Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Beef Price - Possible Solution

  • 07-07-2020 10:14am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2


    I'm new to posting on boards but I'm just thinking if this this is a possible solution to beef prices. We are currently being taken advantage of by the factories who have complete control of the price and there is very little transparency on how the factories get their prices. Prices have remained low for a number of years while factories have made huge profits. The factories know that farmers currently don't have a set plan. Some farmers what a set baseline and have other requirements and the factories use this to their advantage by claiming brexit or other issue but very little transparency on price. So what is my solution.

    My solution would be to create a completely independent financial regulatory body who would set the price range to factories each week. The independent financial regulatory would pick 10 countries. These would have similar regulations and standards (Mostly EU countries).  They would get a average price each week. The top 2 and the bottom 2 countries each week would be disregarded and the average for the week would be got from the middle 6. The factories would then have to give either maximum 5% above or below this cost and all prices would be completely transparent.

    So how would it be paid for it? We the farmer would pay for it on a small percentage levy of cattle sales both in the mart and in the factory. It would probably cost around 2 million to setup and run annually. It would be completely independent and transparent system.

    I don't mind receiving a low price if that is the current market conditions but it just feels we are getting taken advantage of. This would give clear picture on price and would be fair for both farmer and factory as it looks at average baseline price for a number of countries. Currently the factories have all the power. I know there maybe issues that I haven't thought of or people might know of ways to improve my solution and I would like to hear them. I just think if most farmers pull in the same direction, the factories can't take advantage of us. What do others think and have people other solutions.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,814 ✭✭✭kk.man


    I'm new to posting on boards but I'm just thinking if this this is a possible solution to beef prices. We are currently being taken advantage of by the factories who have complete control of the price and there is very little transparency on how the factories get their prices. Prices have remained low for a number of years while factories have made huge profits. The factories know that farmers currently don't have a set plan. Some farmers what a set baseline and have other requirements and the factories use this to their advantage by claiming brexit or other issue but very little transparency on price. So what is my solution.

    My solution would be to create a completely independent financial regulatory body who would set the price range to factories each week. The independent financial regulatory would pick 10 countries. These would have similar regulations and standards (Mostly EU countries).  They would get a average price each week. The top 2 and the bottom 2 countries each week would be disregarded and the average for the week would be got from the middle 6. The factories would then have to give either maximum 5% above or below this cost and all prices would be completely transparent.

    So how would it be paid for it? We the farmer would pay for it on a small percentage levy of cattle sales both in the mart and in the factory. It would probably cost around 2 million to setup and run annually. It would be completely independent and transparent system.

    I don't mind receiving a low price if that is the current market conditions but it just feels we are getting taken advantage of. This would give clear picture on price and would be fair for both farmer and factory as it looks at average baseline price for a number of countries. Currently the factories have all the power. I know there maybe issues that I haven't thought of or people might know of ways to improve my solution and I would like to hear them. I just think if most farmers pull in the same direction, the factories can't take advantage of us. What do others think and have people other solutions.

    That's called price regulation and the EU is a free market.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2 Controlledfury


    kk.man wrote: »
    That's called price regulation and the EU is a free market.

    Well then remove the price setting element. They can show what the average prices of Beef in EU countries and compare.

    This would show the variances in price of Irish beef compare to for example French beef. It would put pressure on the factories to be transparent on who they set their price and too explain the difference.

    The EU could then step in if the differences cannot be explained. The factories need to be accountable and there is no body currently doing this job.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,334 ✭✭✭✭wrangler




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,125 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    Exporting 90% of our Beef is killing us, and always has. We are totally dependent on international markets for a scarcity somewhere to lift prices here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,814 ✭✭✭kk.man


    Well then remove the price setting element. They can show what the average prices of Beef in EU countries and compare.

    This would show the variances in price of Irish beef compare to for example French beef. It would put pressure on the factories to be transparent on who they set their price and too explain the difference.

    The EU could then step in if the differences cannot be explained. The factories need to be accountable and there is no body currently doing this job.

    I wouldn't like the Irish price benchmarked against the European price as their production methods are different and they are usually behind the Irish price. It's the UK that a benchmark should be but they are getting out of the EU.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,742 ✭✭✭lalababa


    Beef price in Ireland is falling for the last 30+ years. There is only one set of buyers. They say jump...we say how high? They say duck.... and we say how low? What can we do INSIDE the farm gate??
    Afaik sucklers are losing money- suckler farmers should get rid of.
    Finishers are losing money- they should cut down to their MSL.
    Everybody should cut down to their MSL and use dairy bred. Cut all inputs and go organic.
    There is no point in producing 100 animals conventionally at a loss when you could produce <\=50 organically at a modest profit.
    The farm advisory groups should push this type of idea. Imagine the weekly kill goes from 35k to 15k in the space of 6 months? Surely there would be some upward pressure on prices.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,225 ✭✭✭charolais0153


    Jjameson wrote: »
    It’s only the uk producing steer and heifer grass based beef too. There’s little to compare with in Europe. The price index used by the ifj and bord bia taking young bull price as a direct comparison is ridiculous.

    Bit like the cull cows abroad too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,194 ✭✭✭alps


    lalababa wrote: »
    There is no point in producing 100 animals conventionally at a loss when you could produce <\=50 organically at a modest profit.

    This is too obvious a statement to put on any farming forum.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    lalababa wrote: »
    Beef price in Ireland is falling for the last 30+ years. There is only one set of buyers. They say jump...we say how high? They say duck.... and we say how low? What can we do INSIDE the farm gate??
    Afaik sucklers are losing money- suckler farmers should get rid of.
    Finishers are losing money- they should cut down to their MSL.
    Everybody should cut down to their MSL and use dairy bred. Cut all inputs and go organic.
    There is no point in producing 100 animals conventionally at a loss when you could produce <\=50 organically at a modest profit.
    The farm advisory groups should push this type of idea. Imagine the weekly kill goes from 35k to 15k in the space of 6 months? Surely there would be some upward pressure on prices.

    Its been said so many times, "a sheep/cows/bullocks/heifers biggest enemy is another animal of its kind grazing in the same field or in same shed"

    Draw the money and reduce variable cost / labour inputs

    Current reared calf prices seem zaney to me. How are cattle so expensive for farmers to buy when there is such a glut of calves coming on stream from the dairy expansion?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,719 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    Ireland is overproducing beef, simple as.


    Most beef farmers are busy fools, if they showed their accounts to any sane business man I think they would die laughing.

    Cut supply. It will either raise prices or at a very minimum not give below cost cattle to processors to get rich on.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,719 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    Maybe a national herd cull is the right move. If farmers can’t make the sensible decisions maybe it should be made for them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,146 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks


    _Brian wrote: »
    Maybe a national herd cull is the right move. If farmers can’t make the sensible decisions maybe it should be made for them.
    Which is the suckler cow


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,719 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    Which is the suckler cow

    I’d say derogation’s days are numbered which will impact dairy.

    But beef is massively overproduced.
    Only time we see prices lift is when supplies are tight, it has always been that way yet beef numbers to factory increased to a surplus so they sit back waiting for lads to ring begging to get cattle in. That’s not exactly a strong negotiation position we’ve put the industry into.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,146 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks


    _Brian wrote: »
    I’d say derogation’s days are numbered which will impact dairy.

    But beef is massively overproduced.
    Only time we see prices lift is when supplies are tight, it has always been that way yet beef numbers to factory increased to a surplus so they sit back waiting for lads to ring begging to get cattle in. That’s not exactly a strong negotiation position we’ve put the industry into.
    Local whispers is a good few are exiting Sucklers after this year when the BDGP is over
    Supposedly there’s a farm down the road rented for big money (no stock on it) for Nitrates


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,056 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    Local whispers is a good few are exiting Sucklers after this year when the BDGP is over
    Supposedly there’s a farm down the road rented for big money (no stock on it) for Nitrates

    There's a few stories like that around here too. I also know a beef lad with a big SFP who was renting ground just to activate the entitlements. He has a handful of FR cattle on it but he's not far off buying donkeys at this stage.

    Re beef price: people seem to be paying too much for reared calves at the moment. The loss is hidden in them until the animals are sold. It'll be hard to listen to their rant then that there's no money in cattle.

    We're all optimists but there's no point in being too optimistic either.

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,125 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    Is the genomics scheme set to end. I wouldn't be surprised if it continued. Enfer went covid 19 testing for the state during the crisis. Read between the lines folks. They need a fully functioning lab like that for future testing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,146 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks


    Is the genomics scheme set to end. I wouldn't be surprised if it continued. Enfer went covid 19 testing for the state during the crisis. Read between the lines folks. They need a fully functioning lab like that for future testing.

    I think we’ll be DNA testing all calves at birth soon
    That’ll keep them busy
    There’s weatherby’s too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,146 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks


    There's a few stories like that around here too. I also know a beef lad with a big SFP who was renting ground just to activate the entitlements. He has a handful of FR cattle on it but he's not far off buying donkeys at this stage.

    Re beef price: people seem to be paying too much for reared calves at the moment. The loss is hidden in them until the animals are sold. It'll be hard to listen to their rant then that there's no money in cattle.

    We're all optimists but there's no point in being too optimistic either.
    Was watching some calf sales online in May
    I thought calves were too dear
    AA bulls 21 days making €300


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,056 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    Was watching some calf sales online in May
    I thought calves were too dear
    AA bulls 21 days making €300

    I bought AAx heifers, a month old at the time in April, for €80, and I'm wondering now if even that was too much for them!

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 604 ✭✭✭TooOldBoots


    Was watching some calf sales online in May
    I thought calves were too dear
    AA bulls 21 days making €300


    They just make smaller loss when compared to the suckler cow system.
    Lots of people exiting the Suckler system this year,
    from chatting with the local vet there seems to be a serious drop in quality now with the dairy beef stock.
    I think the Silver haired farmers looking for the choice Charli and limousine cattle are soon going to be paying through the nose for them as the numbers plummet.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,146 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks


    They just make smaller loss when compared to the suckler cow system.
    Lots of people exiting the Suckler system this year,
    from chatting with the local vet there seems to be a serious drop in quality now with the dairy beef stock.
    I think the Silver haired farmers looking for the choice Charli and limousine cattle are soon going to be paying through the nose for them as the numbers plummet.
    I wondered that too
    Was chatting a farmer who exited due to health and is now rearing calves
    He bought calves for €10 and comments that he’d more money from the suckler cow


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,719 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    I wondered that too
    Was chatting a farmer who exited due to health and is now rearing calves
    He bought calves for €10 and comments that he’d more money from the suckler cow

    If his eye steers him to €10 suck calves, chances are the same eye steers him to rubbish sucklers and he wasn’t making a bob at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,194 ✭✭✭alps



    Re beef price: people seem to be paying too much for reared calves at the moment. .

    It's just stunning how this has been planted in the minds as the issue..Teagasc professionals giving papers on "how much you can afford to pay for the calf"

    What an absolute disservice to farmers..

    Concentrate
    Minerals
    Silage
    Fertiliser
    Reseeding
    Straw
    Hay
    Veterinary
    Medicines
    Workers
    Tags
    Testing
    Professional fees
    Accountant
    Advisor
    Insurance
    Repairs and Maintenance
    Rented land
    Labour
    Insurance
    Electricity
    Car
    Machinery
    Road tax
    Doe test
    Leases
    Contractor
    Scanning
    Etc..etc...

    But No.....the professional genii in their greatness say


    You paid too much for the calf..


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,056 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    You're right up to a point. It's easy to say the calf was too dear and just accept it as gospel that the other costs are set in stone and can't be questioned.

    It'd be more accurate to say "the cost is too high for most of the stuff you listed after you buy the calf" - that's the real issue.

    Same goes for the input costs of the farmer selling the calf.

    Having said all that, anyone buying calves should be aware of the likely returns given all those other costs.

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,146 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks


    _Brian wrote: »
    If his eye steers him to €10 suck calves, chances are the same eye steers him to rubbish sucklers and he wasn’t making a bob at all.
    Actually No
    He use to get the €1000+ for weanlings and the calves were all BF bulls that the farmer wanted gone as soon as they hit the age (no space)
    His point is more time with calves, straw, milk replacer and more management needed and they’re the first to get a price cut


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,742 ✭✭✭lalababa


    RE the strategy of elimination of the suckler cow and de-stocking to 50% or less whilst bringing inputs and new investment towards zero, thus giving the opportunity to get a profit.
    Might this strategy scare some farmers who have an inkling there will be a new 'base year' for stocking levels and recalculated farm payment amounts?


Advertisement