Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

a couple of recent shots to critique

  • 04-03-2005 4:10pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭


    some photos from the Mike Got Spiked album launch gig last night. Any comments or thoughts?
    Taken with a Canon 20D with 24-70f2.8L


    IMG_1603.jpg

    IMG_1187.jpg


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 118 ✭✭cecilwinthorpe


    wow they're great i especially like the second one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 498 ✭✭bigred


    Nice shots, what sort of shot settings - primarily ISO - or did you use a tripod/monopod?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭DotOrg


    both handheld

    first one:
    iso1600
    shutter 1/30
    ap: f4.5

    second one:
    iso400
    shutter: 1/30
    ap: f2.8


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 693 ✭✭✭Gyck


    Tasty shots. Has the first been treated, or was that the lighting at the gig?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭DotOrg


    very little done to either shot apart from cropping


  • Advertisement
  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,533 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    nice!


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 11,362 ✭✭✭✭Scarinae


    I like the first one better, but the second ones great too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,231 ✭✭✭✭Sparky


    the second picture is deadly, they should use your first photo on there website or album sleeve, its cool :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,705 ✭✭✭BrookieD


    agreed, the second photo is the best, just heard though that fog machines are leaving a oil residue on ccd sensors on DSLR cameras after useage, might want to check it out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭DotOrg


    the second picture is deadly, they should use your first photo on there website or album sleeve, its cool :)

    the album cover i made for them is below, live shots are rarely good enough for album covers
    album_cover.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭DotOrg


    BrookieD wrote:
    just heard though that fog machines are leaving a oil residue on ccd sensors on DSLR cameras after useage, might want to check it out.
    if that happens with ccd i'm sure it happens with cmos sensors too but i'm pretty sure my canon is well enough built that it won't let in smoke as I'm usually a bit back from the stage. where did you read that though?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,705 ✭✭✭BrookieD


    Hi, sorry my first post has to be a grim reminder! As of 4 months ago I've jumped on the digital bandwagon from my Canon 35mm to my Canon 20d and it's been a smooth transition. I've been taking concert photography for the last 14 years with my trusty canon 35mm workhorses with no problems, but when deciding to try my 20d Major problems occurred. I won't drag out my tale of woe, but in a nutshell, if you take photos at concerts with fog machine use BEWARE! I'm always up front in the press area and am used to the FOG/fog juice leaving it's film coating on the lens/camera, not a real problem with my 35mm body, but I found out the hard way that it can wreak havoc on the digital bodies! After two gigs with my 20d the internal processor is fried! The canon tech said that the fog machines actually leave a coating of oil residue that not only coats your lens but seeps in your camera and will coat the inside of the camera as well-sensor/processor/mirror, he also mentioned all the 2nd hand smoke in the club isn't all too great for digital cameras to boot (his actual words were 'murder on the camera'). Unfortunately, OF COURSE, Canon's warranty doesn't cover this damage and I'm screwed as the cost in labor/parts would be near $875 as a conservative estimate, or in other words, might as well buy a new one.
    When I told him about what I do he also mentioned that digital cameras can be susceptable to low-frequency distortion from mammoth subwoofers at the concerts should you be foolish enough to be near them, as an fyi.
    I've used the 20d with supposedly sealed L-Glass both shows, I hope this helps others who take photos at fogged up clubs or concerts! As of now while I save up for another digital I'll be resorting back to the trusty ol electronic free 35mm

    This is from www.dpchallenge.com. a great site for digital camera users.

    Click for Thread on Above


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭DotOrg


    I've been using digital SLRs for over a year now and never noticed any problems. Surely if this was a problem then all concert photographers would have lenses ruined by the smoke as it's been used for years and I've never seen a problem mentyioned before but thanks for pointing it out, I'll investigate further and watch foranything strange happening on my lenses


Advertisement