Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Burglar Alarm Sensor Question

  • 25-07-2025 02:51PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,181 ✭✭✭


    My alarm goes off at random times so I'm assuming a faulty sensor. To find out which sensor is the issue I've opened up the sensors on the affected zone and closed the circuit by joining the black and red cable. I'll leave one operational until the fault starts again and then i'll hopefully have the culprit.

    All bar one of the sensors are as below without a resistor. There seems to be no problem closing the circuit on these sensors.

    1000022973.jpg

    One sensor has a resistor as shown below

    Normal.jpg

    I can close the circuit by putting the resistor between the cables as shown below

    Closed.jpg

    A few questions please:
    1. Why does this one need a resistor?
    2. Is what I've done okay?
    3. I assume that I will need to use the resistor in any new alarm sensor if that is the problematic one?

    Thanks

    Post edited by 2011 on


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,099 ✭✭✭Lenar3556


    It’s a monitoring resistor. The control panel looks to see the resistor is present in the circuit and will display a fault/tamper if the resistor isn’t present.

    What you have done to bypass the end sensor is fine. Those sensors are only about €12 each, so it might make sense to change the lot of them.

    Nowadays, every sensor would be on its own zone, so it would be obvious which one is at issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,181 ✭✭✭Comer1


    Thanks for the reply. I'm taking it slow to determine which sensor is giving the false alarms and it's going very well.

    I have a new issue now, the external sounder/siren got water in it on Sunday and now I'm now getting random tamper alarms even when the alarm is not armed. Can anyone recommend a replacement external sounder suitable for the Aritech CS350. I know that the Kinetic Aztech 220 is a good replacement but I can't find anyone who will ship to Ireland. Any help greatly appreciated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,099 ✭✭✭Lenar3556


    HKC Saab would be a popular one and compatible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,580 ✭✭✭kub


    The CS350 panel had to have 1 4k7 resistor connected in parallel with each individual zone input.

    Hence the logic there in the single resistor, it does not actually monitor the tamper of that particular zone though as 2 4k7 resistors connected in parallel at an EOL device would be required.

    Those particular Aritech GS612 Shock Sensors are no longer at €12 each.

    They are actually now closer to €30 per unit, i don't know of any professional still using them, the ideal replacement is the HKC standard sized Inertia Shock, that is around €15 incl vat.

    Also as per EN 50131 standards we are allowed to have 10 of these type of sensors per zone input, or say a mixture of shocks/ contacts but cannot exceed 10.

    It is wireless devices that have individual identification on Intruder systems



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,099 ✭✭✭Lenar3556


    Sure, although I never suggested that it did provide an integral tamper. That system could be heading for 30 years old. It would only be hanging on.

    On the cost, the bulk of Carrier business in Ireland (all that is left of it) is direct to a few installers that still use it. I believe it competes favourably with HKC. But any inertia that the OP can get his hands on should be fine.

    It may be permitted in the standard, but I haven’t come across daisychained sensors in 25+ years. Why would anyone do that? It makes far more sense to have them wired as individual zones. The OP’s issue wouldn’t arise if they were individually connected.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,580 ✭✭✭kub


    Absolutely but of course back then with a CS350 panel we were only limited to 6 onboard zones of which the first 4 were analysed.

    So we were limited back then and daisy chained was of course the way it was done.



Advertisement