Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Tomcat with Win2k (wrapper.properties)

  • 12-03-2003 10:22am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭


    I'm trying to configure Tomcat with IIS on a Win2k computer.

    If I install it to C:\Tomcat and set the value
    wrapper.tomcat_home=C:\tomcat in my wrapper.properties then it works fine.

    However if I install tomcat to C:\Program Files\Apache Tomcat 4.0 and set wrapper.tomcat_home=C:\Program Files\Apache Tomcat 4.0 then I get the following error when I try to start the service using jk_nt_service

    java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Files\Apache
    Exception in thread "main"

    I tried to put " " and ' ' around the location and also tried to set it to %CATALINA_HOME% but none of these worked, I couldn't even install the service.


    Can someone confirm for me that there can't be any spaces in the location for the wrapper.properties please

    thanks


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 347 ✭✭Static


    What version of tomcat is this? Try c:\progra~1\apache~1\

    barry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,031 ✭✭✭lynchie


    Dont install tomcat in a directory with spaces... causes more hassle than its worth. Using the 8.3 notation for the directory will work, but its just as handy to install to a directory like c:\tomcat


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭flyz


    4.0 is what I'm using,
    yeah I found out that I could use that notation afterwards. but like lynchie said it's more hassle than its worth :)


Advertisement