Paul Galvin Footwear

Big Words

Is shoes four to five sizes too big the new thing?


https://www.google.ie/search?q=paul+galvin+shoe%23&client=safari&hl=en-ie&prmd=isnv&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwidhse2lOzgAhWBoXEKHfibAe8Q_AUoAXoECAwQAQ#imgrc=TQ0YE8rP0q5MfM

Obviously stuff with Kleenex etc

NIMAN

If that man is fashionable, then I'm so glad I have no fashion sense.

colm_mcm

He looks like a primary school production of Borat.

freshpopcorn

I've actually looked at his range at Dunnes a few times and it's a little boring.
I've decided that I wear what I want/like now. There's certain in looks that Paul may be into and I know they aren't for me.
All these fads/etc change every so often.

Big Words

Have you tried the trend of getting shoes four sizes too large freshpopcorn?

endacl

Big Words wrote: »

Is shoes four to five sizes too big the new thing?

It's to balance out his trousers. Four to five sizes too small.

Who was it that described fashion as being like a pack of hunting hounds? One dog knows where it's going. The rest are just following ar5eholes.

NIMAN

freshpopcorn

Big Words wrote: »

Have you tried the trend of getting shoes four sizes too large freshpopcorn?

No!

Church on Tuesday

Outfit's generally fine, it's the comically large footwear that lets it down.

Also Galvin's clothing line is expensive garbage.

Charles Ingles

I prefer Alan Partridge sports/casual range .
Timeless classics for the more refined gentleman

donegal_man

Begod, he looks like he could kick start a combine harvester.
"Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months." Oscar Wilde

Anteayer

I really hope these trends change soon. I'm bored of and don't like current men's fashion to the point that I have given up. I'm buying way less clothes.

It's one of those cycles of anti fashion and ugly. If you look back over the decades, similar happened in the early 1980s.

I don't see this decade as being one we look back on without going wtf were people thinking.

OldRio

To be honest buy classic clothing and bollocks to fashion.
Fashion changes the classics don't.

whisky_galore

I'd have the likes of Daniel Craig as a style icon anyday before a duster throwing Gaah head in tight trousers and clown shoes.

route9

Am always amazed how plain and ordinary these brand-name clothes are! I was checking out Galvin's collection in Dunnes and there was a t-shirt you'd find in any Jack and Jones and well, Dunnes!

There was one shirt that was nice but ridiculous in terms of sizes - the large was too small and the XL was a cape! Then another bright blue shirt which looked like a nurse's top or something. Strange, you'd think they'd be really stylish but back to the drawing board Paul (bet he reads this )

L1011

My actual feet are size 13. They don't look like the borderline clown shoe look that is popular now. I may need to get 16s or something should want to be fashionable :pac:

touts

The men's "Designer" stuff in Dunnes is a bit hit and miss. The Galvin and Harrington stuff are quite poor. They are basically St Bernard quality with a celeb name slapped on them and the price tag. But the Paul Costello stuff is generally very good quality. I suppose that shows that being a designer is a bit more complex than lads like Galvin would like to think.

route9

touts wrote: »

The men's "Designer" stuff in Dunnes is a bit hit and miss. The Galvin and Harrington stuff are quite poor. They are basically St Bernard quality with a celeb name slapped on them and the price tag. But the Paul Costello stuff is generally very good quality. I suppose that shows that being a designer is a bit more complex than lads like Galvin would like to think.

Yep Galvin's stuff is literally like Jack and Jones in Dunnes!