Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Mux with RTE1 has 96% signal strength, 0-15% signal quality

  • 25-08-2022 5:01pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20


    Hi, hopefully this rings a bell for someone here. Our LG TV had strong RTE1 and RTE2, both transmitters were working fine, and then our RTE1 went to hell.

    The signal tester shows

    UHF Channel 21 (474000 kHz) gives strength/quality as ~ 95%/95% (RTE2 etc.)

    UHF Channel 24 (498000 kHz) give strength/quality as ~ 96%/14% (RTE1 etc.)

    This is in the Clonakilty, Co. Cork area.

    I've powered off both ends of a single wireless handset, powered down a Z-Wave network and my mobile phone, none of it made any difference. The antenna amplifier has solid connections and is doing the job just fine for UHF 21.

    What could be the cause of the recently arrived terrible signal quality?

    Many thanks!



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,877 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Anything on 46 and 48? They are the channels on the local low power Clonakilty transmitter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 watou


    Thank you very much for your reply. Unfortuntely both come in at 0% signal with the current setup. I didn't realise there was such a nearby transmitter, but the Saorview tool here says the transmitter to serve our location is 45km away. Even though the 46,48 transmitter is only 4km away, could the lay of the land be such that it would be hopeless to install an aerial outside facing the direction of the local transmitter? Our current aerial is in the attic and there is roughly a stone gable end between it and the local transmitter, and possibly a few hills too. Are the transmitters directional?

    Is it possible that someone has created a radio noise source at ~498 MHz and they could be found and made to stop?

    Sorry for all the further questions but it's maddening that all Saorview channels worked great, and now half of them became rubbish all at once a few weeks ago.

    Thanks again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,877 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    That transmitter is only 50 watts against 200,000 watts from Mullaghanish on 21 and 24. If you have any nearby neighbours you could check if they are using outside aerials. As a general rule Saorview recommend outside aerials, but they are not always necessary. Something must have gone wrong with your set up, so it might be time to call in a TV installer.

    https://2rn.ie/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/2RN-DTT-Television-Transmission-Network-Sept-2019-Rev.1.2.pdf



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,852 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    Yes, something in your installation is at fault here if the setup have worked without fault previously. I would look at all connections and ensure they're secure.

    Can you describe the setup from aerial to TV points. What amp is being used and where is it located?

    It would be interesting to see those signal figures without the amp in place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 watou


    Thank you both for your replies. I have a large rectangular aerial in the attic hanging from two hooks on rafters, to a box in the attic that splits the signal 4 ways down to room drops. The Living Room drop has a "Labgear PSUFC" amplifier plugged into the wall going to the attic, and a coaxial cable to the LG TV. It was all working fine until a few weeks ago.

    Late on a Sunday night, UHF 24 is now getting between 23-30% signal quality, much better than earlier daylight times I've tested at around 14%, with same very high signal strength.

    Without the amp inline, all signal strength/quality is 0%/0%. I've tightened and jiggled the living room connections with no change noticed.

    Thanks for any more thoughts, and your input so far.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,852 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    The high signal strength will be there in any case with the amp, so not getting a true reading, quality reading here is the important figure.

    I assume the large rectangular aerial is similar to this wideband grid aerial, https://www.freetv.ie/wide-band-grid-uhf-aerial/ ? Not the best aerial for Mullaghanish, especially mounted in the attic with the transmitter 45km away, it would be interesting to get the figures at the aerial before the amp in the attic, I assume they would be borderline. A Group A aerial would be recommended as it's directional and covers just the frequency range for Mullaghanish and not the complete TV frequency range and probably some of the mobile frequency range too depending on its age.

    Has anything changed in the attic recently that would have affected reception, stuff moved around etc. or outside, panels on the roof etc? Walls, roofs etc. are a signal attenuator with the amp trying to make up for the losses

    Assuming all connections from aerial to TV have been checked and are secure then next thing to check is aerial correctly aligned towards the Mullaghanish transmitter and correctly polarised H like in the picture above. Another possibility could be a fault with the amplifier in the attic or a fault with the cabling, damaged/crushed/etc.

    As posted previously an external aerial would be recommended and could eliminate the need for the amp especially for Mullaghanish, at 200 kW the most powerful transmitter in the country. I use it here in NW Co Limerick at about double your distance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 watou


    The wideband grid aerial you linked is just the type that's up in the attic, probably ca. 20 years old, and for Mullaghanish is oriented almost exactly 90% incorrectly, and polarised V instead of H. I suppose it's no wonder that signal quality is 0% for both UHF 21 and 24 without the amp.

    There's a chance that recent enough changes to our Internet and security equipment might have interfered with the RTE 1 etc. signal, but thanks to your insight it's time to get out the ladder and get back up there and orient the aerial properly, as a first step. The next step would be to get a Group A aerial to narrow down the frequencies received.

    I think you've given me something practical to attack, so thank you. I will add a reply with any observations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,852 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    20 year old grid aerial would be a wideband UHF 21-69 and iirc they perform better higher up the frequency range. In the last 10 years the TV band has been reduced twice to 21-60 and now 21-48, with the lost spectrum now used for 700/800 MHz mobile broadband. Nearby mobile base stations can cause inward interference to home TV installations with amplified overlapping aerials.

    The bow-tie directors in front are the polarising elements of the aerial.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,405 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    It's worth noting that the polarisation of those grid aerials is the opposite of what you might think. The image on freetv.ie is horizontally polarised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 watou


    Ladder, torch, moving furniture, cobwebs, 5 minutes to face the aerial towards Mullaghanish and in the correct H orientation (thanks @Glaceon and @The Cush) and with the amplifier in line I now get 100%/100% on both UHF 21 and 24. Interestingly, I get 0%/0% without the amplifier, but with a more suitable/modern high gain antenna I would probably see better.

    Everything works so much better when you have a clue what you're doing. Thank you very much for all of your help; it's very much appreciated!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,852 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    When you say without the amp, have you completely bypassed the amp and the power supply at the the TV end?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 watou


    Yes, and I just tested it again to verify! The F connector screwed into the TV coaxial cable and plugged into the wall, instead of through the amplifier. Solid 0% strength and quality, per LG TV, as opposed to pure 100% strength and quality with the amp is connected and powered. I'm surprised to see nothing at all without the amp, but as long as the amp works, problem solved!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,852 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    The amplifier is located in the attic beside the aerial, right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 watou


    No; it's in the living room by the wall socket. I didn't make an effort to get power in the attic where I'd need it, and I only use the living room drop anyway. I think the proper arrangement would have been to put the amp right after the aerial and before the splitter, so all drops would benefit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,852 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    So you have the amp and power supply (Labgear PSUFC) right beside each other behind the TV?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 watou


    The coaxial cable to the back of the TV extends about 3 metres away from the television, so the power outlet and antenna wall receptacle are next to each other about that far from the TV.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,852 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    The Labgear PSUFC is a power supply for a remote amplifier, where is the amplifier located? Trying to get my head around your setup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 watou


    Oh geez, my mistake. I had forgotten that the amplifier is up in the attic in line properly. At some point the power supply for it fried and I ordered a replacement online, and I subsequently forgot about the amplifier in the attic. So my previous posts were the gibberish of a foggy memory. So sorry about that. That probably explains why there was no signal at all with the PSU removed but the amp still in line up in the attic.

    At some point I'm going to properly re-connect the pieces properly. Thank you for cajoling me into understanding what's really going on here....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,852 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    Excellent, good to know your own installation, makes it easier to troubleshoot when issues arise.



Advertisement