    Yea I know. All Hail Paul.


    The actual issue is 'the separation of powers' in this state.


  • #960
    WinnyThePoo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    FrancieBrady wrote: »
    I am assuming nothing, your issue is with Murphy.




    The actual issue is 'the separation of powers' in this state.

    That's all you do. You assume. You argue your assumption.


  • Advertisement
  • #961
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,692 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    WinnyThePoo wrote: »
    That's all you do. You assume. You argue your assumption.

    So you are just going to cling to repeating a meaningless phrase. Very good.

    You are constantly displaying a dislike of Paul Murphy. You already said you don't know him, so it cannot be personal dislike, so it has to be political dislike.

    That is irrelevant in this debate as I don't like Murphy's politics either, nor care to debate about them.

    The issue is about something bigger than one politician.


Advertisement