Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Request for criticism (rfc)

  • 27-07-2005 6:02pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,297 ✭✭✭


    Please see attached holiday photos taken with my new Canon 350 D and the kit lens. I would value any comments you wish to make.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,225 ✭✭✭JackKelly


    wow.nice photos. Great subject in all of them. They seem to be a little soft though. Maybe it's just the kit lens.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 489 ✭✭derek27


    vibrant!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭DotOrg


    TimAy wrote:
    They seem to be a little soft though. Maybe it's just the kit lens.
    i'd say most were taken at least above f5.6 and there's very little difference between the kit lens and L lenses in those conditions. they would, as all shots from dSLR's do, need a little tweaking with unsharp mask in PS

    for me, the shots are all fairly bland, nothing jumps out and makes me go wow in any of them. they're better than the average holiday snapshot but nothing i'd want to hang on my wall. just my opinion

    for some critical opinions on photo's i'd use photo.net if you want honest opinions and reflections on your photos. you'll learn a lot there for example on how to improve


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,645 ✭✭✭Shrimp


    i cant say i like the photos. The only one that really caught my eye in any way was the last one of the bridge. Altho I would remove the branch in the top right hand corner, make better balance.

    I also find that alot of those photos were to close to the subject. Not enough negative space around the subjects.

    Keep snapping tho.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭rymus


    Are they all a tad overexposed or is it just me? Maybe I'm just too used to shooting underexposed by a couple of stops... A little more shadow/contrast would be nice.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 365 ✭✭smileygal


    Here's a mix of positive and negative:

    Knight one is a cut above the rest!
    Great action shot and lots of detail and interest.

    I would crop that branch in bridge no 2 and the sign on the right in bridge 1.

    Motorbike one does nothing for me..

    I also find them under exposed except for knight.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 118 ✭✭cecilwinthorpe


    i like them all the only thing that i would do is chop the edge off the last one to get rid of the branch in the top corner. it was the first thing that caught my eye


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 472 ✭✭Metacortex


    The second image has potential, the moto image.
    You really need to get that into PS to do the usualy post processing to bring out the details and the colours.
    The rest don't really do anything for me


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,297 ✭✭✭joolsveer


    Thanks for the feedback. I will try to post some more images at the weekend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,297 ✭✭✭joolsveer


    Some more pickies from Languedoc for your views


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166 ✭✭waldo


    Looking at the shadows in the photos, most of the photos seem to be taken between 11am and 4pm - a time when the light is at its harshest and most unflattering (to every subject). During this time colours tend to look washed out (see the sky of the statue) and lifeless. The same photos in evening or morning light might be much better.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 365 ✭✭smileygal


    Queen is best of the batch. Cat one looks blurred and wall more noticeable than cat. McDonalds as a subject does nothing for me. Serpent railing is an interesting unusual find. If you can somehow get rid of the cars it would be better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,387 ✭✭✭JMcL


    DotOrg wrote:
    i'd say most were taken at least above f5.6 and there's very little difference between the kit lens and L lenses in those conditions. they would, as all shots from dSLR's do, need a little tweaking with unsharp mask in PS

    To get the best out of the kit lens, you need to stop down to f8 to f11. Wide open it'll be soft.

    As regards the pics, I'd agree with another poster WRT trying to avoid shooting in midday. You said these were from the Languedoc, the midday light down there is REALLY harsh. A polarizer would probably help a lot by cutting down the reflections from foliage etc, and improving saturation.

    The railings shot would benefit from a larger aperture to get smaller depth of field to throw the background out of focus. As it is, the detail just gets lost against a distracting background.

    John


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    You seem to be taking a lot of your pictures from a head on. "default", position, which makes them kinda bland. It is just like standing infront of something, so what ever you are presenting is just going to look rather ordinary.

    Next time, try and move around the subject a bit more, try and take shots using interesting angles and interesting compositions .. one idea is to try taking shots of something in the foreground with a far away background to give good feeling of depth. It is easier to focus the attendion of the view that way, especially if you use a small aperature (say f/5) and focus on a foreground object as the background blurs.

    You want to draw the view around your photo, from one object to the next.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,297 ✭✭✭joolsveer


    smileygal wrote:
    Queen is best of the batch. Cat one looks blurred and wall more noticeable than cat. McDonalds as a subject does nothing for me. Serpent railing is an interesting unusual find. If you can somehow get rid of the cars it would be better.

    Thanks for the feedback. I agree about the cat one BTW. The subject of the McDonalds shot is the girl, guy and dog. I particularly like the way the girl seems to be pointing at the fast food joint.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,297 ✭✭✭joolsveer


    Here are a few more shots for your comments.
    I have taken Dotorg's advice and placed some of my recent output on the photo.net site.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,297 ✭✭✭joolsveer


    Anyone for a MacFlurry? This is what I meant above.


Advertisement