Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

some techno from me

  • 22-10-2005 6:19am
    #1
    Helix
    Closed Accounts Posts: 17,661 ✭✭✭✭


    http://www.savefile.com/files3.php?fid=1395193

    let me know what yis think

    havent done techno for quite a while (almost a year),and this is pretty much as peak time as i could possibly make it

    kinda crossover sorta stuff in a way

    i havent been listenin to much techo of late, so this could sound pretty late 2003, but **** it


Comments

  • #2
    jimi_t
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭jimi_t


    Hmmm....Interesting name :)
    It sounds something you'd hear late at night on KISS a year or two ago, but it's pretty good all the same. The only thing I have a problem with is the synching on one of your rhythmn tracks. 0:56 there's a bass, hi hats and a kind of a "scwhip" noise that seems a slight bit out-of synch, too fast or coming in a small bit too early - maybe it's just me. That kind of hard techno really isn't my cup of tea but it seems very well produced, keep up the good work.


  • #3
    Helix
    Closed Accounts Posts: 17,661 ✭✭✭✭Helix


    its not out of sync, i just dont like rigid quantisation

    its sitting on the second 16th instead of the third, because it has more room there and gives a distinct groove

    cant stand stuff thats 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, 9th etc over and over again, theres no groove


  • #4
    jimi_t
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭jimi_t


    I dunno, fair play for sticking to your guns but the rhythm section sounds like it's trying to run away from itself. I find it painful to listen to.
    Anyway, I think you were going in a better direction with Retro Nuveau as opposed to this.


  • #5
    Helix
    Closed Accounts Posts: 17,661 ✭✭✭✭Helix


    each to their own i suppose, not something id ever change

    spose thats an electro programmers take on techno tho lol


  • #6
    DJ RichieParker
    Closed Accounts Posts: 81 ✭✭DJ RichieParker


    not a bad mix, fair play..


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Helix
    Closed Accounts Posts: 17,661 ✭✭✭✭Helix


    mix?


  • #8
    DJ RichieParker
    Closed Accounts Posts: 81 ✭✭DJ RichieParker


    sorry helix i meant tune, was in a rush last night, yea i like the way the tune builds at the start, starting a bit abstract, the first break is nice, a real sense of something gona happen, dont like the sound after the break, i like the keys underneath though, i dont know how to describe that sound you brought in after the first break, but i find it a bit harsh, but my take from that tune is that you can have harsh sounding tech sounds but have a nice thought provoking melody underneath to suggest an other side..

    Over all, cool


Advertisement