Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

King & Conqueror [BBC]

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 24,069 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman


    They are going big after the Game of Thrones vibe there 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,304 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    According to wiki release date on BBC is 24th August.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,048 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    Or Game of Thrones went after big William the Bastid vibes.
    Seriously, hopefully this is good. Fascinating part of English history, especially after Harold just beat a Norwegian army two weeks earlier (Harald Hardrada deserves a show of his own).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,536 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    The march back from Stamford Bridge to Hastings to face William was in and of itself an incredible feat. Nevermind that he walloped the Vikings there and ended the Viking influence in Britain too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,107 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    I dont know how your supposed to know what is going on?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,021 ✭✭✭daheff


    seems to be on randomly on the BBC. Sunday and monday night at slightly different times. No idea when ep 3/4 is on? next sunday?

    story is a bit garbled too. a little difficult to figure out who is who and what exactly is going on



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,844 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    i found it good nice change from the tudors, but I do know who most of the characters are. and the usual historical liberties taken !

    My weather

    https://www.ecowitt.net/home/share?authorize=96CT1F



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 425 ✭✭Charlo30


    If you're not well up on the period you're going to find yourself confused at times as there were a lot of players. In terms of historical liberties, so far there no worst they other similar shows



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,013 ✭✭✭brian_t


    It continues next Sunday and the following Sunday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,787 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    There IS a Hardrada show, it's Vikings Valhalla, and it was cancelled just as William was introduced as a character, a child, at the end of the final season. I think they wanted to do one more season ending with the Battle of Hastings.

    I love the whole lot of TLK, Vikings, and VV and I see this as a spiritual continuation of those shows. I know TLK is a fictionalised story with the main character being a fictional person, but he interacts with real historical figures throughout, and there is some time overlap with the early Vikings series. Both TLK, Vikings and now K&C have the same throughline, leading to the BOH and the end of the Viking Age.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,048 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    I read The Last Kingdom series of books and would recommend them. As you say there is a solid basis of real history there, at the end of each book the author states things he may have made up or exaggerated.
    There is one book that is based in a battle mentioned in historical sources, it is basically referred to in one sentence but he built a fictional story around it.
    The Rest is History podcast had a good episode in April that gives a lot of background and context to the Norman invasion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,744 ✭✭✭Hippodrome Song Owl


    Watched the first episode of this last night. I'm reasonably familiar with the historical facts, but I found it very difficult to follow it at first in terms of who exactly everyone was outside the two leads, particularly the women. I spent half the episode on pause consulting the imdb cast list to confirm who was who, and then Wikipedia articles for the different figures.

    I did enjoy it though, and now I've figured out the details I'm really looking forward to episode two when I get a chance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,013 ✭✭✭brian_t


    If you watch this on BBC1 Northern Ireland, it switches to BBC2 this coming Sunday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59 ✭✭Romario11


    Finished this last night and it really did finish well and build up a great crescendo in the end.

    The problem was it was confusing as hell for a lot of it trying to figure out all these different parties. I don't think they handled it well in the early episodes. And then they throw in a Moorish ethnicity guy from Murcia. So I thought what's this lad from Spain doing here? But if you look up the Map it's Mercia which is north of Wessex where Birmingham is now. Unfortunately I didn't do that until episode 7. Nothing like a bit of DEI to confuse a viewer and scupper history!

    I would recommend whipping up that old map from that period, its gives you a better insight into everything and how all the regions interplayed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,304 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I'm still getting through the episodes, but finding it confusing, having to refer to the wiki page a lot. And I've seen previous documentaries on Hastings and the Normans. I can see a lot of people being totally lost. Maybe if shown in America they'll do a bookend intro either from a historian or textual - some sort of exposition as an intro to the episode on the state of play about the English 'earldoms', French duchies etc.
    I remember PBS America used to have someone doing a short intro for their British series to fill in some gaps for American viewers. Maybe these days they are just expecting people to google it.

    If they were going to do the focus on William and Harold, then focus on that and drop some of the sibling stuff.
    Or maybe only bring in the Normandy stuff after a few episodes.
    I think the acting is doing a bit of the heavy lifting in terms of keeping me watching through the 'middling' episodes.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 425 ✭✭Charlo30


    Completely agree on the sibling stuff. Thought they focused a bit to heavily on Sweyn. In reality he was minor player in the events and dead by 1052.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59 ✭✭Romario11


    Don't think this would fly in America, people would have no idea what's going on! I didnt even mention the wives and their interests which gets more complex in the latter episodes.

    But stick with it, it's rewarding in the end, and the reasoning behind the sibling stuff becomes clear, it's a vital part of Harolds arc. The acting is indeed fantastic. Eddie Marsan, what an actor, he pulls off Edward's simpleness just brilliantly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,304 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I plan to stick with it alright but I can see a drop off in BBC audience figures.

    I agree re: America so I was surprised to see it was co-produced with CBS studios. I wonder if they filmed extra exposition scenes for US version.

    +1 on Eddie Marsan, the intensity.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,787 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    I watched episode 4 last night, and it eventually all fell into place, all the pieces are set for the actual story to move into the battles. I'm not sure they needed to change the historical context (the reason Tostig reneged on his brother, the mad death of Lady Emma)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,744 ✭✭✭Hippodrome Song Owl


    I have watched to episode 6 so far and I have enjoyed it overall once I figured out who they all were. One key issue for me when I thought I was clear on who the women were, is the changing of the women's names since three of them should actually be Edith - that threw me off. Agreed also that the portrayal of Lady Emma's death was silly and that Edward Marsan was excellent as Edward. I think Clemence Poesy is also very good.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,259 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    If you've an interest in that period, David Mitchell's (very funny) book Unruly has quite a long section on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 425 ✭✭Charlo30


    What's irking me the most is the facial hair. In reality Harold had the mustache and William was clean shaven. Trivial, I know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,787 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    Yeah TRIH mentioned that on a recent podcast



Advertisement