Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

(US) Two-way Sat Internet now $49.99/mo

  • 19-02-2003 9:01pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,784 ✭✭✭


    You know the Gilat satellite Internet system that DigiWeb offer for euro 1808.95 installation plus euro 143.99 per month?

    Well, Gilat are also offering the exact same service in the US; it's called StarBand there ( www.starband.com ). Guess how much it costs? $ 49.99 a month and $ 699.99 for the hardware. Depending on where you buy, the hardware is also available free. Still not cheap, but compare that to what we are paying here, and it actually works out cheaper than Eircom's proposed euro 54 DSL service apart from the initial hardware costs. Why are we always being ripped off? :mad:

    (I have quoted all prices in this post inclusive of VAT or Sales Tax)

    Edit: I know this isn't directly relevant to Ireland, but I believe it is of interest nonetheless as it demonstrates that satellite Internet CAN be offered for less.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 234 ✭✭MagicBusDriver


    2-way sat will always be expensive. The cost of a transponder is too high making bandwidth expensive,I assume star-band are selling below cost.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,784 ✭✭✭Urban Weigl


    I wouldn't be surprised if they were selling below cost. From articles I've been reading, nobody in the US is prepared to pay more than $50 for broadband, so insetad of not having any customers at all (and thus no revenue at all) they'd rather cut their losses and hope overheads will come down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 510 ✭✭✭Nuphor


    I assume star-band are selling below cost.

    Surely that's as illegal there as it is here. To be honest, though, high power long range wireless solutions would be much more cost effective to implement. There was a post in here a week or two ago about such technology.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭SkepticOne


    Originally posted by MagicBusDriver
    2-way sat will always be expensive. The cost of a transponder is too high making bandwidth expensive,I assume star-band are selling below cost.
    Or they have written off some of their initial capital.


Advertisement