Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Most economical motorway driving on a 4k budget

  • 14-09-2020 6:38am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38


    I'll be doing predominantly motorway driving and am looking to get an economical car sorted on a max budget of 4k. Diesel surely the way to go but would be great to get your recommendation of car types to consider. Thank you.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,309 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    Altbiz wrote: »
    I'll be doing predominantly motorway driving and am looking to get an economical car sorted on a max budget of 4k. Diesel surely the way to go but would be great to get your recommendation of car types to consider. Thank you.
    Mini One 1.4D, Toyota Auris 1.4D, Peugeot 308 1.6D, Ford Focus 1.6D, Renault Megane or Nissan Qashqai / Tiida 1.5D.
    All would be sensible choices.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,544 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    I don’t think the Auris 1.4 are that economical at motorway speeds.

    Something with a 6 speed gearbox is a good start, plus cruise control and comfy seats.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,309 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    I don’t think the Auris 1.4 are that economical at motorway speeds.

    Something with a 6 speed gearbox is a good start, plus cruise control and comfy seats.
    The Auris has a six speed gearbox. It would probably be the pick of the bunch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,936 ✭✭✭SmartinMartin


    Something like this would be good. At your budget I wouldn't worry too much about the year, but the lower the mileage you can get, the better.

    https://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/2011-nissan-tiida-1-5-dci-5dr-nct-07-2021-66k/25945202


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭coolbeans


    Something like this would be good. At your budget I wouldn't worry too much about the year, but the lower the mileage you can get, the better.

    https://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/2011-nissan-tiida-1-5-dci-5dr-nct-07-2021-66k/25945202

    Hateful cars. Op can surely do better.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,634 ✭✭✭Aint Eazy Being Cheezy


    Something like this would be good. At your budget I wouldn't worry too much about the year, but the lower the mileage you can get, the better.

    https://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/2011-nissan-tiida-1-5-dci-5dr-nct-07-2021-66k/25945202

    It’s worth half that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,936 ✭✭✭SmartinMartin


    They didn't ask for a car to fall in love with, they asked for economy. With that they also get reliability.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,479 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    A Renault Fluence should be well within your budget.

    For example:
    https://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/2011-renault-fluence-1-5-dci-nct-6-21/25945256


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,541 ✭✭✭Leonard Hofstadter


    chicorytip wrote: »
    The Auris has a six speed gearbox. It would probably be the pick of the bunch.

    Only after around 2010 I think. The earlier cars certainly did not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 Altbiz


    Thanks v much for all the replies. I never would have thought a Qashqai would be an economical option, always assumed SUVs were the opposite. Are there other SUVs that I should be considering as very reliable/economical options?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,544 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Altbiz wrote: »
    Thanks v much for all the replies. I never would have thought a Qashqai would be an economical option, always assumed SUVs were the opposite. Are there other SUVs that I should be considering as very reliable/economical options?

    A Qashqai won’t be as economical as the likes of a Megane which shares the same drivetrain but is more aerodynamic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,544 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Keep an eye out for a Kia Cee’d Ecodynamics

    They’re a 1.6 89bhp diesel with 6 speed and lower suspension and stop/start (not a real advantage on the motorway!) and high gearing make it quite efficient for open road driving.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 Altbiz


    Would it be correct to say that a Qashqai or similar would be safer than a saloon? Just assuming that's the case because bigger and higher. As well as the motorway I'll be driving small country roads with a child so safety is actually pretty important, would definitely sacrifice economy for a safer option.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,479 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    All the Qashqai is is a tall hatchback with beefed up bumpers to give the SUV look and feel. On your budget you will be looking at a first generation Qashqai which was launched back in 2007 so it would have been as safe as most similar type new cars of that era. It won't be any safer because it's a crossover though. Something from the next segment up like an Avensis or Mondeo may have more safety features but in the case of the Avensis your probably looking at a late Mk2 which came out in 2003.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 Altbiz


    bazz26 wrote: »
    All the Qashqai is is a tall hatchback with beefed up bumpers to give the SUV look and feel. On your budget you will be looking at a first generation Qashqai which was launched back in 2007 so it would have been as safe as most similar type new cars of that era. It won't be any safer because it's a crossover though. Something from the next segment up like an Avensis or Mondeo may have more safety features but in the case of the Avensis your probably looking at a late Mk2 which came out in 2003.

    I'd have thought the higher profile would give better protection in the case of a collision which is what I'd be most concerned about out based on some of the driving I've seen on those roads.

    I can see on DoneDeal there's a big price jump between 2010 Qashqais and the 2011 ones anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,479 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    Higher profile means higher centre of gravity so easier to overturn than a conventional 3 box saloon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 Altbiz


    Quite like the look of this, any thoughts?

    edit: gone already


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 808 ✭✭✭FrankC21


    bazz26 wrote: »
    A Renault Fluence should be well within your budget.

    For example:
    https://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/2011-renault-fluence-1-5-dci-nct-6-21/25945256

    Agree with you bazz i owned a fluence, I commute from drogheda to dun laoghaire - m1 & m50 - full tank will get me 5 days.

    And you get more for what you pay for

    Qashqai, big heavy and expensive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 Altbiz


    FrankC21 wrote: »
    Agree with you bazz i owned a fluence, I commute from drogheda to dun laoghaire - m1 & m50 - full tank will get me 5 days.

    And you get more for what you pay for

    Qashqai, big heavy and expensive.

    Thanks. What type of Fluence did you have? Is the 110bhp one the one to go for?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 808 ✭✭✭FrankC21


    Altbiz wrote: »
    Thanks. What type of Fluence did you have? Is the 110bhp one the one to go for?

    I got the 110bhp, it is not too bad once you get to 6th gear it flows, the fluence isn't that great with acceleration, it is slow at start therefore, 90bhp wouldn't suit in my opinion.

    It is not the most silent engine but cabin noise isn't bad I can still hear my wife talking when were out driving on the motorway.

    Overall, from my experience driving it, you get more for what you pay for. Cheap and economical.

    I choose the 110bhp need more power for overtaking slow cars like audi's and bmw's hehehe.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,544 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    FrankC21 wrote: »
    Agree with you bazz i owned a fluence, I commute from drogheda to dun laoghaire - m1 & m50 - full tank will get me 5 days.

    And you get more for what you pay for

    Qashqai, big heavy and expensive.

    Just to point out, the Qashqai and Fluence weigh exactly the same.

    The fluence is a foot longer than the Qashqai and 4” wider.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 Altbiz


    bazz26 wrote: »
    Higher profile means higher centre of gravity so easier to overturn than a conventional 3 box saloon.

    It'd be head on collisions I'd be most worried about tbh, given some of the driving I've witnessed and a few close calls on small roads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 Altbiz


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    Just to point out, the Qashqai and Fluence weigh exactly the same.

    The fluence is a foot longer than the Qashqai and 4” wider.

    Wouldn't have guessed the Qashqai would be narrower, interesting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,479 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    Altbiz wrote: »
    It'd be head on collisions I'd be most worried about tbh, given some of the driving I've witnessed and a few close calls on small roads.

    I don't get your logic. It's not like the Qashqai is some sort of tank because it sits taller than a standard saloon. It's just hatchback with a higher driving position and beefed up bumpers to make it look like a SUV. That doesn't make is safer in a collision compared to similar conventional cars.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 Altbiz


    bazz26 wrote: »
    I don't get your logic. It's not like the Qashqai is some sort of tank because it sits taller than a standard saloon. It's just hatchback with a higher driving position and beefed up bumpers to make it look like a SUV. That doesn't make is safer in a collision compared to similar conventional cars.

    Don't get me wrong I'm no car safety expert, I just assumed a higher driving position etc would be more favourable in a head on collision than a lower based car.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,920 ✭✭✭wassie


    The dynamics of what type of car would be safer in a crash is highly variable. In certain situations, an SUV will perform better, in others a saloon, which makes generalising difficult.

    The problem with crash test programs is that these can include only a very small range of tests compared to those occurring in the real world on many different roads and speeds. You can find one lot of research to support one argument or the other.

    What is not is doubt is the newer the vehicle, the safer it is. Even within the same model, there are mid-cycle updates which often will include new safety features. Think airbags, ABS, stability control, seatbelt pre-tensioners. And this can be the difference of only a couple of years.

    If you havent't seen this before, watch this video of a 1998 Toyota Corolla vs 2015 Toyota Corolla (Auris) Crash Test undertaken as a joint safety programme between the Australasian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP).

    It certainly changed my perspective on buying a 'banger' as my kids first car.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,544 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Anything from the last 20 years should have all the safety features you mentioned.

    They’ve kinda jumped the shark in terms of safety a few years ago, and the focus now is on nannying devices to stop you getting in accidents and eventually become more reliant on it so you can check your phone more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,842 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    Anything from the last 20 years should have all the safety features you mentioned.

    They’ve kinda jumped the shark in terms of safety a few years ago, and the focus now is on nannying devices to stop you getting in accidents and eventually become more reliant on it so you can check your phone more.

    which is the least safe thing you can do in the car


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,920 ✭✭✭wassie


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    Anything from the last 20 years should have all the safety features you mentioned.

    They’ve kinda jumped the shark in terms of safety a few years ago, and the focus now is on nannying devices to stop you getting in accidents and eventually become more reliant on it so you can check your phone more.

    Not necessarily, there are plenty of vehicles over 10 years old that dont have all these features, especially towards the budget end of the market. Also actual the ways cars are designed & engineered has progressively changed dramatically more so in this period.

    I agree with your sentiments though. A lot of the new advanced safety systems definitely now compensate for driving ability.....or lack there of.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,544 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    wassie wrote: »
    Not necessarily, there are plenty of vehicles over 10 years old that dont have all these features, especially towards the budget end of the market. Also actual the ways cars are designed & engineered has progressively changed dramatically more so in this period.

    I agree with your sentiments though. A lot of the new advanced safety systems definitely now compensate for driving ability.....or lack there of.

    Rereading that, I genuinely meant 10 years and not 20!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 808 ✭✭✭FrankC21


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    Just to point out, the Qashqai and Fluence weigh exactly the same.

    The fluence is a foot longer than the Qashqai and 4” wider.

    WEIGHT

    Unladen Weight
    ****************
    Fluence - 1285 kg
    Qashqai - 1382 kg

    Gross Weight
    *******************
    Fluence - 1785 kg
    Qashai - 1930 kg

    Reference: https://www.autoevolution.com/carcompare.php?id1=17602&id2=11310


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,297 ✭✭✭✭Nekarsulm


    How about one of these?
    Steady on the road, a few creature comforts, and if you remember to put it into 6th gear , should top 50 mpg on motorway running.

    https://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/2010-t0yota-avensis-tz-2lt-d4d-new-nct-3450/26114456?campaign=14


Advertisement