Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

NCT emissions on a classic car

  • 15-03-2019 3:38pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 100 ✭✭


    Just failed my retest on emissions.
    Low idle CO 0.17%
    HC 1780ppm
    I dont really understand it but the ppm number seems through the roof
    Car is a 1990 bmw 316 with a 2.0 litre conversion.
    Will a simple change of the sparkplugs and some fuel addative help or is it fecked?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,276 ✭✭✭JoeySully


    its not exactly that old, might be better posting in the regular motors forum

    what year is the engine from?

    https://www.bmw-driver.net/forum/ is also a good place for advice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 698 ✭✭✭Tazio


    had the same on an old Alfa with twin carbs - went from >1600 ppm to under 400 with new set of jets and a vacuum retune.

    your engine is dumping too much much unspent fuel out its back pipe...

    Depending on the technology in your engine ( I don't know this engine) it could be one of the following:

    - plugs
    - coil ( or coil pack)
    - Distributor arm
    - points (again don't know your engine) on older cars.
    - leads
    - poor grounding on engine block.
    - newer car - air flow meter inaccurate - or if 'flap type' stuck open
    - newer car - WOT sensor stuck to on (Wide open throttle)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 100 ✭✭Dkhuts


    Not entirely sure of what year the engine is from but its from the same era, is a m20b20


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭w124man


    One word ...... Dipetane!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,118 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    w124man wrote: »
    One word ...... Dipetane!

    Or my preferred method.......an Italian tune up :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 100 ✭✭Dkhuts


    Tazio wrote: »
    had the same on an old Alfa with twin carbs - went from >1600 ppm to under 400 with new set of jets and a vacuum retune.

    your engine is dumping too much much unspent fuel out its back pipe...

    Depending on the technology in your engine ( I don't know this engine) it could be one of the following:

    - plugs
    - coil ( or coil pack)
    - Distributor arm
    - points (again don't know your engine) on older cars.
    - leads
    - poor grounding on engine block.
    - newer car - air flow meter inaccurate - or if 'flap type' stuck open
    - newer car - WOT sensor stuck to on (Wide open throttle)

    By vacum retune so you mean you got someone to basically tune the amount of air and fuel mixture? Id assume its not simple and would need someone who knows their stuff to do it. Ill try a set of new sparks first of all


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,276 ✭✭✭JoeySully


    Dkhuts wrote: »
    By vacum retune so you mean you got someone to basically tune the amount of air and fuel mixture? Id assume its not simple and would need someone who knows their stuff to do it. Ill try a set of new sparks first of all

    That is for carburettor engines i think. You have fuel injection so ecu decieds how much fuel the engine gets depending on throttle position and how much air in comming in.

    The air intake hose are known to crack. Might be worth haveing a good look at it once removed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 100 ✭✭Dkhuts


    JoeySully wrote: »
    That is for carburettor engines i think. You have fuel injection so ecu decieds how much fuel the engine gets depending on throttle position and how much air in comming in.

    The air intake hose are known to crack. Might be worth haveing a good look at it once removed.
    The car wasnt up to full temp when i brough it to nct as i live 3 mins away, that could be a factor too. Ive the NCT booked for next week and hoping that a set of new sparks, removing the air filter, and some diptane with high rev driving will do the trick


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,946 ✭✭✭Bigus


    Dkhuts wrote: »
    The car wasnt up to full temp when i brough it to nct as i live 3 mins away, that could be a factor too. Ive the NCT booked for next week and hoping that a set of new sparks, removing the air filter, and some diptane with high rev driving will do the trick

    Not much point in going to that retest until you get it tested by a mechanic on a gas analyser first, otherwise it's just unscientific guess work, he should be able to find something obvious with the HC so high .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 100 ✭✭Dkhuts


    Bigus wrote: »
    Not much point in going to that retest until you get it tested by a mechanic on a gas analyser first, otherwise it's just unscientific guess work, he should be able to find something obvious with the HC so high .

    Good call, bringing it to a mechanic day nefore the nct hopefully he solves it


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭w124man


    Run a few tankful's treated with Dipetane through the system and make sure you drive the car for at least 20 miles on a good road to blow the cobwebs out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 100 ✭✭Dkhuts


    w124man wrote: »
    Run a few tankful's treated with Dipetane through the system and make sure you drive the car for at least 20 miles on a good road to blow the cobwebs out.

    Thats the plan but car has no tax or nct so dont want to be driving jt that much


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,118 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Dkhuts wrote: »
    Thats the plan but car has no tax or nct so dont want to be driving jt that much

    Tax it so.

    And print out your NCT appointment confirmation and bring it with you. Almost all gardai are reasonable people like the rest of us and they will have no problem with that. I presume the car is insured. Then take the advice several people gave you: take the car on a long spirited drive. And then put it through the NCT again.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The CO is really really *really* low for a car without a cat (I presume) indicating that it's running too lean at idle. That can result in high unburnt content (HC) due to resulting misfires. A good ballpark figure for CO should be about 1 or maybe a tad higher (seen as it's a relative modern engine just before the cats were introduced). For older cars 1.5-3.0 is more suitable.

    Could it be a massive leak at the inlet side? Like a bit missing from inlet manifold gasket.

    For a properly running engine that doesn't burn any oil CO 1.0 HC 100 is a good target. You are almost 20 times over in HC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 Kylie Fan


    Hi Folks,
    Similar issue, failed CO emissions at low idle of 4.05 vs 3.5 for a classic 998c mini (carb). HC emissions passed.
    Is there any point in getting retest with a bottle of dipetane or equivalent plus having it warmer (oil temp was 28C)?
    Would increasing the idle speed help?
    Air and oil filters are new so don’t think they are the issue

    Tuning the carb is last option If I need to find a mechanic who would do it.
    Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,499 ✭✭✭Seweryn


    Kylie Fan wrote: »
    Hi Folks,
    Similar issue, failed CO emissions at low idle of 4.05 vs 3.5 for a classic 998c mini (carb). HC emissions passed.
    Is there any point in getting retest with a bottle of dipetane or equivalent plus having it warmer (oil temp was 28C)?
    Would increasing the idle speed help?
    Air and oil filters are new so don’t think they are the issue

    Tuning the carb is last option If I need to find a mechanic who would do it.
    Thanks
    You should be able to easily reduce the CO by making sure the engine is fully warmed up and being driven for say 20 km before the test. I would also take it for a bit longer spin some time before the re-test. You can increase the idle speed to about 1200 rpm (this on its own could do the trick). No harm to put some Dipetane for extra help.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,107 ✭✭✭hi5


    It could be the fuel/air mixture, there is usually a screw on the carb to adjust this.
    You will need a vacuum gauge, lean out the mixture until you have maximum vacuum.

    https://www.raygrahams.com/products/55477-draper-59075-vacuum-and-fuel-pump-tester.aspx?pv=25513&currency=eur&gclid=CjwKCAjw8LTmBRBCEiwAbhh-6PerxbRaiTTTtLD3P22bnEVB6k2UAJ7wndvNVuO0CP3Kz-dFdSA7DxoC2F0QAvD_BwE


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 Kylie Fan


    hi5 wrote: »
    It could be the fuel/air mixture, there is usually a screw on the carb to adjust this.
    You will need a vacuum gauge, lean out the mixture until you have maximum vacuum.

    https://www.raygrahams.com/products/55477-draper-59075-vacuum-and-fuel-pump-tester.aspx?pv=25513&currency=eur&gclid=CjwKCAjw8LTmBRBCEiwAbhh-6PerxbRaiTTTtLD3P22bnEVB6k2UAJ7wndvNVuO0CP3Kz-dFdSA7DxoC2F0QAvD_BwE
    Thanks, I wouldn’t be confident on whether i would make it worse or better without being able to measure the emissions. I have heard you can judge it by the condition of the spark plugs but I don’t really have experience of doing it.

    As carbs are probably only on cars that are nearly 30 years old would most mechanics( at least ones under 40) be familiar with tuning them, probably simple enough job when you know what your doing?


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 5,126 Mod ✭✭✭✭kadman


    Was the original carb from the 2 litre setup fitted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,499 ✭✭✭Seweryn


    Kylie Fan wrote: »
    Thanks, I wouldn’t be confident on whether i would make it worse or better without being able to measure the emissions. I have heard you can judge it by the condition of the spark plugs but I don’t really have experience of doing it.

    As carbs are probably only on cars that are nearly 30 years old would most mechanics( at least ones under 40) be familiar with tuning them, probably simple enough job when you know what your doing?
    I wouldn't give that job to anyone unless he uses proper equipment, i.e. an exhaust gas analyser. Otherwise I can do it myself with just as good results.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Seweryn wrote: »
    I wouldn't give that job to anyone unless he uses proper equipment, i.e. an exhaust gas analyser. Otherwise I can do it myself with just as good results.

    For carbs there maybe specs like "Fully close the mixture screw and open by 2.5 turns" to get it to a right ball park. I'm almost ready to bet that, as the CO is just a tad over the limit, by just closing the mixture screw (if fitted, could be hidden behind a tamper proof seal) by a small amount (1/4 - 1/2 turns) would be enough to make the Mini pass.

    In general the good rule of thumb is that idle mixture screw should be turned to where the idle speed is the highest and the idle screw then turned until you reach a specificed idle or if not specified to 900 rpm +/- 50 for most of the engines that rev up to 5000-6000 max. Alternatively adjust to close to minimum where the engine still runs smoothly with headlights on.


Advertisement