Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Scanning

  • 03-08-2021 2:17pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 246 ✭✭


    afternoon ... i am looking to get about 2k photos scanned and put on a memory key .. these photos are different sizes / quality

    has anyone got this done before and can recommend anywhere in Dublin to get it done

    thanks in advance



Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,241 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    when you say photos, do you mean prints or negatives/slides?

    if prints, i suspect it may be cheaper to just buy a scanner yourself and buckle down to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 246 ✭✭magic roundabou


    they are prints .... many many years of photos



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,652 ✭✭✭thebiglad


    You could take photos of the photos with your phone. Get the lighting and angle right - probably even quicker than scanning, I did this with family albums when my parents passed away a few years ago - took a while but, I now have all the photos archived, I have even had some printed and they came out fine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,723 ✭✭✭Adrian.Sadlier


    Another, similar way of doing it, is to use a DSLR or mirrorless camera, if you have one. Set it up on a tripod, with the photos on a flat, neutral background, and if possible, rig up some way of keeping the photos straight and flat (old photos tend to curl). The easiest way is to put a clear sheet of glass over it, maybe using a polariser on the lens to reduce/eliminate reflections on the glass. I know glass is problematic but it would be the best way if the prints were all different sizes. If they were all of a few standard sizes then you could use a series of heavy mounting card frames.

    This would give you high resolution, RAW format, images. Best to do it in good, indirect natural light (if that is possible) as this will reduce reflections on the image (especially if they are gloss prints) and give an accurate white balance. Personally, I would set focus and all the other settings on the camera to manual.

    Then I would have the ability to work it like a production line. Far faster (and cheaper) than scanning. I know, as I have burnt out at least 2 scanners over the years archiving old prints that I had lost the negatives for - probably a good deal more than 2K images. If you don't have a good DSLR, you could always borrow or rent one.

    With this method, you could get it down to seconds per image - maybe 3 or 4 a minute (that's 180 - 240 per hour). Including transferring the images from camera to computer, you could easily do it in a couple of days. It took me about 2 years using the scanners (lapsed time)

    Just a thought!



Advertisement