Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

nanotechnology

  • 03-02-2003 1:50pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,186 ✭✭✭


    Interesting reading:

    http://www.etcgroup.org/documents/TheBigDown.pdf


    It seems to me that the major barriers at the moment appear to be self-replication and finding a suitable power source. Not to mention the doomsday scenarios of "gray goo" where a rogue nanobot results in the destruction of our planet:

    GRAY GOO What if nanobots start building chairs and
    don’t stop? The self-replicating and assembly processes could
    go haywire until the world is annihilated by nanobots or their
    products. Gray Goo refers to the obliteration of life that could
    result from the accidental and uncontrollable spread of selfreplicating
    assemblers. Drexler provides a vivid example of how
    quickly the damage could pile up beginning with one rogue
    replicator. “If the first replicator could assemble a copy of itself
    in one thousand seconds, the two replicators could then build
    two more in the next thousand seconds, the four build another
    four, and the eight build another eight. At the end of ten hours,
    there are not thirty-six new replicators, but over 68 billion. In
    less than a day, they would weigh a ton; in less than two days,
    they would outweigh the Earth; in another four hours, they
    would exceed the mass of the Sun and all the planets
    combined.”45 To avoid a Gray Goo apocalypse, Drexler and his
    Foresight Institute, a non-profit organization whose purpose is
    to prepare society for the era of molecular nanotechnology
    (MNT), have established guidelines for developing “safe” MNT
    devices. Foresight recommends that nano-devices be constructed
    in such a way that they are dependent on “a single artificial
    fuel source or artificial ‘vitamins’ that doesn’t exist in any
    natural environment.” Foresight also suggests that
    scientists program “terminator” dates into their atomic
    creations46 and update their computer virus-protection
    software regularly?





    But 42 million silicon transistors on today's pentium 4 chip versus the possibilty of having billions of nanotubes in the same space sounds promising.

    davej


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,397 ✭✭✭✭azezil


    If nanities had a form of intelligence, sensors which made them aware of their surroundings and their own well being and could self replicate, would they be considered a lifeform?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,227 ✭✭✭stereo_steve


    With an attitude like that azezil, you could write a star trek episode. God knows its been done to death!

    I'd have to say yes. Self awareness alone even without the other qualities you mention would make them lifefrms in my opinion


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,483 ✭✭✭✭daveirl


    This post has been deleted.


Advertisement