Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Is this the worlds stupidest man ?

  • 04-01-2020 11:00pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 245 ✭✭


    Lu Chao, a 28 year old Chinese man has been ordered to pay a Chinese airline 15000 euros in compensation for lost business after he threw coins into the planes engine, supposedly to ensure good luck on the flight. He then argued in court that the airline should have warned passengers not to throw coins into the engines !!! This guy must surely be a contender for the Global Village Idiot of the year. Come back Maria Bailey, all is forgiven !!! :D


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,025 ✭✭✭KilOit


    Lu Chao, a 28 year old Chinese man has been ordered to pay a Chinese airline 15000 euros in compensation for lost business after he threw coins into the planes engine, supposedly to ensure good luck on the flight. He then argued in court that the airline should have warned passengers not to throw coins into the engines !!! This guy must surely be a contender for the Global Village Idiot of the year. Come back Maria Bailey, all is forgiven !!! :D

    Common in Asia with older people


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    Lu Chao, a 28 year old Chinese man has been ordered to pay a Chinese airline 15000 euros in compensation for lost business after he threw coins into the planes engine, supposedly to ensure good luck on the flight. He then argued in court that the airline should have warned passengers not to throw coins into the engines !!! This guy must surely be a contender for the Global Village Idiot of the year. Come back Maria Bailey, all is forgiven !!! :D

    Yes. He is literally the world's most stupid man.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 193 ✭✭MMXX


    A great bunch of lads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,501 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    KilOit wrote: »
    Common in Asia with older people

    Surely jet engines haven't been around long enough for stupid traditions like this.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 784 ✭✭✭LaFuton


    obvz a covert stock share move

    that dude is either a pyramidal genius or a pawn

    either way he's still a spoon truth denier


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Bobblehats


    MMXX wrote: »
    A great bunch of lads.

    Big fùckin place it’s gotta have it’s share.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 463 ✭✭Jonybgud


    Bobblehats wrote: »
    Big fùckin place it’s gotta have it’s share.

    Were all the windows in China licked that he needed to take a jet elsewhere to start again there?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,423 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    KilOit wrote: »
    Common in Asia with older people

    To throw older people into jet engines ?

    Bit messy ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,551 ✭✭✭SeaFields


    He probably would have won that argument in front of some of our judges


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 82 ✭✭misterme123


    Padre_Pio wrote: »
    Surely jet engines haven't been around long enough for stupid traditions like this.


    It's an ancient Chinese custom but nobody could put it into practice until the invention of jet engines.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Is this the worlds stupidest man ?

    By what measure?

    Is it any more or less ridiculous than 100s of our local citizens walking up the aisle in local club houses and eating a piece of bread and thinking it brings them somehow closer in commune with the maker of the universe?

    For me the only obvious difference is that 1 person believed it compared to millions of people believing it.

    But the numbers make neither any less ridiculous :)

    TLDR I do not think he is stupid. I think he is human. And humans get some _weird_ ideas in their heads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,485 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    That’s about as stupid as people clapping when the plane lands.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,527 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    By what measure?

    Is it any more or less ridiculous than 100s of our local citizens walking up the aisle in local club houses and eating a piece of bread and thinking it brings them somehow closer in commune with the maker of the universe?

    For me the only obvious difference is that 1 person believed it compared to millions of people believing it.

    But the numbers make neither any less ridiculous :)

    TLDR I do not think he is stupid. I think he is human. And humans get some _weird_ ideas in their heads.

    edge


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    y


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,527 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    y

    because you can


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 693 ✭✭✭The Satanist


    So happy to have opened this thread and not seen a picture of me


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,527 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    So happy to have opened this thread and not seen a picture of me

    http://facebook.com/profile.php?=73322363


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,636 ✭✭✭feargale


    By what measure?

    Is it any more or less ridiculous than 100s of our local citizens walking up the aisle in local club houses and eating a piece of bread and thinking it brings them somehow closer in commune with the maker of the universe?

    For me the only obvious difference is that 1 person believed it compared to millions of people believing it.

    But the numbers make neither any less ridiculous :)

    TLDR I do not think he is stupid. I think he is human. And humans get some _weird_ ideas in their heads.

    There is another difference. The action of the man in China could have caused harm to others, as in death to many passengers or even a million people if the plane came down in, say, Beijing. The people walking down the aisle are not harming others, except perhaps those people who don't share their beliefs and want to mind their business for them, those suffering people who have to live on this godawful planet with people whose beliefs they do not share. What a nightmare. Those people with religious belief should be castigated on every thread in boards.ie, including threads on the weather, on tiddlywinks, on organic farming etc etc. They are responsible for everything that's wrong with the world and we shouldn't be discussing anything else, especially if we know nothing about anything else. :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 834 ✭✭✭KWAG2019


    Hard to judge. There’s a lot of competition out there. Currently running a close second is POTUS who has tweeted that he intends to bomb sites important to Iranian culture if they retaliate. He seems careless that doing what he has tweeted is a war crime. Pretty stupid.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    feargale wrote: »
    The action of the man

    This I grant you. The manifestation of his belief was different.

    My comment was more about whether his belief was - of itself - any more or less ridiculous than others. Do not forget the title of the thread. The thread was about how stupid the man was. Not about the effects his stupidity may or may not have had. And my one and _only_ point was that in isolation his belief was not any more or less stupid than any other.
    feargale wrote: »
    Those people with religious belief should be castigated on every thread in boards.ie

    If you say so :)But please note you are the first and only person so far on the thread to say so :) No one else did. Much as your intention seems to have been to not so subtly imply otherwise :)

    No the purpose of my post at least - seeing as it is the only one I can speak for or to - was not to castigate anyone specifically. But to alleviate castigation on this one individual by pointing out that his superstition was no more or less "stupid" than anyone else's. It just _seems_ stupider because it harmed more people.

    But if you normalize for harm - he is no more or less stupid than these people here for example.

    TLDR: You are talking about the effect of his stupid belief - while I was talking about the relative differences in stupidity between beliefs.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,230 ✭✭✭jaxxx


    Lu Chao, a 28 year old Chinese man has been ordered to pay a Chinese airline 15000 euros in compensation for lost business after he threw coins into the planes engine, supposedly to ensure good luck on the flight. He then argued in court that the airline should have warned passengers not to throw coins into the engines !!! This guy must surely be a contender for the Global Village Idiot of the year. Come back Maria Bailey, all is forgiven !!! :D


    Pretty sure the petrol stations don't warn you not to drink petrol as well.This fella though.. .. ..


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    jaxxx wrote: »
    Pretty sure the petrol stations don't warn you not to drink petrol as well.This fella though.. .. ..

    +1

    Two things spring to mind when I read your post.

    The first was the court case that lead to hot drinks being labelled as "hot"

    but many years before that the genius Douglas Adams writing a sketch where after he read the "instructions" on the side of a packet of tooth picks - he built an inside mental asylum where he lived on the "outside" and everyone else lived on the "inside".

    I think Mr Adams predicted most of the 2000s in that scene :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,230 ✭✭✭jaxxx


    +1

    Two things spring to mind when I read your post.

    The first was the court case that lead to hot drinks being labelled as "hot"

    but many years before that the genius Douglas Adams writing a sketch where after he read the "instructions" on the side of a packet of tooth picks - he built an inside mental asylum where he lived on the "outside" and everyone else lived on the "inside".

    I think Mr Adams predicted most of the 2000s in that scene :)


    Wasn't there a case there only some weeks back about someone scalding themselves on a flight, sued the airline and then got paid thousands or something like that? FFS what happened to self-accountability? If I have a takeaway tea and burn myself, it's my fault not the f*cking shop I bought it from, unless the cup 'gave way' and the bottom of it just went (very unlikely I would say)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Like I said - Douglas Adams seemed to have predicted this level of stupidity in a book that is so old it even had a radio series before I reached the age of reason :)

    There is something wrong with us. All of us. And after 4 decades on this planet the only thing I know for sure is I have neither a diagnosis nor a cure :)

    But the one thing I am quite certain of is that after "first glance" the man described in the OP is no more or less stupid than anyone else that springs instantly to mind :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,636 ✭✭✭feargale


    But if you normalize for harm - he is no more or less stupid than these people here for example

    You are conflating people walking down an aisle minding their own business with parents causing the death of their child by choosing not to call a doctor. You might have had a point to make if you had cited the latter example instead of "the usual suspects" whose views I don't share incidentally.

    TLDR: You are talking about the effect of his stupid belief - while I was talking about the relative differences in stupidity between beliefs.

    How on earth can you measure the stupidity of an act in isolation from its effects?

    It took a long time for this country to arrive at a juncture where all non-subversive beliefs were entitled to equality of esteem. If boards is anything to go by we seem to be regressing. I use non-subversive in its broadest sense.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 564 ✭✭✭2ygb4cmqetsjhx


    It happens from time to time in China. People in China are very superstitious and believe in lots of things that many people in Ireland would consider unorthodox. I am not sure "stupid" is correct but it is more of an education problem.

    As someone who has spent considerable time in mainland China, I can assure you, that this is just the tip of the iceberg of the insane and idiosyncratic daily occurrences in the middle kingdom.


  • Posts: 3,637 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That’s about as stupid as people clapping when the plane lands.

    Window licking, bread munching, happy clapping gobsheites.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    feargale wrote: »
    You are conflating people walking down an aisle minding their own business with parents causing the death of their child by choosing not to call a doctor.

    Nope. You are doing that.

    Why? How?

    Because once again you are talking about the effects of their belief. And thus missing the point of my original post.

    My original post has nothing - read this again - nothing - to do with the negative effects of beliefs.

    My sole and only point was that if you ignore the effects of their belief - that the idea throwing coins might bring you luck is no more - and lets be honest less - ridiculous than the idea that eating bread will bring you into commune with the creator of the universe.

    TLDR: The problem here is not "stupidity" was my only point :)
    feargale wrote: »
    How on earth can you measure the stupidity of an act in isolation from its effects?

    I don't know. My post was about the relationship between stupidity and belief. Not stupidity and action. If you want to talk about the former I am game. If you want to talk about the latter then I am not the man for you :)
    feargale wrote: »
    It took a long time for this country to arrive at a juncture where all non-subversive beliefs were entitled to equality of esteem. If boards is anything to go by we seem to be regressing. I use non-subversive in its broadest sense.

    Here we are more on the same page. My spider sense tingles every time people appeal to equality. Too often the word is a weapon more than an ideal. It does not mean what I want it to mean any more. And my skin tingles tell me you think so too.


Advertisement