Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Clones - think twins rather than town

  • 14-10-2019 11:26pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,577 ✭✭✭✭


    If an embryo is copied (as happens naturally in the case of identical twins) and both grow, the relationship between the two is of siblings.

    If one takes DNA from a born person and create a clone, genetically, they are identical twins (or close enough), but what is the relationship? There's an argument that it is of parent and child - the original's parents have not had another child.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,989 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Victor wrote: »
    If an embryo is copied (as happens naturally in the case of identical twins) and both grow, the relationship between the two is of siblings.

    If one takes DNA from a born person and create a clone, genetically, they are identical twins (or close enough), but what is the relationship? There's an argument that it is of parent and child - the original's parents have not had another child.
    Genitically, they are siblings to one another, and both share the same parents.

    Is this fundamentally different to the case of identical twins? In both cases you start out with a single individual, but after a certain time division occurs and you have two distinct individuals with identical genetic composition. The only difference is that in one case the "certain time" is relatively shortly after conception, but in the other case it is many years later.

    The social reality, of course, may be quite different from the genetic reality. As to who fills the parental role, and whether they can or should be regarded as akin to adoptive parents - that will depend on the facts, and we are going to have to develop some social and legal norms about this if and when human cloning becomes a reality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,541 ✭✭✭Claw Hammer


    These issues are arising in surrogacy cases where there is an argument that the woman who bears the child is the mother despite her having no genetic link to the child. There are knock on consequences with regard to siblings and grandparents. What if a clone turns up when a genetic parent has died and seeks a share of the estate? What about inheritace tax? Is the gift from a parent or stranger?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    Good job from a CAT aspect, Clones in in Monaghan, not Cavan.... ;)

    I imagine the state will be very slow to legislate for this and cause unnecessary hassle for the first people to need to deal with this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,769 ✭✭✭nuac


    Mod
    Thank you Caraway, but let's keep this simple rather than introducing the Ulster dimension


Advertisement