Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Rescue 116 Crash at Blackrock, Co Mayo(Mod note in post 1)

15859616364136

Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    I dont believe that the cost issue was dealt with as a moderator. (non bold text) Irish Steve did response with a comment along the lines of "we will all ultimately be paying for it".
    As you point out yourself the AAIU is funded through tax payer revenue. I think the issue is that at the moment perhaps we do not need to know the actual cost.

    And your point on the fishing community giving assistance and subsequent loss of revenue (as opposed to the voluntary work in free time of others) is a good point to remember.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭adam88


    do the insurers pay anything in these instances. I'd have thought they'd be picking up the bill to the limits on the insurance policies. It's not exactly an unforseaable situation that an aircraft may crash. I know aviation insurance is big big business and Ireland is a major player in such

    I'm not trying to be insensitive here either, just a practice question


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,035 ✭✭✭skallywag


    CHC themselves will certainly have insurance against such a loss.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    An addition question is how does the CHC Ireland contract handle the loss of an aircraft?

    A quick google shows CHC are not in great financial shape.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,769 ✭✭✭nuac


    Guys

    There are still two bodies to be found and waked

    That and support for the bereaved families are the priorities now.

    Time enough later for other issues.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,192 ✭✭✭✭Kerrydude1981




  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,882 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    Are we allowed to talk about the lack of SAR coverage in the east of the country due to the lack of helicopter coverage? I know of one specific case recently where a casualty had to be transferred the long way instead of being airlifted straight to hospital. That seems a rather troubling issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,276 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Tabnabs wrote: »
    Are we allowed to talk about the lack of SAR coverage in the east of the country due to the lack of helicopter coverage? I know of one specific case recently where a casualty had to be transferred the long way instead of being airlifted straight to hospital. That seems a rather troubling issue.

    Is that an issue with lack of Aer ambulance? Was it on the coast or land ?


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,882 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    On the coast.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    CHC have a reserve S92 which can take the place of the lost chopper. Therefore no loss of SAR cover.
    The air ambulance situation may not have been related. Over the years there have been multiple incidents like that where ground transport was used due to lack of /unavailability of air transport.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    At this point we really dont care about your opinion of the thread. We are very much aware that some of you are not happy. We are also aware of some other issue in the background that are not public (and will probably not be made public to explain the actions of the moderation team)
    The mods have made decisions which are not popular and have put them in a position where they have received some rather blunt PMs and posts about their personalities, IQ, decision making abilities and childhood schooling. So dont for one minute think we are making these decisions for popular thumbs ups or our own amusement.
    We recognise that in the absence of update on the search/recovery operation we feel the need to go a little off topic. But dont lose sight of the fact that the search for 2 men is still onging. That should be the focus of the thread.

    If ye dont like it then go elsewhere. Its a free internet on other sites. We don't have any influence or control over any other websites.
    Ye have had enough warnings about arguing inthread with very clearly stated Mod and Admin instructions.
    As stated previously any infractions have been for breach of rules of board.ie. Such as ignoring mod instructions, arguing with a mod in thread, attacking another poster and/or trolling


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 569 ✭✭✭coillsaille


    nuac wrote: »
    Reply

    Just asking for some respect for the dead and for those recently bereaved in this tragedy

    To be fair, I would take it for granted that everybody on this thread has enormous respect for the dead in this tragedy and overwhelming sympathy for the bereaved.

    But it is an aviation forum and people would like to discuss possible causes from an aviation view point. Other people would like to discuss the logistics and mechanics of the splendid recovery operation, including cost and financing.

    However when those people attempt to ask such questions, even while giving due deference to the tragic nature of the situation, they get shot down as being callous or disrespectful or they get told to shut up and leave it to those involved in the recovery efforts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,314 ✭✭✭CardinalJ


    People are asking questions based on an inquisitive nature, not a lack of respect, empathy, sadness or basic human emotions.

    "Who is paying for this rescue operation?" can be interpreted as
    1) "I dont want to see taxpayers money wasted on a lost cause!" or
    2) "Its great to see so many resources being put into recovering people who would put it all on the line for us".

    Appreciate this is an emotive thread but bar one or two obvious trolls I think people can be given the benefit of the doubt and are going down the lines of option 2.

    Thats just my thoughts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,758 ✭✭✭weisses


    nuac wrote: »
    Reply

    Just asking for some respect for the dead and for those recently bereaved in this tragedy

    I wasn't aware a healthy adult discussion about various aspects of this tragedy is somehow disrespectful ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,223 ✭✭✭Macca07


    https://twitter.com/patmcgrath/status/846748873926328320

    So does anyone know what exactly is involved in a partial lift? Is it just enough to raise off the sea floor, or do they want to bring it to the surface?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,351 ✭✭✭Cloudio9


    Macca07 wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/patmcgrath/status/846748873926328320

    So does anyone know what exactly is involved in a partial lift? Is it just enough to raise off the sea floor, or do they want to bring it to the surface?

    I believe the intention is not to bring it to the surface, but enough to allow divers to check the underside of the helicopter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,268 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    <SNIP>

    If it was on of your family you wouldn't care about the cost of recovery.
    There are important things in life and for now, cost isn't one of them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 908 ✭✭✭scuby


    Tabnabs wrote:
    Are we allowed to talk about the lack of SAR coverage in the east of the country due to the lack of helicopter coverage? I know of one specific case recently where a casualty had to be transferred the long way instead of being airlifted straight to hospital. That seems a rather troubling issue.


    As far as I know (open to correction) the helicopter will not always complete a transfer direct to hospital. It really depends on the specific situation and medical urgency.
    Mountain rescue often complete rescues with calling in a helicopter. With R117 based in Waterford and R116 (rip) in Dublin, there would be sufficient cover.
    Hard to tell in absence of additional info


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Cloudio9 wrote: »
    I believe the intention is not to bring it to the surface, but enough to allow divers to check the underside of the helicopter.

    That's how I understood the strategy also. Although, I would be very leery of allowing divers to search beneath a partially lifted hunk of wreckage, unless it was lifted just enough for it to be moved a bit away from its current location so that divers could explore the area that would then be revealed. If not moved away, then it's underside is more of a job for the ROV in my view.

    I read a report elsewhere that flotation of wreckage that is in difficult terrain for recovery by surface vessels has previously been done using these open flotation bags, and the wreckage moved just above the bottom to a place where a surface vessel coul safely access it. In the context of The environment that has been described around the island, all such approaches make sense to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭adam88


    <SNIP>

    If it was on of your family you wouldn't care about the cost of recovery.
    There are important things in life and for now, cost isn't one of them.

    I'm putting my neck on the line here but rest assured financials are going on behind the scene. There's a pen pusher someplace keeping track of the expenses somewhere or other. Be it wages, fuel, etc etc. None of the organisations involved have a bottomless pit of resources.

    It's totally warranted that the search is continued, I'm not disputing that I'm just having my practical cap on.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    I see that the reporter providing RTE coverage in Blacksod has tweete that the fuselage lift operation has been called off for the day due to the effect of Spring tide...
    https://mobile.twitter.com/patmcgrath/status/846790689153265665


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 215 ✭✭Coil Kilcrea


    adam88 wrote: »
    I'm putting my neck on the line here but rest assured financials are going on behind the scene. There's a pen pusher someplace keeping track of the expenses somewhere or other. Be it wages, fuel, etc etc. None of the organisations involved have a bottomless pit of resources.

    It's totally warranted that the search is continued, I'm not disputing that I'm just having my practical cap on.

    And I would hope that one question being asked behind the scenes is how we the public can help through contributing to a fund to keep the recovery efforts fuelled and show our immense support and gratitude to all involved.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    And I would hope that one question being asked behind the scenes is how we the public can help through contributing to a fund to keep the recovery efforts fuelled and show our immense support and gratitude to all involved.

    We, the public are are contributing to the fund for the financing of CG, Navy, Garda operations every time we pay our taxes.

    However, RNLI operations are different if I recall, as that organisation relies on donations. Hopefully, we will all feel a bit more generous next time the voluntary agencies such as RNLI seek our help.

    https://rnli.org/support-us/how-your-support-helps/the-difference-you-make


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,490 ✭✭✭Bazzy


    It was on the six o clock news

    Basically they have attached a large ballon like object for all the world to the hull and are very slowly filling it with air.

    This is being monitored by Holland1 underwater machine and when they are happy it is stable to be looked at they will send in dive teams,

    I have zero experience in diving but I would imagine they wont nip down and go straight under it i'm sure they have a much better plan

    I just hope the two missing can be found


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,190 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    adam88 wrote: »
    I'm putting my neck on the line here but rest assured financials are going on behind the scene. There's a pen pusher someplace keeping track of the expenses somewhere or other. Be it wages, fuel, etc etc. None of the organisations involved have a bottomless pit of resources.

    It's totally warranted that the search is continued, I'm not disputing that I'm just having my practical cap on.

    The experience gained by those involved in this recovery work is invaluable from a training point of view and the agencies involved will be sure to use it in the future, the cost of it for this reason can't be seen as a plain simple expense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    Folks, I'm deleting posts, please keep on topic.
    Discussing any mod actions or other interesting places on the internet cannot be done on-thread.


    Thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 569 ✭✭✭coillsaille


    <SNIP>

    If it was on of your family you wouldn't care about the cost of recovery.
    There are important things in life and for now, cost isn't one of them.

    Posters brought up cost as a valid question. The recovery operation is a magnificent display of all that is good about Ireland, from the professionalism and expertise exhibited by our various agencies to the genorisity of our communities in times of need.

    Nobody, including those who asked about it, ever suggested the cost of recovery might be an issue. But people are pefectly entitled to be curious about how much such an impressive operation might cost and how it's financed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,261 ✭✭✭Gaoth Laidir


    This Northern Lighthouse Board guidance document below states these as the hazards and contingencies for landing at Blackrock. Quite a challenge at the best of times.

    Note: I am not implying that R116 was trying to land there.

    http://nlb.g2b.info/docs/GLA_Helicopter_Services_2015_-_CIL_Landing_Site_Register.pdf
    1. The helipad is perched on top of the Black Rock 300 feet above sea level. The cliffs drop away very sharply in the operational sector from west through north to the southeast. Take offs and landings must be carried out in this sector only. The rocky outcrop just southwest of the helipad causes turbulence, which can be severe when the wind is strong from the south and southwest. Wind strength and direction may dictate a requirement to use an exposure of up to 9 second’s.

    2. On occasions when the rock is unmanned pilots are to call Blacksod on VHF immediately before and after landing and before taking off from Black Rock and when safely airborne after take off. When there is an attendant on the rock he is to observe all take offs and landings and is to initiate emergency action by means of either VHF or MB radio in the event of a forced landing occurring.

    3. The aircraft must be fitted, and equipped with 406 MHz capable ELT.
    NOTE; PC2 is not achievable. It will be necessary to use up to 9 seconds
    Exposure at this site.

    4. Safety risk: XXX


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,105 ✭✭✭ectoraige


    What is meant by 9 second exposure in this context?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,592 ✭✭✭elastico


    <SNIP>

    If it was on of your family you wouldn't care about the cost of recovery.
    There are important things in life and for now, cost isn't one of them.

    Reality needs to return at some stage though. They can't pour money into it indefinitely.

    The money poured into this means the money for something else, maybe just as noble a cause, may be pulled.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement