Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Chechnya.Again.

  • 19-03-2002 11:45am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,446 ✭✭✭


    Just to keep awareness somewhat alive....

    I was reading the guardian and came across this: http://www.guardian.co.uk/chechnya/Story/0,2763,667329,00.html

    I read her book, "A dirty war" a few months ago, very interesting. Good to see things from a Russian perspective. Another good book on the conflict is "Crying Wolf", by Vanora Bennet (I think thats her name). The ingrained racism by Russians toward Chechens is perhaps the most striking factor out of that book, which unfortunately only covers the first phase of the Chechen conflict. Anyway, heres a few more links...thought it was about time that the most hellish conflict on earth (possibly) was brought to the fore again, now that everyone is harping on about "terrorists" and the West has stopped even giving token protest to Russia over its criminal war.

    http://www.hrw.org/press/2002/03/unchr031402.htm

    http://hrw.org/press/2002/02/russia0228.htm

    Might try finding a few more later on when I have nothing to do.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 772 ✭✭✭Chaos-Engine


    There was a piece about "A Dirty War" in a saturday section of an irish times about 6 months ago. I read a god portion of the book in Hughes and Figgs but had no money on me at the time.
    Very eye opening.

    But the most disturbing thing now is that America activly supports Russian action in Cechnya. Or at least turns a blind eye to it. The Russians are acting just like teh serbs did in Bosnia but the world doesn't know about it and doesn't care either.

    I had a russian guys of about 18 yrs of age staying in my house. He ran away from his little town in the Urals and got into Shannon college cause the army had conscribed him in. That means he would probably have ended up in Cechnya if his parents didn't have the dosh to get him into college. He can't return home until he is 25 or they will court-martial him and then but him on the front-line, and by the sounds of the war in the book I would favour permanent exile...
    The world needs to know whats going on....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭Clintons Cat


    The ingrained racism by Russians toward Chechens is perhaps the most striking factor out of that boo

    in the recent c4 hidden jihad program, there was an interview with an Asian DJ who went to Moscow for the Millenium cellebrations and ended up being arrested for being suspected of being a chetchen.
    Incidently most of the 5000 suspects,mostly of pakistan origin rounded up in america on sept 11 have now been released,or deported for minor visa irregularities.
    i'll see if i can refind the article.start here


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭Clintons Cat


    anything is permitted in the name of anti terrorism
    Since September 11, the Chinese government has stepped up its harsh repression of ethnic Uighur opponents of Chinese rule and others branded as "separatists" in the name of countering "terrorism", Amnesty International said today in a new report

    http://www.religionreview.com/?action=display&article=12636962&template=religionreview/index.txt&index=recent

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,672540,00.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    im of the firm believe that the bombings which started this war were infact russian in origin. i mean it was all to handy all together, and allowed an ex kgb man to take control who before that nobody knew.

    they never did catch anybody for those bombings did they?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,446 ✭✭✭bugler


    Anyone will do.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/elsewhere/journalist/story/0,7792,520510,00.html

    And look, Russia is getting jumpy about the prospect of war crimes indictments...

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/chechnya/Story/0,2763,672699,00.html


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,577 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Sorry for dragging up an old thread, but I found this the other day, it dates from 1999. Seems appropriate given recent events.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,894 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Yep, the actions of the Russian "army" ( scum in uniform more like ) are disgusting. They are little better than the terrorists they claim to be fighting in between bouts of drinking, raping, murdering, pillaging and torturing - I have trouble believing animals which would rape dying women can be counted as anything other than subhuman, PC or not.

    Prior to his election Bush seemed to be strongly against Russian actions in the region, going so far as to say that American money/economic aid shouldnt be going to the Russians whilst they were acting in such a fashion in a TV interview, but since then he has needed Russian aid in his war against terrorism, the latest being the UN politicking over the Iraq resolution. Whatever he may believe Bush is not going to rock the boat whilst he needs the Russians. Europe doesnt have its hands tied in such a fashion but lacks the ability to project influence - so the ordinary Chechens caught between two tribes of murdering barbarians will continue to live in hell on earth for quite a long time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    Originally posted by Sand
    Bush is not going to rock the boat whilst he needs the Russians.

    You mean like his being OK with the use of gas on a nations own civilians, resulting in deaths, because it was "fighting terrorism", whereas Saddam is a madman because he has used gas on his own civilians, resulting in deaths for some other reason.

    Yeah - the US have done a fairly big turnaround on the Russian approach to Chechnya alright, and its pretty obvious why.

    jc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,894 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Well Bush certainly has, Its just a pity the Europeans arent willing to step up to the plate and show some leadership on an issue.


Advertisement