Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Would this work in Ireland?

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    There is exceptionally limited capacity on any trains operating at all currently. Counter-flow peak services to Docklands/M3 and Newbridge/GCD (which have to exist to run the busy flow direction ones) and some daytime services; plus the two cross country intercity lines that have very limited services and are already quite cheap. I'd imagine the expanded Cork commuter services might not be up to load yet either but I've no experience of them.

    All other trains are basically full.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭Girl Geraldine


    Unless there is a benefit to IE in doing it, they won't do it.

    IE won't want to do it because it will reduce their income significantly, and they will have to go cap in hand to the government to make up the difference.

    The government won't want to do it because they will be caught for the extra subsidy to IE. Plus, they will be loosing out on a good chunk of revenue from fuel taxes and motor tax.

    And the train only suits a small minority of commuters outside of dublin - those who live within walking distance of a station. And chances are, if it is feasible for someone to use the train they are already doing it.

    Anyway, a very large number of passengers travel for free on services already, whether it be free travel passes, business travelers who's trip is being paid for by employer, or the contingent that simply hop on and outright refuse to pay, telling ticket checkers to go fúck themselves and so on, with no conseqences whatsoever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Irish Rail will, eventually, be changed to a contract funding model rather than farebox + subsidy, just like Luas, Dublin Bus / GAI and other NTA direct bus operators.

    In that case, the NTA will entirely control the fares - not IR.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,814 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    CIE did something similar back in the 70s iirc, travel anywhere for £3.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭Girl Geraldine


    What do you mean by a contract funding model? How would that work?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    IR would be contracted to run the service, the NTA pay them the agreed amount to operate the service. Fares go to the NTA, if they are enough to cover the service, then a profit for the NTA, if not, then the NTA are subsidising the service, IR get paid the same regardless [1]

    [1] Of course it is more complicated then this, there would be penalties for services not operated, bonus's, etc.

    Luas has been run like this since it was first created.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭Girl Geraldine


    Well it is well and good doing that for Luas because its run by a private company.

    IR is a state company and a monopoly. What would be the point in tendering when you know the result, and they are going to come in with a heft price to run services so they can cover their costs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Because DB (Arriva), NS etc will bid against them. The winning operator would get the passenger rolling stock



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 371 ✭✭TranslatorPS




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,283 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I am pretty sure that this has already happened, and that IE are no longer retaining the farebox revenue.

    The NTA control all fares in any case, with the exception of the cross-border Enterprise fares.

    But on the substantive point about whether such a fare reduction would work in Ireland, you're correct. We simply do not have the capacity for it. Most trains are nearly full as it is, and the significant reduction in young adult/student public transport fares has had a significant effect in this regard.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    “IR is a state company and a monopoly. What would be the point in tendering when you know the result, and they are going to come in with a heft price to run services so they can cover their costs”

    I don’t think it will change, but it could change.

    I mean Dublin Bus and Bus Eireann were in exactly the same place, government owned semi-states that use to have a monopoly on their respective routes. But that has changed now, with GoAhead Ireland, a private company operating 10% of former DB and BE routes.

    Luas has proven that this operating model can work extremely well on rail, so it isn’t totally unimaginable that certain other rail service’s couldn’t also be contracted out. I think it is unlikely in the short to medium term, but the possibility does exist now.



Advertisement