Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Fresh Install

  • 10-06-2005 12:41pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 133 ✭✭


    HI

    I'm going to wipe my hard drive in the next few days and do a fresh install of windows xp.

    I would also like to install ubuntu on the same machine and have a dual boot system.

    Which do you recommend I install first?

    Has anyone done this, i'm fairly new to linux so any suggestions would be welcome.

    Cheers
    JK


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    Install XP first. Linux will accept the fact that you may have more than one OS and configure a boot loader on install. Windows will not.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 94,293 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    If you are going to wipe the drive then you might as well nuke the partitions.

    Linux can read NTFS fairly handy. But even with captive NTFS I'd still be wary of writing to the XP system partition. A Fat 32 partition can be written to by almost anything handy for sharing stuff.

    have a trawl through the forum for recommended sizes.

    One option is say 5GB FAT32 for XP system, 1/2 the drive for XP data - you install programs here and backup the XP system to here , makes recovery of XP easier. Then install linux in the rest. Oh and backup the boot sector when before and after Linux install in case you need to recover from an XP fix or reinstall.


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Red Alert


    I'd say a small NTFS XP partition, a small ext2/ext3/reiser partition and a large data partition formatted as FAT32.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 133 ✭✭Jim Kernsey


    Thanks for the advice

    I attempted to install my Ubuntu 5.04 but it doesn't recognise my harddrive?

    I googled the error I was getting and apparently the hard drive i'm using isn't spported, so i'll have to have a look see for another distro.

    I was thinking of putting the whole lot as FAT32, is this a bad idea?
    I've 160gigs to play around with?

    Cheers

    JK


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 94,293 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    A single FAT32 partition is the second worst option IMHO, (NTFS being the worst) Linux likes swap partitions.

    Do you have a SATA drive ?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 133 ✭✭Jim Kernsey


    A single FAT32 partition is the second worst option IMHO, (NTFS being the worst) Linux likes swap partitions.

    Do you have a SATA drive ?


    Yes


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 94,293 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Well Knoppix 3.9 works detects SATA better than 3.8

    Post your PC/Motherboard/SATA card someone may have ideas.


  • Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 28,840 Mod ✭✭✭✭oscarBravo


    Ubuntu had no problem with my SATA hard disk and DVD drive. I'm using the Hoary Hedgehog release.


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Red Alert


    Your BIOS might offer the ability to make the SATA drive appear as an IDE drive. That's the only way I was able to install FreeBSD.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 133 ✭✭Jim Kernsey


    Red Alert wrote:
    Your BIOS might offer the ability to make the SATA drive appear as an IDE drive. That's the only way I was able to install FreeBSD.


    Worked like a charm.




    Thanks for all the advice


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭rsynnott


    Bear in mind that FAT isn't actually very Linux friendly; it doesn't do permissions. You DON'T want a FAT home directory.


Advertisement