Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

DART = "The Ultimate White Elephant!" 1984

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,847 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    This was mainstream thinking in the anglosphere and beyond at the time. Thatcherism had decreed public transport as something for the undesirables. America had been against it for most of the 20th century. All Ireland could do back then was ape the UK or sometimes the USA. Thankfully we're slowly moving away from that and embracing more enlightened thinking but simultaneously we're also wrapping ourselves up in hyper bureaucracy. Small projects now take a decade to complete and include endless rounds of public consultation and redesign.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,381 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    but at least they were ignored, proven wrong and are still being ignored more or less.

    proven wrong with dart, proven wrong with luas and will be proven wrong with others.

    had these headbangers been listened to, not only would they have killed rail in this country but they would have killed all public transport, as dispite their pretending to want buses as a solution to everything, they in their backside wanted to put up the money to make the bus work.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    As a matter of interest has Jim Mitchell's claim that "the line will never make any money" turned out to be true?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,709 ✭✭✭blackbox


    I'd be very surprised if it covers its running costs, never mind paying back the capital investment. Probably worse for LUAS.

    Unfortunately the social benefits are very difficult to quantify.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Luas covers its operating costs. I haven't seen a figure for DART specifically as it's usually mixed in with the rest of Irish Rail's operations which require large PSO funding. It's probably not far off Luas.

    Anyway, the premise of Mitchell's claim is all wrong. It's a service, not a product. It's not supposed to make money.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,847 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    It's actually easy enough to quantify. That's why DART+ has a business case



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 233 ✭✭Heartbreak Hank


    Do many roads make money? Or street lights? Or water? never mind that last one



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,381 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    the "make money" shtick when it comes to rail is just deflection by those against a particular rail project.

    well in my experience anyway.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,153 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    You are quite right. No call for hospitals to 'make money'. It is an easy way to 'de-rail' train projects. No matter how bad the rail projects that have been proposed in the past, if they were built, we would be very happy to use them now.



Advertisement