Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Lack of HD services on Saorview - rendering it a bit redundant at this stage?

  • 18-10-2025 05:16PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 632 ✭✭✭


    I was just looking at the channel listings that someone had posted on the DVB-I thread, https://www.digitalbitrate.com/dtv.php?mux=MUX-2&liste=1&live=44&lang=en

    And it's a bit shocking to see that only 1 channel on Saorview is in HD i.e. RTE One.

    If they're going make it a useful service, it really needs to up its game a bit. It's not the 1990s and people really do notice low res video formats on tvs. Surely it should be possible to improve this? Or, is ComReg really hobbling it with a tiny slice of radio spectrum?

    I mean there are UHD services on air in France and Spain for example : https://www.digitalbitrate.com/dtv.php?mux=R9&liste=1&live=1&lang=en

    and by and large the regular MUXes are carrying better resolution services than Saorview, which seems to be just basic as basic goes.



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,932 ✭✭✭swoofer


    Have you got SAORview????



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,337 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    RTE 2 and TG 4 are also HD, plus RTE News broadcasts at a slight higher resolution than the VM SD channels, 704x576

    VM have chosen not to transmit their channels in HD format on Saorview due to the tariff for HD channels.

    Regarding the French UHD mux this was launched for the Paris Olympics last summer with 2 channels. It only carries the France 2 public channel now and a test channel, not sure what their future plans are for the test mux

    Germany transitioned to a higher spec to improve their DTT service a number of years ago using DVB-T2/HEVC



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,544 ✭✭✭galtee boy


    Im no spring chicken myself, so I'm not insulting the elderly, but it must be only a small minority of elderly people who use Saorview only for their tv. As a tv service, albeit for free, it's appalling, the lack of HD other than RTE/TG4 is a disgrace. If it shutdown in the morning, there would be a week of grumbling and that would be it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,644 ✭✭✭paddylonglegs


    I would be tempted to go with the low cost of saorview as the terrestrial tv goes on once or twice a week in this house, the rest is streaming (family of 5, young kids) we do pay for a tv service through Vodafone fibre but it’s not much more than saorview and freeview combined in my view.

    I hadn’t realised they didn’t broadcast in HD though. Does anyone know if freeview is still available in Ireland the way it was a few years ago?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,120 ✭✭✭Manc-Red_


    Have Freesat and Saorview myself and I’ll use Saorview for when Ireland are on in Football or Rugby.

    The Virgin channels looking like something from years gone by is unwatchable compared to what’s on Freesat UK for example though, surely that can be upgraded?

    Better Born Lucky Than Rich.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,337 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    Freeview overspill continues as before. Same with satellite overspill.

    The next 5-10 years could see changes to this if/when they transition to IP delivery of their channels instead of traditional broadcast.

    They have already launched Freely, the probable replacement for Freeview/Freesat. This will be geo-blocked here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,848 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    course it can, virgin media just won't pay for it.

    having said that I don't have fibre and got starlink several months ago so streaming works now. so have a android box to watch stuff which works OK now.

    My weather

    https://www.ecowitt.net/home/share?authorize=96CT1F



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,882 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    I use Saorview, Astra Satellite and Virgin streaming app. I get everything I need in HD for €0 monthly cost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 632 ✭✭✭PixelCrafter


    Freesat is likely to remain around until the current fleet of Astra satellites in that orbital position are retired - they may last longer but they are only designed to get about as far as 2029 to the very early 2030s. As it stands doesn’t seem like anyone’s in a rush to pre-order new capacity so my guess it will be withdrawn, or replaced with a very slim mostly BBC service to cover the few very hard to reach spots. There’s still a need for some kind of coverage by satellite.

    You can see it beginning in France already as Canal+ rapidly loses interest in satellite technology — the equivalent of Freesat, TNTSAT is already seeing decent channels drop of and be replaced by cheaper ones.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,120 ✭✭✭Manc-Red_


    Also on an android myself. Great stuff on that from the official sources around the globe.

    Getting back to Virgin on Saorview, who runs that - RTE?

    Better Born Lucky Than Rich.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 598 ✭✭✭sbs2010


    Obviously I'm a bit of an old fogie in this area but words like shocking, disgrace and unwatchable in some of the posts above are a bit OTT.

    I've got a satellite dish for the UK stuff and Saorview aerial for the Irish stuff and I've no issue with the Virgin channels or any non-HD stuff.

    Its just tv folks, its not real life. Not everything needs to be super mega 8k latest greatest, etc....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 632 ✭✭✭PixelCrafter


    To be fair, expectations of screen resolution have shot up. If you’ve a decent TV programming in anything less than 1080 looks bad - the bigger the screen the worse it looks. Sky News for example has imaging and onscreen text and graphics very obviously intended for HD - it looks bad in SD on Saorview.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,120 ✭✭✭Manc-Red_


    It’s not the end of the world or any of that but the SD version ran at that bit rate looks like tripe compared to what they stream out via their app.

    They can send out the SD versions at a watchable 720 but they are choosing 480 or so on Saorview.

    Life goes on and all that jazz

    Better Born Lucky Than Rich.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 632 ✭✭✭PixelCrafter


    Life goes on and viewers switch off. It has the vibe of a service that is only there because of some legal requirement to have DTT – it looks very underfunded and bare bones.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,931 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    In my opinion, the cost of transmission should be taken from the TV licence revenue and offered at a reasonable price to broadcasters, but any licenced broadcaster should be required to provide HD if they provide HD elsewhere. The government have really messed up on this.



Advertisement