Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

History Of Israeli Non Compliance with UN

  • 28-02-2003 10:02am
    #1
    daveirl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,483 ✭✭✭✭


    This post has been deleted.


Comments

  • #2
    dathi1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,695 ✭✭✭dathi1


    How about we force Iraq to comply with resolution 1441 while militarily forcing Israel to comply with 242....
    for the first time I totally agree with daveIrl :)


  • #3
    growler
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,188 ✭✭✭growler


    presumably abstained because of our neutrality , makes you wonder why we were on the security council at all then !


  • #4
    The Saint
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,932 ✭✭✭The Saint


    We probobly abstained because we were told to. We have voted for many other resolutions on Israel. Also, all of the vetoes came from the US and the US only. Yes the US has done more to make the UN irrelivant than any other country but talk about it becoming irrelivant when they want approval on something.


  • #5
    Dancing Monkey
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13 ✭Dancing Monkey


    Sadly the difference is that Iraq has compulsary compliance resolutions passed against them, whereas there are no binding resolutions passed against Israel.

    So actually, it doesn't matter if they break them again and again.


Advertisement