Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Anyone come across this or similar?

  • 17-01-2022 12:25am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,960 ✭✭✭


    So,I bought a car from a garage dealer and ,when it broke down they could not fix it.

    They offered me another car as a straight swap and they wanted payment for the work they had done to unsuccessfully repair the car.


    We disagreed on the cost of the repair but agreed to go ahead with the change over from the old car to the new car


    So a new hp agreement was produced by the garage which I signed under the impression that it was to be a straight swap .


    More than a year later I checked my bank statements and realized that the "straight swap" was a trade in price for the old and a higher price for the new car.


    So the dealer got his money for the repair that was in dispute by his profit on the deal with the new car

    Now I was stupid not to read the documents before signing and am not asking for advice as to how to proceed but I wonder whether anyone in this forum has come across this kind of practice ?



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    they wanted payment for the work they had done to unsuccessfully repair the car

    was it not under warranty?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,960 ✭✭✭amandstu




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    so you reckon they hoodwinked you with the hp, are they a reputable dealer or a back alley garage?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,960 ✭✭✭amandstu


    They have a good name,but yes that is what I think.

    I suspect they thought they were not getting what they thought they should on the repair front and got bloody minded about things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,520 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Did you sign new finance papers? Did you read the papers and keep a copy?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,960 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Yes, a copy came in the post from the finance company soon after the beginning of the new period.


    I didn't scrutinise it properly as I assumed it was just a continuation of the old agreement with the new car replacing the old at the same value.


    It was only when I noticed continuing payments in my statements that I hunted it down and realised that the old car had been traded in ,the new car had been assigned a value ,with the difference being the value of the new loan



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,520 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    I’m confused, let’s use some made up numbers,


    you bought the original car for say €20k

    you signed up for a 20k hire purchase, which lets say will end up costing €25k with interest

    you then signed up for a new hire purchase for €25k with €20k of a trade in value, but financing 25k this time instead of €20k


    that sort of thing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,960 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Going with your numbers the new hire purchase agreement would have the original car given a value of,say ,10K and the replacement car an assigned value of 15K.


    So the new hire purchase agreement would have had me borrowing 5K (plus interest) instead of the straight swap I fondly imagined.


    Make sense now?



Advertisement