Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Massive fish kill.

  • 30-08-2022 1:10pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,132 ✭✭✭


    The Glennagannon River in Donegal as been subject to the killing of over 2500 mostly juvenile salmon smoults,brown and white trout also. Totally devastating the River.

    Investigations are on going into the source of the pollution they said.

    Time to get serious about the penalties against the people who cause these destruction of rivers. Slap on the wrist isn't working.



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,035 ✭✭✭sniperman


    jail



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭Girl Geraldine


    Can;t be given jail realistically. Even if it could be proven who was responsibel, you'd have to prove intent, and even then it would presumably be their first conviction so they would not get jail. Even then, you could not jail a farmer because they have animals to mind and farm to run and family to provide for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,132 ✭✭✭malinheader


    So what you're saying is farmers have a get out of jail card if they do pollute a river.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭Girl Geraldine


    To be honest, that's the reality of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,132 ✭✭✭malinheader


    True. Not saying for sure yet it was a farmer, could be industrial. But as you said the reality is nothing will be done about this and it will happen time and time again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,900 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    If farmers get away with it its not because they have animals and families, compete nonsense.

    Having a farm to run and a family to provide for is completely irrelevant in terms of where somebody deserves to go to jail. No different to somebody having a job in an office, and a family and pets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭Girl Geraldine


    In theory yes. But in reality, if it did come to a situation where a court was sentencing, then the defencing barrister/solicitor will asking the judge to consider the mitigating factors in the case, and appealing them to suspend the sentence because a custodial sentence would have a disproportionate effect on the accused's family life and their livelihood, and they would effectively have to wind up their farming enterprise and sell off their herd etc in order to be committed to prison.

    And judges, being notoriously lenient, and prisons being overcrowed, would more than likely grant the request, unless there was some seriously aggravating circumstances such as repeated intentional occurences after warnings, or violence, or threats against authorities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,132 ✭✭✭malinheader


    Just an update , I was contacted by inland fisheries after my e mail about the fish kill and they have found the source of the pollution and are proceeding with a case for prosecution. No name could be given out because of the case pending but I was assured if the prosecution is successful which he says is nearly a certainty the name of the polluter will be published.



Advertisement