Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Pay scale

  • 08-09-2023 9:55pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59 ✭✭


    Looking for some advice as the unions and payroll dont seem to want to give a straight answer when I query it and I have done a few times!

    Qualified with my PGDE in 2011. I had completed some subbing in my school in 2010 unqualified during my teaching practice so I was placed on the pre 2011 pay scale. I was told by payroll I start on point 1 not point 3 of the payscale as I was unqualified in 2010 when I subbed.

    From looking at circulars it states that pre 2011 qualifying you start on point 3 or point 4 depending on your degree length. Mine would be 4.

    So Im just asking is it right that I am on the pre 2011 scale with allowances but started 3 points behind everyone?

    Currently on point 12 as I didnt do any jumping of points as that was post 2011 scale.

    Its a mine field and I just want to understand it more I suppose. I just feel that I ended up in the biggest loser pile the year I qualified 😢

    Thoughts?!



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭petejmk


    It depends on how you were paid in 2010 - school or Dept. If it was paid by the Dept you would have had a payroll number. That payroll number would have stayed with you on qualification. I did something similar to you: Subbed in either 2009 or 2010 in primary (paid by Dept) and qualified in post primary in 2011. Started on point 3 of the scale. The payroll number on my first post primary payslip matched the one on the primary subbing slips.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59 ✭✭WWMRD


    Thanks for reply. I was payed by deot in 2010 when I subbed unqualified. Interesting....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,397 ✭✭✭✭rainbowtrout


    I've never heard of anyone starting on point 4. Starting on Point 3 was the norm. A teacher who was unqualifed started on Point 1, a teacher with four years started on Point 3, and I can't remember off the top of my head what Point 2 was, but it was somewhere in between.


    My reading of it is that when you became qualified and got a teaching job in 2011 you were put on Point 1 instead of Point 3, the argument by payroll being that's where you started.


    That is bullshit. While you were subbing unqualified in 2010, you should have been paid on Point 1, which is correct. Once you qualified in 2011, any work from that point on should have been paid starting at Point 3.


    My reading of it is assuming you got a job in September 2011 and have been in full employment since


    Qualified service years: Point

    2011-2012 3

    2012 - 2013 4

    2013 - 2014 5

    2014 - 2015 6

    2015 - 2016 7

    2016 - 2017 8

    2017 - 2018 9

    2018 - 2019 10

    2019 - 2020 11

    2020 - 2021 12

    2021 - 2022 13

    2022 - 2023 14

    2023 - 2024 15

    If this is the case you will be going onto 15 this year (assuming you had an increment freeze somewhere in the middle, so your increment is not in September). Talk to your union, give them the details of your employment. If the above is correct, you are on the wrong payscale point and should get back paid for all of it.



Advertisement