Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Jim Braddock

  • 12-09-2005 12:31PM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1


    I saw the film Cinderalla man recently which depicts the story of James Braddock (goes from number 1 lhw contender to living on the bread line, then get's a whack at the title and wins).

    I personally, didn't think the boxing scenes were choreograhped all that realistically but my friend disagrees. Aparently, Russell Crowe picked up a fair few knocks, concussions, cracked teeth and a dislocated shoulder during filming.

    Anyway, the reason i'm posting this here rather than Film is because it raises the usually questions about Boxing. Is it just dangerous violence, two men competiting for the viewing pleasure of sadistic onlookers or is a noble profession, calling on courage, determinition etc. etc.

    It also shows the brutality of booking during this era, 30s-40s. According to the film a couple of guys had been killed. Referee stoppages were really only after a few knock downs. Not like today, imo, were refs hop in asap if a guy is getting bulldozed, rightfully so in my opinion.

    Another question i asked myself during the film, if you were getting a thumping, why not fall down and take the count rather than try to scuttle about the ring? is it so difficult to get up once you go down? i've never boxed before.


Advertisement