Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Physicists only - Petition against new US Nuke Policy

  • 26-10-2005 8:53pm
    #1
    Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,857 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    Sign the Petition (Physicists only)
    http://physics.ucsd.edu/petition/

    The US had a policy of not using Nukes against non-nuclear powers it looks like they may change that.
    It foresees pre-emptive nuclear strikes against non-nuclear adversaries, for purposes which include the following (Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations, Page III-2):
    * For rapid and favorable war termination on US terms.
    * To ensure success of US and multinational operations.
    * To demonstrate US intent and capability to use nuclear weapons to deter adversary use of WMD.
    * Against an adversary intending to use WMD against US, multinational, or alliance forces.
    The Nuclear Posture Review document states that:
    *US nuclear forces will now be used to dissuade adversaries from undertaking military programs or operations that could threaten U.S. interests or those of allies and friends.
    * Nuclear weapons could be employed against targets able to withstand non-nuclear attack

    And lets be clear about one thing, the nuclear deterent did not save 50,000 American lives in either Korea or in Vietnam. So why do they want to be allowed to use it now ??


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭Crucifix


    That is awful. Has this already been put in place, or is it on the way?


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,857 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    in the final stages of being adopted and declared official policy by the US government, according to reports in the Washington Post and the New York Times (9/11/05).
    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,618 ✭✭✭Civilian_Target


    * To ensure success of US and multinational operations.

    They can use nukes to ensure the success of US Multinationals?! You cannot be serious...

    "Let McDonalds in - or we'll nuke ya!"


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,857 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    They can use nukes to ensure the success of US Multinationals?! You cannot be serious...

    "Let McDonalds in - or we'll nuke ya!"

    :rolleyes:

    Multinational Operations , not Multinational Corporations


Advertisement