Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Advanced Civilizations

  • 06-09-2005 7:02pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,858 ✭✭✭


    A couple of people in the other thread mentioned stuff about this, so I guessed it does deserve a new thread.

    I think there's a lot to these theories. A lot of the specific information I think is kinda silly, but the fact that humans have existed in the current state of evolution for several tens of thousand years, whereas our civilizations earliest roots is far less than that, plenty of time for a civilization to reach our level and disappear.

    Good link: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread111071/pg1
    haven't read it all yet, the first poster provides a lot of links at the bottom.

    Google 'Vimana' and there'll be plenty of information, and Charles Berlitz's 'THe Bermuda Triangle' has some information, but it's been a while since I read it.

    Also: Baghdad Battery, Antikythera Mechanism.
    These probably don't all contribute to one solid theory, but they are all indications that ancient technology might have more to it than we think.

    EDIT: http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_7.htm#Ancient%20Indian

    This is about Vimanas, also has pages on Piri Reis map, Antikythera &c.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    6, July, 1960
    Subject: Admiral Piri Reis Map
    TO: Prof. Charles H. Hapgood
    Keene College
    Keene, New Hampshire


    Dear Professor Hapgood,
    Your request of evaluation of certain unusual features of the Piri Reis map of 1513 by this organization has been reviewed.
    The claim that the lower part of the map portrays the Princess Martha Coast of Queen Maud Land, Antarctic, and the Palmer Peninsular, is reasonable. We find that this is the most logical and in all probability the correct interpretation of the map.
    The geographical detail shown in the lower part of the map agrees very remarkably with the results of the seismic profile made across the top of the ice-cap by the Swedish-British Antarctic Expedition of 1949.
    This indicates the coastline had been mapped before it was covered by the ice-cap.
    The ice-cap in this region is now about a mile thick.
    We have no idea how the data on this map can be reconciled with the supposed state of geographical knowledge in 1513.

    Harold Z. Ohlmeyer Lt. Colonel, USAF Commander


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,235 ✭✭✭iregk


    well there is a lot of talk about atlantis and the mayan tribes to name but two. the thing is what defines advanced? technology of level of conciousness (aware ness)? being able to make anti grav machines, does this make you more advanced than a civilisation that feels they dont need them as they have reached a much higher level of awareness and one ness?

    me personally i think we are no where near the most advanced that has ever graced this earth. other civilisations not only knew so much more about the stars than we did but were on a different existance entirely when it came to conciousness and awareness. we live in a very material world where the rat race is ever important what wouldn't we give to live in a utopian world where in our minds we are so aware. for me that is advanced...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,858 ✭✭✭Undergod


    That's a good point, but I did originally mean technologically advanced.

    I find it hard to believe some of the Atlantis theories. Also I have read stuff on Mu/Lemuria, which was about spiritual advancement and was really... silly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11 Hypatia


    [/QUOTE]Also: Baghdad Battery, Antikythera Mechanism.
    These probably don't all contribute to one solid theory, but they are all indications that ancient technology might have more to it than we think.

    EDIT: http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_7.htm#Ancient%20Indian

    This is about Vimanas, also has pages on Piri Reis map, Antikythera &c.[/QUOTE]


    I see you mention the Antikythera mechanism.

    A suggestion. Take a look a the peer reviewed research that is presently being done on that mechanism. You may get a shock at just how advanced the engineering was. It was equivalent to clock engineering at end of the 18th and start of the 19th centuries.

    http://www.antikythera-mechanism.gr/

    I also suggest you take a look at the research paper that was published in nature regarding this mechanism.

    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7119/abs/nature05357.html
    and
    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7119/full/444534a.html

    It is not some new fantasy or conspiracy theory. It is pure hard scientific fact and a lot more unbelieveable than anything people have claimed.

    On a personal note, I think every student at school should be shown a model of this, to let them know what anti-science and what fundementalism can destroy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,553 ✭✭✭Ekancone


    Undergod wrote:
    That's a good point, but I did originally mean technologically advanced.

    I find it hard to believe some of the Atlantis theories. Also I have read stuff on Mu/Lemuria, which was about spiritual advancement and was really... silly.


    how do you define that?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,858 ✭✭✭Undergod


    Having advanced technology, more sophisticated in terms of science and engineering. I think. It has been two years like, so I'm not entirely sure.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement