Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Budget discussion - grants

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,577 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Well get rid of PHEV grant for a start


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,362 ✭✭✭rolion


    Just don't get it...I tough the owners of EVs are a bit smart and very respectful to others. BEVs or PHEVs driving in cities and urban makes same effort towards zero pollution. Unless some are jealous of the immense range extender of the hybrid compared with limited for the electric !?

    Very peculiar faces at the public charger:
    When I park my BEV, all drivers smiles and happy to chat / exchange thoughts and opinions.
    When I park my PHEV, all behaves like I am going to steal their valuable "free of e_charge" payment electrons.

    Just don't get it, i said I will start recording on the dashcam their miserable faces... ;)
    I do hope it will shift the mood when paid charging comes in effect.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,577 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    I have nothing against PHEV but there are plenty of PHEVs driving around on our roads that never use the battery, same in the UK where they were bought to avoid congestion charges/low car tax/low BIK and the are used 100% as petrol cars, especially the Outlander.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,826 ✭✭✭phill106




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,959 ✭✭✭stesaurus


    Hopefully no more PHEV grants


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 828 ✭✭✭Round Cable


    stesaurus wrote: »
    Hopefully no more PHEV grants

    Or maybe even the €1500 hybrid grant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 712 ✭✭✭kaahooters


    slave1 wrote: »
    I have nothing against PHEV but there are plenty of PHEVs driving around on our roads that never use the battery, same in the UK where they were bought to avoid congestion charges/low car tax/low BIK and the are used 100% as petrol cars, especially the Outlander.


    they all still act as regular hybrids, and still better then a diesel for the emissions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 589 ✭✭✭MorganIRL


    Is there any mention of VRT changing??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,952 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Somethings gotta give...
    How much is collected in tax, between vrt, vat, fuel taxes Ect from the motor industry...
    So if there's going to be encouragement for electric vehicles there's gotta funds from somewhere...
    (does anyone know has there been a major change in tax income from motoring, between 2008 and now? Ie. The taxation encouraged switch to diesel)

    Incidentally i for one welcome our new electrical transport overlords...

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭daheff


    stesaurus wrote: »
    Hopefully no more PHEV grants

    Why?

    Surely get people into a car that they can start off at as an ev than stop some people altogether.

    Some people still have range/charging anxiety. Having comfort knowing they can use petrol if they need to helps get them transitioned. Once they start they are unlikely to go back


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭Mike9832


    Needed to happen

    Agree on phev grant removal

    Prices are a joke on BEV

    Kona diesel €21,000, Kona EV €48,000

    We can't keep paying autogiants R&D

    Hopefully it's a sliding scale

    100% grant for sub €30,000, 75% sub €35,000 etc

    No €100,000 Tesla, Audi, Merc etc should be getting a grant


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,267 ✭✭✭digiman


    Mike9832 wrote: »
    No €100,000 Tesla, Audi, Merc etc should be getting a grant

    Why not?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭Mike9832


    digiman wrote: »
    Why not?

    We need to get masses into electric cars


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,826 ✭✭✭phill106


    stesaurus wrote: »
    Hopefully no more PHEV grants

    Surely moving to phev is at least some advantage over a full petrol or diesel?

    Im thinking of going to a phev soon, as i like the ideas of electric cars, but for several reasons, the majority of full electric cars wouldnt suit my lifetyle..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,267 ✭✭✭digiman


    Mike9832 wrote: »
    digiman wrote: »
    Why not?

    We need to get masses into electric cars

    We need to encourage everyone to get an electric car and not penalise someone for wanting to buy a nice car


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,492 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    digiman wrote: »
    We need to encourage everyone to get an electric car and not penalise someone for wanting to buy a nice car

    if your spending 100k on a car, you don't need a grant towards it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    tom1ie wrote: »
    if your spending 100k on a car, you don't need a grant towards it.


    Exactly, the grant should be for the bacis model in each segment to assist the lower end of the market, as it will be these people who will struggle more with the switch to electric.

    It should not be for the relatively wealthy, and not for any types of impracital or inefficient cars, I. E sports cars, 2 seater, limos, luxury etc.

    In fact I would remove the grant completely, and put more prussure on the auto makers to reduce prices in line with desiles more.

    Any support money should be invested in charging points, network upgrades etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,959 ✭✭✭stesaurus


    daheff wrote: »
    Why?

    Surely get people into a car that they can start off at as an ev than stop some people altogether.

    Some people still have range/charging anxiety. Having comfort knowing they can use petrol if they need to helps get them transitioned. Once they start they are unlikely to go back

    Because as a taxpayer I don't want to be incentivizing PHEVs or HEVs. They are just a tax dodge really and I say this as a PHEV owner.
    I'm happy to encourage EV growth though and that's where these funds should be directed. EVs are ready for the masses at this point, it's mainly a supply issue now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,976 ✭✭✭kanuseeme


    Kona diesel €21,000, Kona EV €48,000

    increase the cost of buying a diesel by creating a Future Universal Carbon Kilogram Initiative Tax, this new tax should be easy and would help people switch to an EV fairly quickly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,528 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    kanuseeme wrote: »
    Kona diesel €21,000, Kona EV €48,000

    increase the cost of buying a diesel by creating a Future Universal Carbon Kilogram Initiative Tax, this new tax should be easy and would help people switch to an EV fairly quickly.

    Catchy name too, easy to remember.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,321 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    phill106 wrote: »

    Yeah I opened that thread this morning......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,976 ✭✭✭kanuseeme




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,826 ✭✭✭phill106


    listermint wrote: »
    Yeah I opened that thread this morning......

    apologies i didnt see it, and i did look first :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,362 ✭✭✭rolion


    stesaurus wrote: »
    Because as a taxpayer I don't want to be incentivizing PHEVs or HEVs. They are just a tax dodge really and I say this as a PHEV owner.
    I'm happy to encourage EV growth though and that's where these funds should be directed. EVs are ready for the masses at this point, it's mainly a supply issue now.

    Sorry for picking on you but may I ask you to develop the tax dodge, please !?

    There are no "tax dodge" on BIK, none in road tax, same price for petrol fuel, same price for charging at public charger, same charger as charging at home... where is the hidden secret advantage !??

    Just don't get the fcuking hate towards PHEVs !
    And own a BEV and a PHEV...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,005 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    tom1ie wrote: »
    if your spending 100k on a car, you don't need a grant towards it.

    You might, the buyer could buy an ICE. The more EVs on the road the more awareness and hence you’ll get a trickle down effect.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,154 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    rolion wrote: »
    Sorry for picking on you but may I ask you to develop the tax dodge, please !?

    There are no "tax dodge" on BIK, none in road tax, same price for petrol fuel, same price for charging at public charger, same charger as charging at home... where is the hidden secret advantage !??

    Just don't get the fcuking hate towards PHEVs !
    And own a BEV and a PHEV...

    Studies from the UK showed that there are basically two kinds of PHEV owner, those who charge every day and make it work, and those who barely plug it in and should have just bought a hybrid. The only reason they were buying PHEVs was for the subsidy and reduced BIK.

    When they removed the PHEV grants sales dropped to less than half whilst BEV sales continued to increase. There are enough long range EVs available new going into 2020 that it makes sense to remove the subsidies from them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,535 ✭✭✭btkm8unsl0w5r4


    tom1ie wrote: »
    if your spending 100k on a car, you don't need a grant towards it.

    While that seems logical and certainly a popular opinion. But when you can spend 100k you have a lot of options. Anything that would make you choose something greener is a good thing.

    Changing the attitudes of people with options is what its all about. Those without options cant be changed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    While that seems logical and certainly a popular opinion. But when you can spend 100k you have a lot of options. Anything that would make you choose something greener is a good thing.

    Changing the attitudes of people with options is what its all about. Those without options cant be changed.

    5k grant on a 100k car is about 5% of the sales price, so therefore not a huge difference in your choice. (you could probable easily negotate this off anyway)

    5k grant on a 30k car is about 17%, so would have a much better impact.

    Also luxury cars of 100k will have more power, us energy quicker and not as effienct, will have e teas like heater seats, heated steering wheel, bigger dash screens all eating energy.

    Grants should be focused on mainstream cars targeted at those where a grant has a major impact on a change of their choice to eV.

    Again I will stress, I belive grants only support a higher list price for car companies and they are making the higher profits and keeping prices as high as possible, as they know the grant is there. We should remove them completely in favour of infrastructure.

    Also do people really think these grants will still be available to the ordinary mass market buyers?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 946 ✭✭✭Phileas Frog


    ForestFire wrote: »
    Again I will stress, I belive grants only support a higher list price for car companies and they are making the higher profits and keeping prices as high as possible, as they know the grant is there. We should remove them completely in favour of infrastructure.

    You're incorrect in your assertion, all you need to do is to compare the prices of the same cars in Germany or elsewhere in Europe.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    You're incorrect in your assertion, all you need to do is to compare the prices of the same cars in Germany or elsewhere in Europe.

    I said "I believe" so I think you'll find I am correct :)

    Is there EV grants in Germany and other countries?

    But my point is, that if you offer grants, manufutures will always set and adjust their prices to maximise profits as much as possible.

    If there are grants, and they can raise prices without impacting sales too much, they will do it.

    If there are no grants, they will reduce prices as much as possible to generate sales.

    They know they are competing with desiles and petrols and in a free market will manufacture and price to meet this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,959 ✭✭✭stesaurus


    rolion wrote: »
    Sorry for picking on you but may I ask you to develop the tax dodge, please !?

    There are no "tax dodge" on BIK, none in road tax, same price for petrol fuel, same price for charging at public charger, same charger as charging at home... where is the hidden secret advantage !??

    Just don't get the fcuking hate towards PHEVs !
    And own a BEV and a PHEV...

    None in road tax? I pay 170 per year, just 50 more than a BEV which puts out 0 emissions at source. Mine even charged everyday could only dream of getting the claimed MPG and emissions that it's tax band is based on.
    It's the same with the VRT rebate. Completely silly to be offering it but I'll damn sure take advantage while it's available.
    PHEVs are a tax dodge. We really shouldn't be offering any incentives on them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,444 ✭✭✭September1


    I think new scheme might be more advantageous, it is not like we have too many EVs on road vs government plans so they will try to find something that brings more EVs to Irish roads. Other issues is they might be also running into some unfair competition regulation, as if you buy brand new from dealer outside of state it makes difficult to obtain grant - which sounds like something no EU friendly. Third thing is maybe SEAI grants do not scale that well, and new system would be easier to administer and pay.

    Additionally under new EU emissions EV would be a bit more profitable to sell, as they would potentially offset fines on ICE cars - so there could be some balancing needed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,528 ✭✭✭copeyhagen


    free road tax, like in the UK would be a good starting point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭daheff


    stesaurus wrote: »
    I'm happy to encourage EV growth though and that's where these funds should be directed. EVs are ready for the masses at this point, it's mainly a supply issue now.

    And cost. don't forget cost!

    EV growth includes PHEV. I have a PHEV - mainly use the ev part of the engine. only use the petrol when doing occasional long journey.

    Many more people are like me too. PHEV is a lower cost entry to EV world for a lot of people.


Advertisement