Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

TRADER'S CORNER

1242527293033

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,531 ✭✭✭BrokenArrows


    chompdown wrote: »
    You were saying earlier that you should stay away from trading oil so maybe best to avoid?

    I dont intend on trading it directory. But decisions made by the OPEC have knock on effects to the profits of other industries.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ixus


    Is there any reliable website which keeps track of upcoming OPEC events and scheduled announcements?

    The opec website maybe?!

    #OOTT also a good oil stream on twitter


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 187 ✭✭ftse100


    Anybody Trading on the Back of the Fed Decision later?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭For ever odd


    ftse100 wrote: »
    Anybody Trading on the Back of the Fed Decision later?

    Nah, as much as love action, I'm gonna sit this one out.

    The simple way I'm looking at it is...

    A) They don't raise and hint at a hike in December.
    B) They raise rates.
    C) They don't raise and no indication of hike in December.

    The next big focus after this, is the US election, so B or C would give a clear direction to the market regardless of whom wins.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,898 ✭✭✭dasdog


    Nothing on the table and no intentions to get involved right now. Not the most endearing comment from Saxo...
    We would like for Fed chair Janet Yellen, supposedly a labour economist concerned with inequality, to admit today that the Fed has been the chief driver of inequality by pumping asset markets while the real economy languishes, and that the Fed needs to hike rates to counter the risks to financial stability, not because of anything to do with the real economy. ZIRP and QE are driving inequality and the very real possibility of a Donald Trump presidency. But don’t expect the academics at the Fed to admit that they get this just yet.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭For ever odd


    ixus wrote: »
    Yes. And that's exactly what happened last time. The market got so ahead of itself the week before that we sold off from the Monday and got smashed when he announced the package.

    Vivid memories of the price action.

    I'll be more than happy to trade a repeat of it.

    With the FED giving an "A" last night, it looks like you're not the only one to follow last year's form.

    Do you think it can play out similar enough? (Barring black Swan event of course).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,063 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Yahoo has to be worth a short tomorrow....

    http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/22/technology/yahoo-data-breach/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭For ever odd


    Yahoo has to be worth a short tomorrow....

    http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/22/technology/yahoo-data-breach/

    Imagine the carnage If it was Facebook or Twitter and the likes...

    People will probably go out and buy the likes of mcafee, Norton, Bullguard and the likes, instead of the free ones they downloaded. Make em feel safer..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭For ever odd


    COPPER.

    Confined to wedge pattern on weekly chart since September last year, it is approaching the lower boundary, with not much room left to move either way.

    Possible breakout on the cards, which other asset classes tend to follow.

    Still in wedge Pattern, at the upper boundary this time. I have to take a short here, right or wrong I have to remain true to my analysis. Stop behind second last swing high.

    Some amount of FED speakers this week, including Yellen.
    Draghi and kuroda speaking also.

    OPEC meeting.

    Deutsche Bank is tanking.

    This week is a scalpers paradise.

    EDIT: First debate between Trump and Clinton, winner takes all, in my view.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭For ever odd


    From February
    Today was a non event in the oil meeting between Russia, Saudi and Venezuela OPEC . A production freeze at January levels 32.5/33 MILLION BOPD(which is substantial) is hardly a problem solving solution.
    It may in fact, just be a feeler, to see how other oil producing nations react to the news.
    A baby step in the long road to oil price recovery.... who knows, but in a standoff, whom ever moves first is usually the loser.

    Anyone think the US Frackers/big oil or Canada will freeze production? Can't see it happening just yet.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,784 ✭✭✭el diablo


    From February



    Anyone think the US Frackers/big oil or Canada will freeze production? Can't see it happening just yet.

    Definitely can't see the big Canadian oil patch companies freezing production. They're producing more than ever right now.

    Orange pilled.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ixus


    Opec know all this. Two/three ways to look at it.

    1. There has been a huge shift in policy by Saudi. They have given up on flooding the market to knock weaker out. They have also patched up relations (for now) with Iran.

    2. Supply right now is high. If demand remains the same and they stick to this agreement, with Russia, global imbalances will realign at a more rapid pace over next 12 months.

    3. Is it buy the rumour, sell the news? I'm not so sure. Look how markets rallied into previous freeze talks. That was with Venezuala etc making all the noise. We now have the big guns making noise and taking action. If, and a big if, they manage to co-operate, a lot of punters will be caught offside and there will be a reluctance to take big short positions from here through to opec on Nov 30th for fear Saudi double down.

    There is an air of disbelief amongst Traders and journos that this has happened. There hasn't been a cut since 2008. A lot of people may not have seen this before.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭For ever odd


    ixus wrote: »
    Opec know all this. Two/three ways to look at it.

    1. There has been a huge shift in policy by Saudi. They have given up on flooding the market to knock weaker out. They have also patched up relations (for now) with Iran.

    2. Supply right now is high. If demand remains the same and they stick to this agreement, with Russia, global imbalances will realign at a more rapid pace over next 12 months.

    3. Is it buy the rumour, sell the news? I'm not so sure. Look how markets rallied into previous freeze talks. That was with Venezuala etc making all the noise. We now have the big guns making noise and taking action. If, and a big if, they manage to co-operate, a lot of punters will be caught offside and there will be a reluctance to take big short positions from here through to opec onNov 30th for fear Saudi double down.

    There is an air of disbelief amongst Traders and journos that this has happened. There hasn't been a cut since 2008. A lot of people may not have seen this before.

    Yes, that's what I'm thinking.
    They have clearly giving up the power position and No need for others to rush too their aid, maybe forcing that bigger cut.

    In my eyes - 'You broke it, You fix it' will be the theme going forward.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭For ever odd


    FTSE 100

    If the FTSE does not smash through the 6960/7000 zone in the next two weeks, one would think that a triple top has formed on the weekly charts and possibly a double top on the monthly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭For ever odd


    If a week is a long time in politics, it certainly can ring true in the world of high finance
    My goodness, it feels like a lifetime ago (to me anyhow) since the presidenal debate on Monday to Yellen talking about buying equities if (when) things go bad on Friday. Sandwiched in between was the OPEC (Saudi) decision to offer a production freeze and the Deutsch Bank saga with rumours galore.

    To be honest I don't even know where to start evaluating the week, but the first thought that came into my head when I woke this morning - was there is a orchestrated effort to keep markets from crashing.

    So I am not even going to try, going to chill for a few days, starting with the All Ireland, gonna whack a few bob on Mayo as it's lashing rain all morning in Dublin.

    Enjoy the weekend lads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭iainBB


    If a week is a long time in politics, it certainly can ring true in the world of high finance
    My goodness, it feels like a lifetime ago (to me anyhow) since the presidenal debate on Monday to Yellen talking about buying equities if (when) things go bad on Friday. Sandwiched in between was the OPEC (Saudi) decision to offer a production freeze and the Deutsch Bank saga with rumours galore.

    To be honest I don't even know where to start evaluating the week, but the first thought that came into my head when I woke this morning - was there is a orchestrated effort to keep markets from crashing.

    So I am not even going to try, going to chill for a few days, starting with the All Ireland, gonna whack a few bob on Mayo as it's lashing rain all morning in Dublin.

    Enjoy the weekend lads.

    Spot on ., What a week I timed the drop in oil after the deal well ,but lost out due to Russia backing the deal and price raise again, amazing how news can mess with you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,898 ✭✭✭dasdog


    Another in agreement. I was reading about back testing data and what to include and equally important what not to include when devising algo's, one action is do nothing, don't execute. This is a valid action.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭For ever odd


    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-01/sept-11-widow-first-american-sue-saudi-arabia-terrorism-her-full-lawsuit
    On Friday, September 30, a woman widowed when her husband was killed at the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001 became the first American to sue the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in Washington DC District Court, just two days after Congress slammed Obama for siding with Saudi Arabia, overriding his presidential veto only for the first time in his administration, and enacting legislation allowing Americans to sue foreign governments for allegedly playing a role in terrorist attacks on U.S. soil.

    One wonders will Saudi follow through on their threat to withdraw monies (around $750billion)from the US if this got passed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭For ever odd


    dasdog wrote: »
    Another in agreement. I was reading about back testing data and what to include and equally important what not to include when devising algo's, one action is do nothing, don't execute. This is a valid action.

    What book are you reading? Be careful what data you are back testing, some can be unreliable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,531 ✭✭✭BrokenArrows


    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-01/sept-11-widow-first-american-sue-saudi-arabia-terrorism-her-full-lawsuit



    One wonders will Saudi follow through on their threat to withdraw monies (around $750billion)from the US if this got passed.

    The concept of sueing a government for terrorist actions just brings a whole new level of insanity of the US lawsuit happy stereotype.

    What courtroom would even be qualified to judge such a thing and where would it be tried? The US?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,898 ✭✭✭dasdog


    What book are you reading? Be careful what data you are back testing, some can be unreliable.

    Article is here. Author makes some great stragetic contributions which I normally have to re-read to better understand. I'm not using the technique, sitting on the sidelines for the past few days as I don't see anything of interest.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭For ever odd


    VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA SEPT. U.S. AUTO SALES DOWN 7.8%.

    VW on the weekly ready for a breakout to downside, this news could give it a nudge.

    With DB worries, short DAX could be a good set up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,898 ✭✭✭dasdog


    Interesting start to Friday for Sterling. Cable hit a low of $1.083 and was back above $1.20 in seconds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ixus


    That is insane. Also a flash crash in Swiss the other day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,898 ✭✭✭dasdog


    Shaking my head in disbelief at that one. My one min candlestick is showing a $1.083 low, I don't know if its a platform error as its not being reported that low elsewhere. Some serious damage done I imagine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ixus


    Certainly traded 1.18 area from twitter. People will be waking up wondering wtf happened.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 152 ✭✭beaner92


    wow that nuts, also do you guys use trading view uk? it would be a bit more live than boards.ie?


    Also anyone here trade s&p futures?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭For ever odd


    dasdog wrote: »
    Interesting start to Friday for Sterling. Cable hit a low of $1.083 and was back above $1.20 in seconds.

    I was thinkng of of putting in a buy order at 1.248, but thought it would be next week before it got down to that level. Lucky

    Fat fingers is the best Excuse they can come up with at the moment. Stop-loss triggers, and algo's.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/10/07/pound-flash-crash-sees-sterling-plunge-6pc-within-minutes/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,531 ✭✭✭BrokenArrows


    wtf is happening to the £

    Typical, just before im about to go on holidays. Haha.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭For ever odd


    Watch your screen at 1:30, see if the big boys are still playing... See can than they claw some losses back.


Advertisement