Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

First Photos with 80ed

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,448 ✭✭✭Wailin


    Better off to buy a second hand 450D and modify it yourself. I picked one up for €200 on adverts and followed this excellent guide here:

    http://dslrmodifications.com/rebelmod450d1.html

    Few hairy moments and is a bit tricky but the results are worth it compared to standard dslr.

    This is only 36min of data with modified 450D
    16322576878_94be9d5a45_c.jpgGreat Nebula in Orion by Tony, on Flickr

    There are a number of places that sell modified DSLRs such as this one in the UK http://www.dslrastromod.co.uk/products.html, but much more expensive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,068 ✭✭✭Iancar29


    Wailin wrote: »
    Better off to buy a second hand 450D and modify it yourself. I picked one up for €200 on adverts and followed this excellent guide here:

    http://dslrmodifications.com/rebelmod450d1.html

    Few hairy moments and is a bit tricky but the results are worth it compared to standard dslr.

    This is only 36min of data with modified 450D
    16322576878_94be9d5a45_c.jpgGreat Nebula in Orion by Tony, on Flickr

    There are a number of places that sell modified DSLRs such as this one in the UK http://www.dslrastromod.co.uk/products.html, but much more expensive.


    Don't suppose you know any other uk people that have nikon conversions?
    Wouldn't mind picking up a cheap body myself that i can use my own nikon batteries and lenses on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,448 ✭✭✭Wailin


    Iancar29 wrote: »
    Don't suppose you know any other uk people that have nikon conversions?
    Wouldn't mind picking up a cheap body myself that i can use my own nikon batteries and lenses on.

    Not too familiar on Nikon astro mods, definitely not as common as Canon but they can be modified of course. Don't know any sites unfortunately.


  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    M51

    Not a great photo but who cares, it's two galaxies colliding.

    m51new.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,252 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    Anyone know where/if i can get a dslr astro modified in Ireland?


    There's a guy in the UK does them. Cant think of his name but if you check stargazers lounge you should find details.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    New pier in the making


    IMAG0462.jpg


    IMAG0465.jpg



    IMAG0469.jpg



    IMAG0474.jpg


  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Needed more space to work around the pier so added some more stone. Fitted a single socket to power the mount, and a usb and data point in the other ip rated box.

    IMAG0513.jpg

    All tested and working well. Just need to get the neq6 mount from ktec, and figure out a way to fix it to the pier.

    IMAG0526.jpg


  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I've been busy trying to get everything together. New mount arrived while i was on holidays. Couldn't get anyone to make up platform for the mount to attach to the pier, so i got a set of skoda fabia brake discs, and got an engineering company to drill them for me. My plans changed re plugging the mount directly into the socket. Instead i have a 41ah battery on a float charge supplying the plexo box fitted with cigarette lighter, usb ports and voltmeter. Invested in a telegizmo cover for the mount which should give me much quicker set up times. I should only have to polar align once or twice a year. Pretty chuffed with how it's turning out.

    IMAG0652.jpg

    IMAG0676.jpg

    IMAG0674.jpg

    IMAG0664.jpg

    IMAG0672.jpg

    http://i804.photobucket.com/albums/yy330/setch3/Mobile%20Uploads/IMAG0673.jpg

    IMAG0669.jpg

    IMAG0670.jpg

    IMAG0668.jpg

    IMAG0677.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,068 ✭✭✭Iancar29


    I've been busy trying to get everything together. New mount arrived while i was on holidays. Couldn't get anyone to make up platform for the mount to attach to the pier, so i got a set of skoda fabia brake discs, and got an engineering company to drill them for me. My plans changed re plugging the mount directly into the socket. Instead i have a 41ah battery on a float charge supplying the plexo box fitted with cigarette lighter, usb ports and voltmeter. Invested in a telegizmo cover for the mount which should give me much quicker set up times. I should only have to polar align once or twice a year. Pretty chuffed with how it's turning out.

    Fair play! Jealous of the fact that you should only need to polar align once or twice a year! You must have some reasonably dark skies where you are to have a permanent setup like that?


  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Iancar29 wrote: »
    Fair play! Jealous of the fact that you should only need to polar align once or twice a year! You must have some reasonably dark skies where you are to have a permanent setup like that?

    Sky's ok here, as long as neighbours turn lights off. Should save time on setup, meaning more time for imaging/observing. I had the telescope setup in the kitchen and would just carry it out but herself soon got sick of the sight of it. My back will thank me for it too.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,419 ✭✭✭cowboyBuilder


    Wow !!!

    amazing stuff ... and these photos taken just by stacking long exposure images taken with a drive mount attached to cam+telescope?


    edit - OK now I see the rest of the thread with the pics of the gear ..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,419 ✭✭✭cowboyBuilder


    Wailin wrote: »


    Thanks !

    That's a good price actually ...


  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    First test image of new setup. Iris Nebula

    30 * 180 seconds at iso 1200

    iris.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,891 ✭✭✭Kersh


    Great to see how much progress you have made on it :)

    The AZEQ6 looks great sitting on that pier.

    The first photo looks incredibly promising, Im still using my ED80 too, great scope.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,419 ✭✭✭cowboyBuilder


    It really is stunning stuff, Im tempted to get one myself ... but I live in Barcelona :(:(:(:(


  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Thanks. Having it on the pier makes all the difference. I knew a few nights ago that the clouds were forecast to clear for a couple of hours. Normally i wouldn't have bothered setting up, but because now it takes about 10 minutes to start imaging i can take advantage of any clearing.

    I know i said i would never go down the ccd route, but i'm considering the atik 460ex. Would this be a good choice with my scope? Would it be worth just buying the camera, shooting mono for a while, and saving for the auto filter wheel and filters. I like the idea of being able to image while the moon is out too.

    You're right the az looks the part on the pier. Really is a good mount. I did a drift align and managed a 360 second unguided exposure with good results.
    This is 360 seconds unprocessed
    iris360s__25C.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,448 ✭✭✭Wailin


    Had the 460ex myself but used it once then sold it on due to lack of use really. Never got into the colour blending but used the H-Alpha filter from a very light polluted backyard in dublin.

    16398290420_e006d6d329_c.jpgCone nebula - NGC 2264 by Wailin, on Flickr

    16248750369_f9dd8dfa07_c.jpgHorsehead nebula in H-alpha by Wailin, on Fli

    These images were taken with a full moon as well. Had issues with the filter wheel leaking light somewhere too, obvious in the horsehead pic with the light gradient at bottom.

    Should probably have gave more of a chance and effort in fairness. FOV will be very restricted with the small sensor on the camera though.

    Use this excellent site to see what your fov will be with any set up http://www.12dstring.me.uk/fov.htm


  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nice photos Wailin.

    Added another 20*180 second exposures to iris.


    Lastiris.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,281 ✭✭✭jArgHA


    Cracking thread and images allinthehead. I was into AP many years ago (using film on SLR) until I parked the hobby for over 10 years, but I am thinking of getting back into it now (I just recently hauled my Celestar 8 SCT to Cork city).

    With all of the DSLR images you have posted in this thread, are you using a guide scope and auto-guider setup at all, or are you minimising the need for this by keeping light frame exposure times low enough that any drive error shouldn't have a chance to make an impact?

    I always thought that an auto-guider setup was almost mandatory now for deep sky stuff, but maybe I'm wrong...


  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Hi jArgHA, none of the images are auto guided. I use a goto mount. I have two, the eq3 pro i'm using as a mobile setup and with a rough polar alignment i can get 60 second frames without star trailing. With the az eq6 i can get 360 second frames, but this is on a permanent pier and with precise polar alignment.

    I'm trying to keep the complexity to a minimum as the clear nights are rare and i don't want to spend them trying to get my gear to behave, so i ordered a zwo asi 1600mm cooled, which will hopefully arrive soon. This new cmos cooled camera shouldn't need any longer than 60-120 second subs as it's unbelievably sensitive. Auto guiding not needed with this setup.

    Should you get back into the hobby you wont know yourself using a dslr. Can't begin to imagine how difficult this hobby would be using film.


  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    noelsorion%202.jpg

    This is a re process of old data. Noisy but it's only 60 by 60 second subs.

    BM31.jpg

    This is 10 by 180 seconds on M31. Framed badly, noisy, core blown out, but i was just testing the new permanent setup. Not bad for 30 minutes.


  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    First effort with new zwo asi1600mm.

    76 30 second exposures. I had problems with the cooling and getting all the software and hardware to behave but overall it's a decent result for such short exposures. Stars are overexposed i think.

    cygnus.jpg


  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    60 * 60 seconds at gain 380, offset 50. Sky quality was poor

    wallfinal.png


  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Opportunities for imaging have been seriously limited by the cloudy weather and that pesky super moon. These images are basically test images getting to know what settings and times to use for different objects. I've also just bought an astrodon 5 nm ha filter to image when the moon is ruining rgb.

    The horsehead is 6 minutes combined.
    Pacman is 2 hrs luminance but i used too low a gain setting
    Pinwheel is 2 hrs luminance
    Ngc1333 is a work in progress so far i've managed 4 hrs luminance 180 second subs. I plan to add another 4 hrs luminance and 6 hrs rgb
    Dumbbell is 3 hrs rgb ruined by moonlight.


  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    30894541510_a3457a9576_z.jpgjellyfishcalib5hrcrop by Richard Sweeney, on Flickr

    This is supernova remnant IC1443 or the Jellyfish Nebula. 5000 light years from earth.
    5hr exposure in 157*120 second subs. Darks 70, flats 70, bias 70.

    I had to crop it as there's a big blob of a star that i need to sort out.


  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Uncropped Version

    30521470524_4dd1c1434e_z.jpgjellystar by Richard Sweeney, on Flickr


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    30533702374_d729b0617c_z.jpgsoul by Richard Sweeney, on Flickr

    IC 1848 or the Soul Nebula is located in the Perseus arm of our Galaxy at a distance of 6500 ly. This large star forming nebula spans about 100 light years.

    7hrs 50mins with 5nm Hydrogen alpha filter


Advertisement