Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

QW Servers - Vote on Settings

  • 10-06-1998 2:33pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,049 ✭✭✭


    Do we go back to 2.10-type setttings or stick with 2.21?

    Let's have some ayes and nays here on the board.

    John.
    --
    Possible Settings:

    sv_waterfriction 1 (2.21 = 4)
    sv_friction 6 (2.21 = 4)
    serverinfo rj 1.5

    Barrysworld Settings:

    1. sv_friction 6 (old style physics)
    2. serverinfo watervis 0 (no water vissing)
    3. sv_mapcheck 1 (map checking on)
    4. serverinfo rj 1.0 (why not , apparently does not work on CTF servers)


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 880 ✭✭✭Von


    : Do we go back to 2.10-type setttings or stick with 2.21?

    Back to 2.1 settings please.

    : Let's have some ayes and nays here on the board.

    : John.
    : --
    : Possible Settings:

    : sv_waterfriction 1 (2.21 = 4)
    : sv_friction 6 (2.21 = 4)
    : serverinfo rj 1.5

    : Barrysworld Settings:

    : 1. sv_friction 6 (old style physics)
    : 2. serverinfo watervis 0 (no water vissing)
    : 3. sv_mapcheck 1 (map checking on)
    : 4. serverinfo rj 1.0 (why not , apparently does not work on CTF servers)



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 106 ✭✭FlavorFlav


    Hmm, I think a vore has to be a last resort to the situation. People in general need to be aware of the pros and cons and make a reasonable decision, Therefore there needs to be discussion.

    Some points for discussion.

    Go for new settings because they are the same as regular quake/winquake. (unified playing experience)

    What are international teams and big clans choosing? (dont want to always be an island)

    FlavorFlav



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    : Hmm, I think a vore has to be a last resort to the situation. People in general need to be aware of the pros and cons and make a reasonable decision, Therefore there needs to be discussion.

    A vote I presume you mean, although we can ask
    the Vore for a veto if you want.

    It's quite simple, go for the old feel (physics)
    of QW 2.1 or stick with this new hybrid version
    of the old QW 2.1 and WinQuake.

    Most people have played both 2.1 and 2.21 so
    should have a good idea which they prefer.

    Let's not confuse the matter and go into whether
    rj 1.15 or 1.2 is best for a rocket jump, we have
    the settings from Barrysworld so we can decide
    whether to go with that or not.

    : Some points for discussion.

    : Go for new settings because they are the same as regular quake/winquake. (unified playing experience)

    Well not much of a debate there, more of a vote
    for 2.21! At least we know where you stand Flav.

    : What are international teams and big clans choosing? (dont want to always be an island)

    Majority opinion in UK was for the old physics
    from 2.1 and thus Barrysworld changed. As for
    individual clans / teams, I don't know.

    : FlavorFlav


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    : : Do we go back to 2.10-type setttings or stick with 2.21?

    I like the old settings... but do the map check !!

    YUM


    : : Possible Settings:

    : : sv_waterfriction 1 (2.21 = 4)
    : : sv_friction 6 (2.21 = 4)
    : : serverinfo rj 1.5

    : : Barrysworld Settings:

    : : 1. sv_friction 6 (old style physics)
    : : 2. serverinfo watervis 0 (no water vissing)
    : : 3. sv_mapcheck 1 (map checking on)
    : : 4. serverinfo rj 1.0 (why not , apparently does not work on CTF servers)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    : Do we go back to 2.10-type setttings or stick with 2.21?

    Barrysworld aren't brill.

    I played on on one of the irish ones at weekend
    and jummp to mega health on mgduel1 was do-able.
    Ideally I would like to see settings when you
    can move about in mid-air like old QW (not
    realistic, but when was a game about killing
    ppl realistic?)

    Also, the easier to get out of lava on DM4 the
    better. New 2.21 is bloddy stupid in that
    respect. Rocket jumps should be old style too.

    How do you expect ppl to make new maps if ****
    game writers change the game while the map is
    under development?


  • Advertisement
  • Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 32,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    : Do we go back to 2.10-type setttings or stick with 2.21?

    : Let's have some ayes and nays here on the board.

    : John.
    : --
    : Possible Settings:

    : sv_waterfriction 1 (2.21 = 4)
    : sv_friction 6 (2.21 = 4)

    I think this setting alone may be causing ppl
    to think the servers are lagged. You do seem to
    slip about the place...

    No water hack and map check are fine by me.
    Also can ppl who have eyes and player models
    please replace them (I'm vaguely looking at one or
    two INC members here and one specific CT member.)

    As for the rest of the physics. Back to 2.10.
    If it aint broken, don't fix it.

    DeVore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 649 ✭✭✭Spoonman


    The new 2.21 gives me better pings 135 etc on good days and I get better fps from it too! I think we should give it a chance.

    : Do we go back to 2.10-type setttings or stick with 2.21?

    : Let's have some ayes and nays here on the board.

    : John.
    : --
    : Possible Settings:

    : sv_waterfriction 1 (2.21 = 4)
    : sv_friction 6 (2.21 = 4)
    : serverinfo rj 1.5

    : Barrysworld Settings:

    : 1. sv_friction 6 (old style physics)
    : 2. serverinfo watervis 0 (no water vissing)
    : 3. sv_mapcheck 1 (map checking on)
    : 4. serverinfo rj 1.0 (why not , apparently does not work on CTF servers)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,049 ✭✭✭Cloud


    : Do we go back to 2.10-type setttings or stick with 2.21?
    hmmmmm....
    : Let's have some ayes and nays here on the board.

    : John.
    : --
    : Possible Settings:

    : sv_waterfriction 1 (2.21 = 4)
    so the water is slower to move in, its slow ehuf in 2.1 ffs =]
    : sv_friction 6 (2.21 = 4)
    yes i think
    : serverinfo rj 1.5
    ????

    : Barrysworld Settings:

    : 1. sv_friction 6 (old style physics)
    i think that would be better maybe not too sure, seen as i got about 2 days of playing since i left
    : 2. serverinfo watervis 0 (no water vissing)
    allow it
    : 3. sv_mapcheck 1 (map checking on)
    off!
    : 4. serverinfo rj 1.0 (why not , apparently does not work on CTF servers)

    hacking of maps to be allowed!! i like seeing through the damn water, and so does most of the world =]
    leave the Rjs to the old style! its hard enoiugh to do em without having to learn how again (etc etc)

    someone made the point about getting out of lava was harder, cmon its hard enough without making it werse!
    also, anyone on IRC at 4 am for me to talk to =] =]
    ill shut up now
    SeP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,049 ✭✭✭Cloud


    Gah!

    Here was me thinking I was gone all ninja hopping out of the lava every couple of minutes in barrysworld last night!

    You had to go and shatter my illusions!!

    I reckon we should stay the same as barrysworld - most of us play both in quake.ie and barrys, so it'd be better if they had the same physics, esp if hibs're going to be playing english clans (don't want us to be misjudging jumps, swimming in lava and quad-rocking ourselves just cos of a physics change!).

    : Do we go back to 2.10-type setttings or stick with 2.21?

    : Let's have some ayes and nays here on the board.

    : John.
    : --
    : Possible Settings:

    : sv_waterfriction 1 (2.21 = 4)
    : sv_friction 6 (2.21 = 4)
    : serverinfo rj 1.5

    : Barrysworld Settings:

    : 1. sv_friction 6 (old style physics)
    : 2. serverinfo watervis 0 (no water vissing)
    : 3. sv_mapcheck 1 (map checking on)
    : 4. serverinfo rj 1.0 (why not , apparently does not work on CTF servers)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,049 ✭✭✭Cloud


    Pings wouldn't be affected Spoon m8, just the
    physics (move faster, jump higher etc.).

    John.
    --



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,341 ✭✭✭Koopa


    i reckon the new qw is fine with the default settings
    if its harder to get out of the lava,and you can get out with the new settings, if u play on a server with old settings it will be even easier for you
    BTW ive played on the new qw with default settings,(duh), and you can do just about everything you could do in the old qw, it just feels more like winquake
    And you dont keep getting tossed up wayyyy into the air each time a rocket hits you..
    this is a bit like the old "turn sv_aim on cos its too hard to aim otherwise" debate made by kiddies parents on IOL a while back i think..
    i doubt any international matches will be played with our side's "preferred friction level" etc in mind.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 649 ✭✭✭Spoonman


    Oh right :) go back to the old physics then plz :)

    : Pings wouldn't be affected Spoon m8, just the
    : physics (move faster, jump higher etc.).

    : John.
    : --



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    I agree with Dev on most of this except for the waterhack, please
    turn it back on, I didn't spend all those wads on my voodoo2 for nothing.

    Gandalf (In California)

    -Oh and btw the weather is sh1te over here

    : I think this setting alone may be causing ppl
    : to think the servers are lagged. You do seem to
    : slip about the place...

    : No water hack and map check are fine by me.
    : Also can ppl who have eyes and player models
    : please replace them (I'm vaguely looking at one or
    : two INC members here and one specific CT member.)

    : As for the rest of the physics. Back to 2.10.
    : If it aint broken, don't fix it.

    : DeVore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    I'd prefer waterhack off myself and map/model checking.

    (Incude some unt guys in that list..esp. the one who put those models on my machines...)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    : I'd prefer waterhack off myself and map/model checking.

    : (Incude some unt guys in that list..esp. the one who put those models on my machines...)

    For the last time, it's NTS version 2, not a hacking of the eyes.mdl model AT ALL!!! :P It only slighly modifies the player.mdl to make lurking difficult.

    Thinker



Advertisement