Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ben Roethlisberger

  • 27-01-2005 8:00pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭


    Had, what you might call, an exceptional rookie season. Overall QB rating of 98.1, 66% completion rating, 17 touchdown passes, 12 rushing first downs, 2.6 avg on rushing AND the guys only 22. What do y'all think......

    Is Ben Roethlisberger set to be an all time great? 21 votes

    Yes
    71% 15 votes
    No
    28% 6 votes


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,929 ✭✭✭raven136


    he was amazing this season.The quality of QB's at the moment is fantastic with Michael Vick in my opinion being the best of them all


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,214 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    I picked him up for my fantasy league, and I intend to keep him. He was excellent this year, and should get better. He has that mentality that was evident in guys like Elway and Favre. Just won't be beat.

    Should be a great one...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,929 ✭✭✭raven136


    who is better tho.....him or Vick.Id go for vick simply cause you just cant contain his running game


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    2 very different players there, Vick is just an astonishing all-round athlete that will never be matched and Roethlisberger is more of a reliable pocket player (though he does rush when need be). That being said, Roethlisberger will only improve whereas Vick is in a dangerous enough situation with regarding (a) injury and (b) people copping on to his tricks. His style of game will lead him open to injruy and also, once defenses are game to his moves, he might be in trouble. So in answer to your question I'd say Vick, for now. But Roethlisberger has much more potential.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭Vikings


    I voted no. For the simple reason that it was not him who pushed the team the whole year. It was the team who were supporting each other. Yes, he did a great job, worth even more credit that it was his first season too. But I dont think he will become an all time great. I give him another 2 maybe 3 years of success before he starts to decline and will become just another QB.

    If it wasn't for the steelers exceptional Oline/RB's/WR's then Big Ben would probably not of gone 13-0 as a starter.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,721 ✭✭✭MileHighGuy


    Vikings wrote:
    I voted no. For the simple reason that it was not him who pushed the team the whole year. It was the team who were supporting each other. Yes, he did a great job, worth even more credit that it was his first season too. But I dont think he will become an all time great. I give him another 2 maybe 3 years of success before he starts to decline and will become just another QB.

    Think you are being way too harsh on him. I see him having a stellar career, 15 years, a couple of super bowls.

    Apologies, the boards app on my phone has dredged up 14 year old threads and I couldn't resist.... Some of them make for interesting reading!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 ✭✭✭BizzyC


    I think if you looked at his career stats/achievements in isolation you'd say yes, but he's existed in a very QB rich era so he'll always be overshadowed.

    Brady, Peyton, Brees are all time greats who have all played during the same era and have/are resetting all of the record books, you can't begin to compare Ben to this trio.

    Then you look at the 2nd tier of players during the same period; Rivers, Eli, Stafford, Ryan - Ben can be mentioned along side these guys, but there would be argument as to where he sits in the rankings among them.
    The fact that his name doesn't jump to the top of any lists for the period he's played in itself is indicative that he cant be called an all-time great, a real all-time great is generally a unanimously accepted thing.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,725 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    If you have to jump to the top of the period to qualify, then there is no all time great except Brady which seems odd with Brees, Manning, Ben, Rivers etc. I think he is consistently mentioned in that company which has to qualify.

    It's an interesting look at the old posts. Especially comparison of Vick, who went on to be the replacement to Ben at the very end of his career (and be terrible), the comparisons to Vick and Jackson today and you see how the Steelers' rookie is getting on today with a very good defense and very good OL..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,220 ✭✭✭The_Honeybadger


    Ben has had an exceptional career, two SB wins in three appearances, consistently among the best in the league throughout his career etc. He will make the HOF eventually, for me that makes you a great.

    I’d agree with the poster above that stated Brady and Peyton Manning are a level above Ben, Rivers, Ryan and Eli. Not sure about Brees, he might be closer to the second tier than the first, JMO, obviously he is exceptional but I think it’s generous to say he is as good as Brady.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,733 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Brady and Manning are clearly the best of our generation, Favre is in a 1a category a bit below them (although he is my all time fav QB).
    Then you've got Brees at 2a (despite the numbers, he's never really done a whole lot with them most years - SB excepted), then you have a host of guys as 2b. Ryan. Eli Manning. Rivers. I'd put Ben somewhere at the end of this group.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,778 ✭✭✭Big Pussy Bonpensiero


    I'd create another tier below Brady and Manning but above Ben etc. and put Rodgers in there. Haven't seen his name mentioned at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 969 ✭✭✭radharc


    Brady
    Manning...

    Rodgers
    Brees....


    Ben
    Eli
    The Rest imo

    Would put Favre in the previous generation but he was obviously top level too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,733 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    I'd create another tier below Brady and Manning but above Ben etc. and put Rodgers in there. Haven't seen his name mentioned at all.
    Good shout
    Rodgers is the steve young to Favre as Montana. Not as good as the guy that preceded him but a top notch QB in his own right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,220 ✭✭✭The_Honeybadger


    Good point about Rodgers I forgot all about him somehow. Russell Wilson is also better than Ben, Rivers etc and up with Rodgers and Brees imo


Advertisement