Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Aviation video Thread

12122232527

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,156 ✭✭✭cuterob


    Watch this video, it looks like the first 747 is still on the runway when the other one lands, or is it on the taxiway already and then makes a turn on the taxiway giving the illusion of it being on the runway.

    Or would doing a go around be dangerous considering the BAe taking off? good video either way



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,627 ✭✭✭✭Reggie.


    cuterob wrote: »
    Watch this video, it looks like the first 747 is still on the runway when the other one lands, or is it on the taxiway already and then makes a turn on the taxiway giving the illusion of it being on the runway.

    Or would doing a go around be dangerous considering the BAe taking off? good video either way

    No video


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,156 ✭✭✭cuterob


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i50-FUjs_Dc

    fixed now i think, there is the link anyway if it isnt fixed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,058 ✭✭✭✭GBX


    Pilots eye view of B747 take off



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    cuterob wrote: »
    fixed now i think, there is the link anyway if it isnt fixed

    That works. If that's Heathrow, they have a procedure "land after", where the clearance to land is given based on the distance the previous landing is at from the threshold, and it's then pilot's discretion about if he lands or not. The BAE would have caused a few moments increased heart rate to ATC, but the separation would have been reasonable, and unlikely to trigger TCAS alerts.

    It wasn't that hard a landing, I've seen far harder, there was perhaps a lack of flare, but that might have been to do with making sure it didn't float too long and get too close to the previous landing traffic, as it was only just clearing as they touched down. Nothing unusual as such in the scale of things. Not the sort of activity that would be seen at Dublin, but they don't use land after, so the separations tend to be longer.

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,781 ✭✭✭weisses




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,476 ✭✭✭✭Oscar Bravo


    them wipers made me jump! great video though!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭Nforce


    Nforce wrote: »


    Footage from the other aircraft involved in the incident is below



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,789 ✭✭✭Bsal




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭vicwatson


    them wipers made me jump! great video though!

    When landing a plane took strength !:eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 727 ✭✭✭Lockheed




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭LaVail




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    That works. If that's Heathrow, they have a procedure "land after", where the clearance to land is given based on the distance the previous landing is at from the threshold, and it's then pilot's discretion about if he lands or not. The BAE would have caused a few moments increased heart rate to ATC, but the separation would have been reasonable, and unlikely to trigger TCAS alerts.

    It wasn't that hard a landing, I've seen far harder, there was perhaps a lack of flare, but that might have been to do with making sure it didn't float too long and get too close to the previous landing traffic, as it was only just clearing as they touched down. Nothing unusual as such in the scale of things. Not the sort of activity that would be seen at Dublin, but they don't use land after, so the separations tend to be longer.

    The 747 landings are on runway 06 at Schiphol. It is 3,500m long, so that's a good deal of separation. The 146 is departing from runway 36C or 36L and, in the event of a go-around by the 747, if there was a potential separation issue I assume ATC would have issued vectors and/or altitude restrictions to keep them apart. Use of zoom lenses in these types of video can suggest that aircraft are a lot closer to each other than they really are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,507 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    Very good video from Stobart Air.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,476 ✭✭✭✭Oscar Bravo




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,698 ✭✭✭tricky D


    Managed to be in the right place at the right time kind of by accident post NCT.

    EI-XLC Rossiya 747-446 EIDW 06-10-2016 15:35



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 121 ✭✭frankiebaby




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭Nforce


    Ex- Lockheed SR-71 pilot Rich Graham gives a brief rundown of Blackbird's cockpits...




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,499 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Takeoff from NCL in EI-SEV 737-700 if anyone's interested.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,499 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC




    Video of the takeoff of the A380 this morning, wasn't many around. Video not great quality but put it up anyway.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,499 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC




    Another takeoff from NCL, this time on EI-FAW.

    Tip for anyone flying on an ATR72, row 7 is not the best for videoing.

    Edit: Landing up too now:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,499 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Kuwait 777-200 landing at Shannon and Aer Lingus A320 takeoff.



    I promise I'll stop spamming the thread now honest!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,749 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed




    Sorry, but i couldn't resist :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,749 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    The only Lancaster that is allowed to carry civilian passengers. Based in Hamilton Canada.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,749 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭Nforce




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    Tiffy with a sticky nose wheel using the cable arrest gear and tail hook at RAF Conningsby.......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,499 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Three recent ones, more Newcastle and Dublin action.







  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,789 ✭✭✭Bsal




Advertisement