WWX: Hogwarts goes to war

grumpylumpy · 21-03-2017 07:55PM

Because I was out at bowling and decided I could handle a kill order that I was pretty sure on (oops)

But not this kind of grilling

grumpylumpy · 21-03-2017 07:55PM

Deleted User wrote: »

Also you should know how many nights you have protected surely

I'm actually this disorganised of a person!

Triceratops Ballet · 21-03-2017 07:56PM

grumpylumpy wrote: »

Because I was out at bowling and decided I could handle a kill order that I was pretty sure on (oops)

But not this kind of grilling

ah so it was you who was bowling

21-03-2017 07:56PM

well is it 3 protects or 4?

Triceratops Ballet · 21-03-2017 07:57PM

dottie_lottie wrote: »

ah so it was you who was bowling

sorry "bowling"!!

y0ssar1an22 · 21-03-2017 07:57PM

i think we need to believe grumpy for now. if she is lying there would be a counter claim. if there is we can look at whos who then

mahamageehad · 21-03-2017 07:59PM

Hmm if grumpy is legit, then the person I have for BG I need to re look at.

don't want to say though in case I throw em under.

I'm voting QB or Raze. Haven't decided which yet. Or else one of the low posters. Haven't been able to pay too much attention today, boyfriends bday today and will be away lots of tomorrow too, that's why I couldn't mod. I will do a detailed post later tonight if I'm here after the lynch.

The_Valeyard · 21-03-2017 07:59PM

grumpylumpy wrote: »

I've to go out in about 45 minutes so I've made a decision.

I'm one of the roled villagers. Not sure if i should reveal which one but at least if you don't lynch me I'll be around another night to help.

My FFA2 would be Valeyard. Something about his says SK to me. I read through his posts, he has said little of substance, and had no real opinions on anyone (as much as its impossible to form concrete opinions in this game most of us put it out there).

Then onto MrsFD. I just find she's way over reacting to... everything! That might be her style but it seems over the top defensive to me
Mahama has been subtley defending qb a bit here and there which could mean there's two of them in it...

Maybe you are told, maybe you are SK?

y0ssar1an22 · 21-03-2017 07:59PM

gufc21 wrote: »

Im the safer play. Andys reasoning is shoit and im def an nrv which the priest will verify. Voting for grumpy risks hitting a rolled villager.

gufc21 wrote: »

Its not a double bluff. Im an nrv and no loss to village. I dont know what grumpy or maham is. Do ye? The lads came out so late there is no time to move from andy to anyone else without guessing. Im the safe play as im not a risk of hitting priest

gufc21 wrote: »

Im not playing mind games. It makes sense to vote me. You have created so much confusion by leaving it so late coming out. Infact having your whole group come out to cover ur ass so you can live another 12 hours and add poor raze to that list. Not to mention shortening the wolves peek list. Ye will be 2 down tonight wit sk and wolves taking ye out. Hows your group of 4 looking then? Clap clap.

I am an nrv kill me. Do not risk hitting a rolled player the priest will validate my claim in due course. There is to much going on not to vote for me and take the risk

gufc21 wrote: »

As i said i have no special role, killing me will not hurt the village. They have to expect that their core of 4 will now go missing soon enough. I dont know if grumpy is bad. I know your reasoning is crap. The priest will validate my claims in due course.

Im not offering myself as a martyr. I am at the hight of the list and i have no viable alternative. If i didnt die tonight the same would of happened tomorrow. Kill me now, start fresh tomorrow

gufc21 wrote: »

As i said i dont have any. Its why im asking to kill me. I tought grumpy and strawberry were in a room because of something last night where strawberry asked a question and grumpy fleshed it out straight away but in hindsite there is not much there.

I was so focused on you all day that i hadnt really been watching anyone else. I was convinced you were in a backroom and was prooved right, unfortunately it was the wrong one and there are now 5 certaincies on day1 that are gona be gone straight away. Good work that.

gufc21 wrote: »

Why on earth would you vote grumpy? What has she done to suggest wolf? What if she has a role?

gufc21 wrote: »

Ya. But i agree with mama tbh. Its to early to have enough on 3 people

gufc21 wrote: »

To be fair, its specifically the reason i asked him if he was playing last night. I've been there and the next day isn't fun . I'd give him a pass for today, but that's just cause i know where he's coming from and there is nothing really to suggest anything different

gufc21 wrote: »

Unless you are one of the gryfindor people then they aren't lying. Your still off the mark with me andy but unless raze says he is a member of gryfindor ill be taking you at face value.

It does make sense that you are in a back room given your post and that mick is with you given his posts. Its why i put both of ye in my ffa... again depending on raze's claims then I'll be moving from you but thanks to ye leaving it so late i know have to thrawl through 2 days posts to find someone else

gufc21 wrote: »

Ah come off it, ya Andy is griffindor but that doesnt mean he's right. Most of what i said for my reasoning on Andy being a wolf was more or less true, ie. He has a back room. Other than the fact he is now 1 of 4 confirmed good guys his reasoning for me is still shockingly weak.

I had actually thought grumpy and strawberry were in a room last night. I questioned strawberry's posts twice yesterday and both times grumpy jumped in to defend her. Im gona vote grumpy for lack of a better option this late in the day.

lots of gufc trying to save grumpy. i dont think he wouldnt have been so vocal if grumpy was actually a wolf.

or maybe a double bluff?

i dont have a clue

Amandadon · 21-03-2017 08:00PM

I would really like to the seer to look at sKeith I really think K he's possibly a wolf.

The_Valeyard · 21-03-2017 08:00PM

The_Valeyard wrote: »

Maybe you are told, maybe you are SK?

Told

Is roled.

The_Valeyard · 21-03-2017 08:01PM

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

lots of gufc trying to save grumpy. i dont think he wouldnt have been so vocal if grumpy was actually a wolf.

or maybe a double bluff?

i dont have a clue

I would have done it as a double bluff.

grumpylumpy · 21-03-2017 08:02PM

I'm sorry to drop the bomb but lads if you need to question me you've got 15 minutes! I'm en route to the cinema

grumpylumpy · 21-03-2017 08:02PM

I'm sorry to drop the bomb but lads if you need to question me you've got 15 minutes! I'm en route to the cinema

21-03-2017 08:02PM

grumpylumpy wrote: »

I'm sorry to drop the bomb but lads if you need to question me you've got 15 minutes! I'm en route to the cinema

is it 3 or 4 protections youve had?

Triceratops Ballet · 21-03-2017 08:03PM

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

i think we need to believe grumpy for now. if she is lying there would be a counter claim. if there is we can look at whos who then

youre post defending qb made me suss of you and now this makes me more suss, just cos there's no counter claim doesn't mean grumpy is genuine. Maybe she is maybe she's not, but the absence of counter claims isn't determinative. If there is another BG out there, and like mahama I had it down as someone else, maybe they're keeping it cool

The_Valeyard · 21-03-2017 08:04PM

dottie_lottie wrote: »

youre post defending qb made me suss of you and now this makes me more suss, just cos there's no counter claim doesn't mean grumpy is genuine. Maybe she is maybe she's not, but the absence of counter claims isn't determinative. If there is another BG out there, and like mahama I had it down as someone else, maybe they're keeping it cool

I'm Happy with running grumpy against mahama.

grumpylumpy · 21-03-2017 08:04PM

Deleted User wrote: »

grumpylumpy wrote: »

I'm sorry to drop the bomb but lads if you need to question me you've got 15 minutes! I'm en route to the cinema

is it 3 or 4 protections youve had?

2

Ectoplasm · 21-03-2017 08:04PM

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

lots of gufc trying to save grumpy. i dont think he wouldnt have been so vocal if grumpy was actually a wolf.

or maybe a double bluff?

i dont have a clue

Didn't GUFC then vote for grumpy? Or am I wrong (on mobile so can't find it easily)

It seems odd that they'd vocally defend and then vote.

y0ssar1an22 · 21-03-2017 08:05PM

dottie_lottie wrote: »

youre post defending qb made me suss of you and now this makes me more suss, just cos there's no counter claim doesn't mean grumpy is genuine. Maybe she is maybe she's not, but the absence of counter claims isn't determinative. If there is another BG out there, and like mahama I had it down as someone else, maybe they're keeping it cool

i went through the posts and tried to look at them completely unbiasedly.

i said we should believe her for now. if its bull$hit there will be a counter claim at some stage, in which case we re-evaluate

Triceratops Ballet · 21-03-2017 08:06PM

EMF2010 wrote: »

Didn't GUFC then vote for grumpy? Or am I wrong (on mobile so can't find it easily)

It seems odd that they'd vocally defend and then vote.

didn't it come down to only two then, if it was between him and her he wasn't going to vot for himself

The_Valeyard · 21-03-2017 08:06PM

dottie_lottie wrote: »

didn't it come down to only two then, if it was between him and her he wasn't going to vot for himself

Self survival, we have all done it.

Ectoplasm · 21-03-2017 08:06PM

dottie_lottie wrote: »

didn't it come down to only two then, if it was between him and her he wasn't going to vot for himself

Ah ok...I thought there were 3 people voted for

21-03-2017 08:07PM

Results:
gufc21 (11) - mahamageehad, grumplumpy, Strawberry Milkshake, MicksJaguar, Andy125, Lord TSC, quickbeam, EMF2010, MrsFlushdraw, Dan Man and dottie_lottie
grumpylumpy (4) - gufc21, raze them all, the Valeyard, amandadon
mahamageehad (4) - partyjungle, y0ssar1an22, sKeith, Uriel.

Triceratops Ballet · 21-03-2017 08:15PM

The_Valeyard wrote: »

I'm Happy with running grumpy against mahama.

It goes against what I've said today, but I think we should keep them both for questioning and look at people who weren't mentioned in the ffa.

I tried to get a convo on ffa going to see who the wolves would put forward, and now people are piling on those names. I think we need to examine people who didn't come out and who didn't get a crazy high number of votes. Obviously that includes me so I don't want to lead it but Mick what do you think?

The_Valeyard · 21-03-2017 08:16PM

dottie_lottie wrote: »

It goes against what I've said today, but I think we should keep them both for questioning and look at people who weren't mentioned in the ffa.

I tried to get a convo on ffa going to see who the wolves would put forward, and now people are piling on those names. I think we need to examine people who didn't come out and who didn't get a crazy high number of votes. Obviously that includes me so I don't want to lead it but Mick what do you think?

You know me,.id say examine the low posters. Wolves hide there.

y0ssar1an22 · 21-03-2017 08:16PM

sKeith wrote: »

we could thank the posts of the method we are in favor of to get a tally, post another method and it'll be thanked by those who favor it, then we pick most thanked method at 6.

looking for village brownie points?

sKeith wrote: »

#ffa1

mahama Some post earlier today put on radar for me
andy others have summed it up better, i think andy needs least explaination
grumpy the exchange earlier put on my radar.

I have to say that my reading of these so far is very flimsy and i am only posting 3 names as thats whateverybody else i doing.

a wolf following the crowd?

sKeith wrote: »

tell us what your onthread task was for access, then we can review thread. otherwise i dont buy it.

sKeith wrote: »

pj only did 4, how did he get access?

sKeith wrote: »

Mick only did 4 consectitive posts too. why you say 5 when its 4?

doesnt believe G3. trying to call their credibility into question?

sKeith wrote: »

seer should check uriel.

why?

sKeith wrote: »

althought her switch from grumpy to gufc helps her case

sKeith wrote: »

unless grumpy is bad that is.

sKeith wrote: »

just airing my thoughts from this morning, lynch is hours away, i flip flop like a pinball machine.

a wolf keeponh thier options open?

sKeith wrote: »

still, check uriel.

again, why?

sKeith wrote: »

Strawberry for leaving rta off list
rta for being off list
Dan man for not speaking much.

convince me otherwise.

sKeith wrote: »

my #ffa2
Raze. Being left of list of suspects makes me suspect. (brownie points go to FD)
DanMan. For attempting to fly under the radar for too long.
Mahamageehed. Still haven't shaken my original suspicion.

sKeith wrote: »

I was pulled up on that earlier, it was a tit for tat between mahama and FD. (I mistakenly recalled it as trit, but was corrected, thanks.)

quickbeam · 21-03-2017 08:17PM

So, are we still running with the FFA results? Me and Mahama are top two. Grumpy and Raze are tied for third - so run all four of us, or two? If Grumpy's included people can vote or not for her based on their own opinion of whether she's telling the truth about being Hagrid. Obviously, for selfish reasons I'd rather run four as it betters my chances, but if it's just me and Mahama then sobeit.

grumpylumpy · 21-03-2017 08:19PM

will be available for questioning in about 45 minutes. Putting in my vote from my ffa now. Willing to change later if there's a decent consensus

mahamageehad · 21-03-2017 08:21PM

Still on mobile so throwing it out there without the relevant quote to back it up but Uriel and me had a convo yesterday where he said he thought he knew who the SK was, thought it was in the top posters. Then the SK killed him. If grumpy is legit, then I need to reexamine all my "safe listed" ones. Not just the low posters.

Also I'm watching the first Harry Potter now randomly!

was the boyfriends choice, he doesn't know bout the game theme.

WWX: Hogwarts goes to war

Comments