Clusters of Social Housing in New Developments

Colonel Claptrap

Interesting article in today's business post

https://www.businesspost.ie/residential/social-homes-separated-from-private-housing-in-new-apartment-developments-d77090a5

Killian Woods examines the architectural drawings of several upcoming developments and finds that part V social housing will be mostly grouped together, either on a single street, or a segregated block, distinctly separate from the private housing.

Some local authorities and approved housing bodies have requested that homes be clustered to cut back on maintenance costs.

Lorcan Sirr, housing lecturer at TU Dublin, said mixing social housing units with other units – so-called pepper potting – could lead to better social integration.

Rebecca Moynihan, a Labour Party senator based in Dublin South Central, said: “We’ve been constantly told in the city council that ‘pepper potting’ is the best practice. You don’t want to be able to identify social housing tenants as opposed to private tenants.”

What do you think? In my own estate part V housing is segregated to a street on it's own. This minimizes the number of private owners who live next door to a social house. Pepper potting would scatter the social housing throughout the estate with a lot of private owners living next door to social housing. Pros and cons to both.

Is segregation insidious or harmless?
Would people prefer clusters or pepper potting in their estate/apartment block?

awec

I think it depends on the number of them, but I don’t think it’s insidious, I think the point was to avoid entirely social developments as this is where problems occur. Grouping social houses together within private developments isn’t really an issue.

In my own development the social houses are beside each other, and then back on to each other. They’re surrounded by private houses on all sides.

Idbatterim

They should definitely be housed in same street or building etc. The near free rent , excellent locations now arent enough ? Absolutely out of the question, that anyone being robbed on a mortgage or rent. Should have to live with w high chance of their life being made a misery by tie rags living next door paying nothing. Obviously far worse if it's an apartment

Idbatterim

Idbatterim wrote: »

Should have to live with w high chance of their life being made a misery by tie rags living next door paying nothing

typical prejudiced view of Irish people.

anewme

I think a lot depends on the numbers. I think we have only six social (not sure if they were sold as affordable) and they were scattered through the estate. Now, 12 years later, no one could tell you which houses they were.

jrosen

I think we need to look back on developments that have had time to settle and see what has worked and follow/make changes accordingly.

Ive lived in 2 places. One the social was scattered. The other all on one road. I cant say either was better that the other because both seemed to work really well. However the social housing was less than 6 units in both as the developments were small. I would be of the opinion the the quantity is more important than the split of the actual houses.

I think the problems stem from poor management. People who buy generally dont want to live next to social housing because of what they have experienced or because they assume with social housing comes social issues.

Idbatterim

bubblypop wrote: »

typical prejudiced view of Irish people.

I've first hand experience of it , do you?

Colonel Claptrap

jrosen wrote: »

I would be of the opinion the the quantity is more important than the split of the actual houses.

The 10% part V requirement is an arbitrary number.

Does it make economic sense for councils to buy up 10% of houses with a €500k price tag in an affluent area? Or would that money be better spent buying 30% of houses in a more modest development?

70:30 private/social mix is certainly not a ghetto.

StupidLikeAFox

If there is distinct segregation it potentially leads to an us Vs them mentality. They would automatically be referred to as "the social houses" and all the associated stigma that goes with it. Pepper potting leads to greater integration and is the best practice all round - there is some research out there by Cluid I think about this

TheSheriff

My brother bought a new build and ended up with a social house next door - it absolutely ruined his life for over a year and a half. He eventually sold up after much stress, affecting his kids, his job, his marriage.

We viewed several new developments around Dublin and our first question as first time buyers was 'where are the social housing allocation going relative to available private properties".

Whilst it's admittedly quite selfish/narrow minded on our part, we had saved for a long time to afford a house in Dublin, there was no way we would be comfortable living next door to someone who got the same house for free. It would have undoubtedly made us bitter over time.

Idbatterim

Idbatterim wrote: »

I've first hand experience of it , do you?

Of neighbours? Yes of course I have.

jrosen

TheSheriff wrote: »

My brother bought a new build and ended up with a social house next door - it absolutely ruined his life for over a year and a half. He eventually sold up after much stress, affecting his kids, his job, his marriage.

We viewed several new developments around Dublin and our first question as first time buyers was 'where are the social housing allocation going relative to available private properties".

Whilst it's admittedly quite selfish/narrow minded on our part, we had saved for a long time to afford a house in Dublin, there was no way we would be comfortable living next door to someone who got the same house for free. It would have undoubtedly made us bitter over time.

I would imagine your not alone.

Elessar

TheSheriff wrote: »

My brother bought a new build and ended up with a social house next door - it absolutely ruined his life for over a year and a half. He eventually sold up after much stress, affecting his kids, his job, his marriage.

We viewed several new developments around Dublin and our first question as first time buyers was 'where are the social housing allocation going relative to available private properties".

Whilst it's admittedly quite selfish/narrow minded on our part, we had saved for a long time to afford a house in Dublin, there was no way we would be comfortable living next door to someone who got the same house for free. It would have undoubtedly made us bitter over time.

You're absolutely right to want to know. But unfortunately it is becoming harder as at least one new development in north Dublin will 'pepper pot' social housing around the estate but the developer will not disclose where they are to private buyers. I guess it's an agreement with the local council.

Elessar

Colonel Claptrap wrote: »

Interesting article in today's business post

https://www.businesspost.ie/residential/social-homes-separated-from-private-housing-in-new-apartment-developments-d77090a5

Killian Woods examines the architectural drawings of several upcoming developments and finds that part V social housing will be mostly grouped together, either on a single street, or a segregated block, distinctly separate from the private housing.

Some local authorities and approved housing bodies have requested that homes be clustered to cut back on maintenance costs.

Lorcan Sirr, housing lecturer at TU Dublin, said mixing social housing units with other units – so-called pepper potting – could lead to better social integration.

Rebecca Moynihan, a Labour Party senator based in Dublin South Central, said: “We’ve been constantly told in the city council that ‘pepper potting’ is the best practice. You don’t want to be able to identify social housing tenants as opposed to private tenants.”

What do you think? In my own estate part V housing is segregated to a street on it's own. This minimizes the number of private owners who live next door to a social house. Pepper potting would scatter the social housing throughout the estate with a lot of private owners living next door to social housing. Pros and cons to both.

Is segregation insidious or harmless?
Would people prefer clusters or pepper potting in their estate/apartment block?

Segregation is the way to go at least from a maintenance perspective. The council will look after those homes and for apartments if the council needed to do work on the systems or infrastructure they might have to get permission or buy-in from other private owners if they were in the same building and that could cause headaches. Having all social apartments in one block solves all that.

salmocab

Elessar wrote: »

Segregation is the way to go at least from a maintenance perspective. The council will look after those homes and for apartments if the council needed to do work on the systems or infrastructure they might have to get permission or buy-in from other private owners if they were in the same building and that could cause headaches. Having all social apartments in one block solves all that.

Not sure having all the apartments together really solves that, the common areas are the property of then management company set up by the owners of the estate, the council wouldn’t have any real need to do work in common areas they would just need access to apartments if they need to fix things which they would have anyway.

Experience_day

Had two colleagues in 2 jobs from different walks of life have absolutely miserable experiences with it. Like absolute misery.

senordingdong

Segregation is the obvious way to go but the sensible thing would be to use another, more palatable word.

Bits_n_Bobs

senordingdong wrote: »

Segregation is the obvious way to go but the sensible thing would be to use another, more palatable word.

Apartheid?

Hubertj

I think the problem with pepper potting would be dealing with problem tenants. Councils don’t deal with them - as in kick them out if they cause trouble. This can be a big problem for other residents - social housing or private. If this was addressed I think people would have a different view.

senordingdong

Bits_n_Bobs wrote: »

Apartheid?

No more palatable.
Like...focused or concentrated allocations.

Hubertj

Hubertj wrote: »

I think the problem with pepper potting would be dealing with problem tenants. Councils don’t deal with them - as in kick them out if they cause trouble. This can be a big problem for other residents - social housing or private. If this was addressed I think people would have a different view.

Councils have an anti social section dealing with complaints about tenants. They do indeed kick people out, eventually. Of course, they still have to house them, so they are moved.
Try to get rid of problem neighbours who own their home.......

ShaShaBear

bubblypop wrote: »

Councils have an anti social section dealing with complaints about tenants. They do indeed kick people out, eventually. Of course, they still have to house them, so they are moved.
Try to get rid of problem neighbours who own their home.......

My friend (socially-housed) has been lodging near weekly complaints for the past 3 years with both the gardaí and her council (neighbour is also socially-housed) as the neighbours have poisoned her dog, threatened bodily harm on her and both her children, vandalised her home and garden, and they themselves have been raided for drug dealing and possession twice in the past month alone. All evidence has been submitted in written format, video format and voice recording format. All ignored to date. Said friend has even begged for a transfer but was refused as there were no suitable places available and she is adequately housed.

Problem council/social housing tenants are a problem for everyone. And a lot of people assume that all county councils operate like they do in Dublin (which is simply not the case).

Graham

Mod Note

ok folks, before this turns into yet another social housing bashing session.



The question is;

clusters of social housing

or

spread around a development (pepper potting)

senordingdong

I can only see peppered spread being better if they are spread very, very thin.
But as pointed out, this created more work for the body that holds responsibility for them

Caranica

I live in a large development in D15 made up of independent clusters, all cul de sacs with their own management companies. A few years ago Fingal ditched their own social housing policy and purchased an entire cluster. I'm lucky that my cluster is well away from there as the neighbouring clusters have had lots of issues. Because of that all the residents are being tarred with the same brush. There's maybe 100 homes there. A few bad eggs are ruining it for everyone

surrender monkey

ShaShaBear wrote: »

My friend (socially-housed) has been lodging near weekly complaints for the past 3 years with both the gardaí and her council (neighbour is also socially-housed) as the neighbours have poisoned her dog, threatened bodily harm on her and both her children, vandalised her home and garden, and they themselves have been raided for drug dealing and possession twice in the past month alone. All evidence has been submitted in written format, video format and voice recording format. All ignored to date. Said friend has even begged for a transfer but was refused as there were no suitable places available and she is adequately housed.

Problem council/social housing tenants are a problem for everyone. And a lot of people assume that all county councils operate like they do in Dublin (which is simply not the case).

Tell your friend to engage a solicitor to write to the Council on her behalf that will make them pay attention to her.

RedXIV

We've started looking at houses in new developments, is there a way to discover this sort of information? I've no qualms about living next to someone who can't afford a house and is given one, as long as they don't make my life miserable

Cuddlesworth

RedXIV wrote: »

We've started looking at houses in new developments, is there a way to discover this sort of information? I've no qualms about living next to someone who can't afford a house and is given one, as long as they don't make my life miserable

No, the developers won't tell you now as the value of the adjacent properties would drop significantly.

ShaShaBear

surrender monkey wrote: »

Tell your friend to engage a solicitor to write to the Council on her behalf that will make them pay attention to her.

That is the path she is currently on, hopefully it gains notice.

On the actual topic, we currently rent in a cluster of houses that were originally all social waaay back in the 1930s. Most of the residents here now own their homes, some inherited them off parents but there are still a few that are still rented via the council. On one side of us is a council house with a part-time worker in the local nursing home. Never so much as a peep, always says hello and she's kept post safe for us and we have gotten shopping for her and given the odd lift to work when the weather was bad as she doesn't have a car.
On our other side, we have a narcissistic, perverted, paranoid and obnoxious older man who owns his home. He drinks heavily, has cameras pointed every which way, will literally watch them for when we are outside with our kids and mysteriously appear and has accused us of breaking gardening equipment out of spite (never mind having never borrowed a thing off him as we were warned). He's also been known to poison a dog or two in the area if the barking/behaviour annoys him, so we have to be extra-cautious. Next to him is another social house that had a family of settled travellers who were absolutely lovely. They often sent over leftover birthday cake, asked permission to park outside our gate when they had family over and gave us a dog bed and some toys after their own dog passed away from old age. Ironically, only have trouble from the neighbour who isn't renting from the council. Because of that, I don't think segregated social housing is the way to go. I was raised in a social housing estate, as a child only maybe two houses were purchased from the council and out of the entire cluster of maybe 150 houses, there were two families to avoid. There are many families in social housing who have regular jobs, polite and well-mannered children who don't cause trouble and who volunteer locally - they just can't, for a multitude of reasons, get granted a mortgage.

Now, in saying all of that - I have noticed that the more heavily-populated the area, the more "trouble tenants" seem to pop up. But it only takes 1 menace in a group of 10 houses to make life miserable for the other 9.

Colonel Claptrap

Cuddlesworth wrote: »

No, the developers won't tell you now as the value of the adjacent properties would drop significantly.

Developer told me when I asked.

Cuddlesworth

Colonel Claptrap wrote: »

Developer told me when I asked.

From what I have heard recently, the smart ones have learned not to.

senordingdong

RedXIV wrote: »

We've started looking at houses in new developments, is there a way to discover this sort of information? I've no qualms about living next to someone who can't afford a house and is given one, as long as they don't make my life miserable

My advice is to avoid new developments altogether. In my experience they are wrought with problems such as parking and private management.

billyhead

The house next door to me was purchased by the council. Nobody has moved into it as of yet. The people who do though could be genuine, decent and hard working but on low wages. I won't be jumping to conclusions yet that social tenants are bad news.

bubblypop

bubblypop wrote: »

Councils have an anti social section dealing with complaints about tenants. They do indeed kick people out, eventually. Of course, they still have to house them, so they are moved.
Try to get rid of problem neighbours who own their home.......

And you can only make a complaint to that section if you are a social housing tenant yourself...

[Deleted User]

[Deleted User] wrote: »

And you can only make a complaint to that section if you are a social housing tenant yourself...

That's not true.

jrosen

senordingdong wrote: »

My advice is to avoid new developments altogether. In my experience they are wrought with problems such as parking and private management.

Not all new developments but I this is something everyone who is considering buying new should be aware of.

hoodie6029

Idbatterim wrote: »

They should definitely be housed in same street or building etc. The near free rent , excellent locations now arent enough ? Absolutely out of the question, that anyone being robbed on a mortgage or rent. Should have to live with w high chance of their life being made a misery by tie rags living next door paying nothing. Obviously far worse if it's an apartment

I live in an all private estate and my next door neighbour is a nightmare. Inconsiderate and two faced, turned their back garden into an all weather playground. They haven't bothered to home school their children during the lockdown so the kids have just been running wild for 3 months now. I could go on.

I'd have been no better off, more than likely better off if I'd had a social or affordable house next to me. So clusters or peppered, makes no difference.

Graham

Mod Note

Friendly reminder

Before this turns into yet another social housing bashing session.



The question is;

clusters of social housing

or

spread around a development (pepper potting)

Keep_Shining

What's your experience living next door to social housing

DownByTheGarden

I wrote a big long post about how council houses in an estate you are buying in can effect the value of your house when you sell it but it has disapeared. I dont have the energy to write it again, but when you go looking at a house to spend your hard earned money on, think about when you might be going to sell it and what potential buyers might think when spending their money in the future on your house.

deleted. Zombie thread.

deleted. Zombie thread.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/120196316#Comment_120196316

Quite ironic, considering on another thread you're in the process of selling an apartment to the council?

Don't you care about the value of your neighbour's properties and who might be put in living next door to them?

DownByTheGarden

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/120196970#Comment_120196970

All explained in the other thread.

Yes i dont believe in the council outbidding people for properties, but im not going ro refuse the outrageous amount they want to pay me either. Turns out they either rent or have bought half the development anyway.

RichardAnd

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/113661978#Comment_113661978

It's a perfectly valid observation. Many of us are either paying huge amounts of rent or have decades long mortgages to pay in order to provide ourselves with accommodation. However, some people have been given a house or apartment that is just the same for a song. I don't look down on anyone, but by giving someone a social house, the said house is denied to someone who could potentially buy it with their hard-earned money.

Social housing is just one more elephant in the herd that we all want to ignore in modern Ireland.

herbalplants

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/120218750#Comment_120218750

You will always have the single mother with 10 kids who will demand a house while the rest of us couldn't afford even 4 kids because we are responsible. They will be around.

Quitelife

Nobody should have a problem with social housing or HAP housing in their estate but only if those houses are for Law Abiding people!.

The problem arises when criminals/scumbags destroy the quality of life for people who paid for thie houses.

RichardAnd

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/120220018#Comment_120220018

Yup, but if that single mother were not to be given the said house, she could well reconsider her life choices....