Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New EV battery technology-cobalt free

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 530 ✭✭✭VikingG


    TITLE - IBM’s new cobalt-free battery uses materials extracted from seawater

    TEXT - “The goal would be, within a year or so, to have the first working prototype (of the battery),”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,222 ✭✭✭circadian


    I've seen over the years reports of seawater and graphite type batteries to move away from using rare-earth metals. It'd be great if we could get away from using materials that need to be shipped around the world and could be produced more locally but I'd imagine that this is a long time off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,064 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    Just another headline i'm afraid. I wouldn't put any water in it until something more solid is produced.

    Stay Free



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,027 ✭✭✭Lantus


    Just another headline i'm afraid. I wouldn't put any water in it until something more solid is produced.

    It's early days but several years development is relatively short if achieved. It would eliminate the most scarce metal in those units and the horrendous mining that extracts it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,223 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    LiFePO4 batteries are cobalt free I think.

    Bit heavier though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,288 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    I thought solid state lithium batteries were the next big thing? Anyone know any more about that?
    https://www.navigantresearch.com/news-and-views/is-2020-the-year-of-solid-state-batteries-for-evs
    I suppose the problem with solid state batteries is you are still using rare earth materials in the form of lithium, albeit more efficiently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,132 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    tom1ie wrote: »
    I suppose the problem with solid state batteries is you are still using rare earth materials in the form of lithium, albeit more efficiently.

    Lithium is not a rare earth element.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭Orebro


    There's a battery breakthrough story every other day at the moment - none of them have made it out of the lab though so we're years away from anything replacing what we have at the moment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,656 ✭✭✭celtic_oz


    There's a battery breakthrough story every other day at the moment - none of them have made it out of the lab though so we're years away from anything replacing what we have at the moment.

    its just not goodenough


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    YABB = Yet Another Battery Breakthrough

    Lemme know when products are announced that use these batteries. IBM and Mercedes-Benz mentioned may or may not give this some gravity, depending on the motives. Merc would be happy to have an excuse to delay mass production of BEVs (have to wait for these) but IBM are normally reliable enough. Just a bit of a dinosaur these days.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    I often wonder how we track these battery improvements.
    We've seen battery density increase by approx 20% per year, and battery cost per kWh decrease at around 8% per year.

    Is it not the case, that we're just seeing battery research from 5 years ago hit a commercial scale?
    This research is claiming cobalt free batteries, but we've been seeing cobalt reduce over time anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,223 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    This is a decent medium-detail article from April.

    https://qz.com/1588236/how-we-get-to-the-next-big-battery-breakthrough/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,288 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    unkel wrote: »
    Lithium is not a rare earth element.

    Thanks for pointing that out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    IBM is doing this for the patents, they would never bring a product like this to market. Instead they develop something, patent it and then let all the manufacturers build the product while they take a nice cut in the back ground.

    See below
    “The goal would be, within a year or so, to have the first working prototype (of the battery),” said Jeff Welser, vice president at IBM Research. IBM may not necessarily end up making a product using the design, Welser added.

    This is the most important bit. So they have developed the technology, it is ready to be used but they want someone to buy the rights off them and build it. Hence why it will take a year.

    IBM is the top patent company in the World. Majority of those patents they never bring to market. Google etc in years gone past have paid millions if not billions to IBM to buy the patents off them.


Advertisement