Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on [email protected] for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact [email protected]

Anyone watching Claire Byrne Live ?

  • 16-12-2019 10:43pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭


    Appalling.

    Mods please leave this open for as long as you can, anyone who posts please don't speculate on the IDs of the attackers.


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,046 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Was this an unprovoked attack?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,796 ✭✭✭Demonique


    Was this an unprovoked attack?

    Even if they provoked their attackers it doesn't warrant having acid thrown at them


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,416 ✭✭✭✭Hello 2D Person Below


    I'm not watching, is it the acid attack in Waterford?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Yes, happened last Spring


    I'd love to know what the justification for not pressing charges was, given the severity of the attack.


  • Registered Users Posts: 80,369 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn


    I think if blurred photos of the attackers were shown it might help knowing why this decision was made.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,046 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Demonique wrote: »
    Even if they provoked their attackers it doesn't warrant having acid thrown at them

    Wasn’t my question.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭donkeykong5


    Was this an unprovoked attack?

    Does anyone know


  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭[Deleted User]


    I think if blurred photos of the attackers were shown it might help knowing why this decision was made.

    Why would that make any difference?


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,416 ✭✭✭✭Hello 2D Person Below


    I think if blurred photos of the attackers were shown it might help knowing why this decision was made.

    Not quite.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    bubblypop wrote: »
    Why would that make any difference?

    Maybe AD believes the attackers were also black and so are being protected by a liberal conspiracy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 188 ✭✭DLS_75


    My nephew - who is off their age - tells me that there is no innocent victim of that event. There was a story on social media going around explaining what actually happened - anyone ever see that?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,046 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    DLS_75 wrote: »
    My nephew - who is off their age - tells me that there is no innocent victim of that event. There was a story on social media going around explaining what actually happened - anyone ever see that?

    Remember something at the time that’s why I asked the first question in this thread.


  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭[Deleted User]


    DLS_75 wrote: »
    no innocent victim

    Hardly makes sense?
    Anyway. Doesn't matter if there was a row or fight, throwing acid at someone is a premeditated serious assault


  • Registered Users Posts: 188 ✭✭DLS_75


    If they all allegedly turned up to the fight and all had weapons then, ya know, there’s no innocent victim there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 80,369 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn


    Maybe AD believes the attackers were also black and so are being protected by a liberal conspiracy.

    Yes this is what social media is full of.


  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭[Deleted User]


    Yes this is what social media is full of.

    Ridiculous to believe that offenders are being protected because of their skin colour.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,416 ✭✭✭✭Hello 2D Person Below


    This has nothing to do with skin colour.

    That's all I'll say (and can legally say) on the matter.


Advertisement