Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Google Web Accelerator

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,317 ✭✭✭Chalk


    its a complete security risk,
    its taken down because people "could possibly" access your bank/email/forum accounts through it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 428 ✭✭Vunderground


    The first link isn't working there. Read the second for the first and below for the second.



    http://www.techsupportalert.com/issues/issue121.htm#gwa


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 428 ✭✭Vunderground


    If you read the material at the second link, that works it says:

    " To protect
    user privacy, the accelerator does not function during
    connections to secure sites such as internet banking."

    Hope this is true 'cos I like it!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,601 ✭✭✭Kali


    Chalk wrote:
    its a complete security risk,
    its taken down because people can access your bank/email/forum accounts through it.

    While I don't like the thought of external proxies from a security and privacy point of view, thats complete scare-mongering, and hardly the case at all... although if you can supply proof of the above I'd be interested to read it.

    This is the official reason from their website that its no longer listed:
    Thank you for your
    interest in Google Web Accelerator.
    We have currently reached our
    maximum capacity of users and
    are actively working to increase
    the number of users we can support


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,279 ✭✭✭DemonOfTheFall


    It's not scare mongering.

    TONS of people were reporting going to websites and finding out that they were signed in as other people. Google it. There was uproar about it


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,331 ✭✭✭Keyzer


    I thought it was crap. Some sites took centuries to open.
    Remoived the accelator and I was back to normal...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,317 ✭✭✭Chalk


    Kali wrote:
    While I don't like the thought of external proxies from a security and privacy point of view, thats complete scare-mongering, and hardly the case at all... although if you can supply proof of the above I'd be interested to read it.

    This is the official reason from their website that its no longer listed:
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/13/google_accelerator_suspended/

    theres even a thread around here about it.

    it does say theres no question that bank acocuntes were compromised,
    but the potential is there,
    so they suspended it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 428 ✭✭Vunderground


    Damn! Thats bad news 'cos I have found it speeds things up - particularly noticeable with Firefox and nothing troubling has happened in two day. Thanks for the feedback.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,601 ✭✭✭Kali


    Chalk wrote:
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/13/google_accelerator_suspended/

    theres even a thread around here about it.

    it does say theres no question that bank acocuntes were compromised,
    but the potential is there,
    so they suspended it.

    Excellent thanks.. makes good reading, gwa still didn't cache anything marked as no-cache or ssl/https content. Still if anything it should prompt sites to implement proper webserver configurations for dynamic user-based content.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,317 ✭✭✭Chalk


    while it didnt share the cached details of the types of pages you mentioned.
    the information has still passed through googles servers and may or may not be stored there.

    to highlight the need for people to be extremely cautious with cc numbers and bank details -
    yesterdays indo had a story of an indian call centre working for an english bank where the call staff were selling customers bank details for £4.50 a record.

    and if you read the related links on the register link i gave,
    theres an editorial about how google is redesigning the web to its own end,
    websites designed to maximise google ads potential /
    everyone using google to search - who decides the content now?
    and then web accelerator, google caching the pages and then sending them out,
    ie if you have google ads on your page, they can alter the ads to whatever they like,
    depending on pages youve been to recently , their spiders already read your gmail.
    google client and google server = google net

    its an extreme notion but one that should be taken into acount when potentially exposing your persoanl details to a third party.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    If you read the material at the second link, that works it says:

    " To protect
    user privacy, the accelerator does not function during
    connections to secure sites such as internet banking."

    Hope this is true 'cos I like it!
    boards.ie is not a secure site.
    everything you view could be cached like, private messages which may have others users bank details and phone numbers if you bought/sold stuff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 428 ✭✭Vunderground


    Got rid of it. If an Irish ISP would just be nice and give a 48mb dowload (or even 8 to be going on with) I wouldn't still be mucking about with this rubbish. Oh well, five years ago I wouldn't have thought we'd ever get broadband, but you know what I mean.


Advertisement