Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

[Article] 15% of new bus routes in Dublin may be privatised

  • 02-08-2005 4:43am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,580 ✭✭✭✭


    http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/front/2005/0802/3633736326HM1BOTTOM.html
    15% of new bus routes in Dublin may be privatised

    The Department of Transport is in advanced talks with trade unions and transport companies on major reforms for the bus sector which are expected to see 15 per cent of new routes in Dublin being privatised, writes Liam Reid, Political Reporter.

    The package also provides for plans by Minister for Transport Martin Cullen to establish a new transport commissioner to regulate the bus and rail sectors.

    The commissioner would oversee fares, routes and timetables for both public and private bus companies.

    He or she would take over the licensing of all new bus routes, which will be open for tender by both public and private companies.

    The new regulator would also have the power to impose heavy fines on companies, including State-owned operators, who fail to adhere to routes and agreed timetables.

    The package will also include extra investment for Dublin Bus and Bus Éireann to buy additional buses for new routes.

    While agreement has yet to be reached, those close to the negotiations believe that a deal could be brokered by the end of next month.

    Mr Cullen is expected to hold meetings directly with union and transport company representatives with a view to having a deal completed by then.

    Negotiations are currently centred on an interim package for new routes in the Dublin region, which would precede the establishment of a regulator.

    Officials are anxious that a specific quota of the new routes to be established this year and next year must go to private operators.

    While no exact figure has been agreed, it is expected 15 per cent of new routes will be awarded to private operators.

    Dublin Bus is also engaged in a major review of its bus routes, and will bring forward plans for new routes throughout the city in November.

    It is expected that it will also cut services on a number of lesser- used routes, especially those along Luas lines.

    Government investment for 150 buses for new routes in Dublin would be conditional on a deal on the privatisation of some new routes.

    The Government has been withholding funding for additional buses for Dublin Bus since 2002, a decision that has been widely criticised by unions and Opposition parties.

    Dublin Bus commissioned a study earlier this year by DKM consultants. It found that some areas of the city, such as Blanchardstown, will experience population growth rates of more than 30 per cent between 2002 and 2016, and that the bus network will be the only effective means of servicing many of these high-growth areas because of a lack of rail facilities.

    Once the regulator is established, it is envisaged that all new bus routes will be put out to tender, and that Dublin Bus and Bus Éireann will also be able to tender for the routes.

    It is also expected that the regulator may decide on the level of State subsidies for specific routes that would not be profitable to operate.

    Mr Cullen is also considering plans for the creation of a transport "tsar" to regulate all public transport, including aviation and taxis, once the public transport commissioner's office is established.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,698 ✭✭✭D'Peoples Voice


    Victor wrote:
    It would seem,
    and I know it's probably a bit premature to say,
    but we may be experiencing a freak occurance instance of a FF TD actually listening to experts rather than just caving in to Unions!

    Something tells me that Martin has been visiting this website
    http://www.compecon.ie/buses.htm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,761 ✭✭✭cdebru


    Well on my reading it seems like the Unions have a least partially been listened to

    IF this is correct it only refers to new routes so presumably the existing network for the moment at least stays in the hands of DB

    Also DB and BE are allowed to tender for new routes

    the 20% bandied about by brennan is gone

    It seems to me pretty much a return to the Deal that Mary Orourke had done with the Unions when she was Minister over 3 years ago

    So basically Thank you Seamus for wasting 3 years of everybodies time in which the Bus fleet has stayed the same size and traffic has got even worse

    If he had just gone ahead with the Agreement that existed with the previous Minister we would not have wasted the last 3 years for nothing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,168 ✭✭✭SeanW


    The thing I don't get is this: why fragment Dublin's public transport system even worse than it is today? Wouldn't it be better to have Integrated Ticketing and an integrated transport authority in place BEFORE the bus market is scattered to the four winds? Something like what TfL did for London. Or BVG did for Berlin over a century ago?

    But as usual here, our government has dither and bollox around for years and years before coming out with a useless solution, only to 10 years later look back and do a half-hearted fix. Crazy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,815 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    Who is actually going to plan the bus network overall? Or is there not going to be a formal planning function? (There is no planning function in law at the moment.)


Advertisement