They seem to be starting young these days..

TwoShedsJackson

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/18967.html - a 13 year old boy has been put on the sex offenders register for downloading 300 porn pics including one involving a dog, and some featuring kids as young as one being abused.

I wonder when parents may realise that giving an adolescent boy his own comp in a bedroom may not be a wonderful idea in all cases?

--Kaiser--

Sick

Celt

/me is glad he isnt interested in that kind of stuff

Dont be at yourself

This may be a bit off topic....

While I don't agree with animal or child pornography (ie. pre-teen), I honestly can't see the problem with teenagers looking at porn. I can't figure out why there's such a big taboo about sex - its a part of life, its not revolting, corrupting or immoral so why are teenagers effectively shunned from it?

---

Fear can sometimes be a useful emotion. For instance, let's say you're an astronaught on the moon and you fear that your partner has been turned into Dracula. The next time he goes out for the moon pieces, wham! You just slam the door behind him and blast off. He might call you on the radio and say he's not Dracula, but you just say, "Think again, bat man."
hello.

Belisarius

Well Its just a thought , but if he was of the same age as the girls featured on the images, doesnt it fall under the bracket of Consentual sodemy ?. Im not detracting from the extreme perversion of the people who took theese pictures , but maybe It does alleviate the guilt of the boy in question , better same age than being an adult and looking up the filth ,I mean by that logic were all sex abusers from discretions in our teenage years .But as for the stuff with the one years olds and the like ,Thats just obscene

And whitelancer yer not fooling anyone mate *Joke...in bad taste no doubt*

---

Shrewgar!

Belisarius

Gah pipped me at the post Neks

Celt

You got me Bel

DadaKopf

ah, come on. he was 13, of course he was gonna be looking up child porn - he's a bleedin' kid for crying out loud!

Sometimes the law is truly blind.

Still, it's a genuine cause for concern but he shouldnt have been punished in that way. Perhaps psychologically treated or something - evaluated.

--Kaiser--

Well the some of the pictures involved children as young as ONE and also animals

he is not one year old, and he is not a dog

zeemoud

we can't blaim the kid he's just a product of our capatilist world , its all go go theese days. i bet hes the kinda kid where parents work all day 9-5, he has some stupid minder who minds him when his parents are at gala's or party's.

i guess once again we are seeing the smelly SH!T the "celtic tiger" can make.