Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Surge protection

Options
  • 11-02-2021 7:30pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 6


    I'm looking to install some 3 phase type 2 spd units to sub panels, I know the wiring regulations have recently changed and am unsure.
    Is the 0.5m rule still relevant?
    Can I connect to the load side of an existing mcb?
    Can I connect directly from the load side of the main isolator?

    Thanks for the help


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 256 ✭✭Hmob


    Billi 12 wrote: »
    I'm looking to install some 3 phase type 2 spd units to sub panels, I know the wiring regulations have recently changed and am unsure.
    Is the 0.5m rule still relevant?
    Can I connect to the load side of an existing mcb?
    Can I connect directly from the load side of the main isolator?

    Thanks for the help


    I'll take a stab at it, don't have copy of ET 10101 yet

    1.. yes I believe

    2.. no ,fitted next to isolator ,wired after isolator and protective device for spd

    3. I'm guessing on this but for discrimination purposes and protection of board and spd ,I would say the spds are protected in the board they're fitted not upstream
    Data sheet will probably say?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6 Billi 12


    Hmob wrote: »
    I'll take a stab at it, don't have copy of ET 10101 yet

    1.. yes I believe

    2.. no ,after isolator and protective device for spd

    3. I'm guessing on this but for discrimination purposes and protection of board and spd ,I would say the spds are protected in the board they're fitted not upstream
    Data sheet will probably say?


    Thanks Hmob I thought that I could fit an individual mcb or use an existing one to feed the spd.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 256 ✭✭Hmob


    Billi 12 wrote: »
    Thanks Hmob I thought that I could fit an individual mcb or use an existing one to feed the spd.

    Afaik protective device and spd goes next to isolator

    50cm is total length of cabling from isolator thru pd and spd to earth terminal

    No sure is the 50cm is a regulation


  • Registered Users Posts: 6 Billi 12


    Hmob wrote: »
    Afaik protective device and spd goes next to isolator

    50cm is total length of cabling from isolator thru pd and spd to earth terminal

    No sure is the 50cm is a regulation


    I think there's an allowance on cabling not to exceed 1m.
    Main isolator to feed a pd which in turn feeds the spd which runs to earth?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭Risteard81


    Some SPDs require their own protective device, whereas others will declare that they are adequately protected by the main overcurrent device. Really you'll need to look at the documentation for the specific SPD you're using.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 256 ✭✭Hmob


    Billi 12 wrote: »
    I think there's an allowance on cabling not to exceed 1m.
    Main isolator to feed a pd which in turn feeds the spd which runs to earth?

    Ya I seen that

    0.5 m recommended ,max 1m
    Not sure if there's anything in ET101

    Refreshed my memory on it there

    You must have protection at the main board always

    Type 1 is needed if u have lightning protection

    Type 2 otherwise

    Type 3 protects electrical equipment?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 256 ✭✭Hmob


    Risteard81 wrote: »
    Some SPDs require their own protective device, whereas others will declare that they are adequately protected by the main overcurrent device. Really you'll need to look at the documentation for the specific SPD you're using.

    If there is a protective device for the board

    A lot of sub boards only have an isolator, I was assuming no main protection in board

    Agree on checking documentation


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭Risteard81


    Hmob wrote: »
    A lot of sub boards only have an isolator
    There will still be an upstream protective device (or certainly should be).


  • Registered Users Posts: 6 Billi 12


    Risteard81 wrote: »
    Some SPDs require their own protective device, whereas others will declare that they are adequately protected by the main overcurrent device. Really you'll need to look at the documentation for the specific SPD you're using.

    No mention of a separate protective device needed, just says "must be installed on the load side of the main overcurrent protection"


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭Risteard81


    Billi 12 wrote: »
    No mention of a separate protective device needed, just says "must be installed on the load side of the main overcurrent protection"
    So then the main overcurrent device must be sufficient for it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6 Billi 12


    Hmob wrote: »
    If there is a protective device for the board

    A lot of sub boards only have an isolator, I was assuming no main protection in board

    Agree on checking documentation

    Just a 100a main isolator feeding the board


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 256 ✭✭Hmob


    Risteard81 wrote: »
    There will still be an upstream protective device (or certainly should be).

    Sorry yes there will obviously upstream

    I was trying to get the terminology right for the isolator/protective dervices at the sub board( I still can't remember)

    Im used to devices called main devices being at the main board


  • Registered Users Posts: 6 Billi 12


    Risteard81 wrote: »
    So then the main overcurrent device must be sufficient for it.

    Appreciate your help


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 256 ✭✭Hmob


    Billi 12 wrote: »
    Just a 100a main isolator feeding the board

    I get the point about the protective device for the sub board protecting the spd, I figured that would be the case for some

    Not fully convinced on spd protection being upstream of the sub board, could be wrong though


Advertisement